Hi Markus,
2014-04-06 10:01 GMT+02:00 Markus Metz markus.metz.gisw...@gmail.com:
big strong +1 for me, Martin
+1 from me too, with one comment: I will only backport bugfixes to a
releasebranch, not new functionality. That includes releasebranch_7_0.
The (my) objective is to stabilize any
Dear PSC members,
2014-04-06 10:08 GMT+02:00 Martin Landa landa.mar...@gmail.com:
+1 from me too, with one comment: I will only backport bugfixes to a
releasebranch, not new functionality. That includes releasebranch_7_0.
The (my) objective is to stabilize any releasebranch.
this should
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Martin Landa landa.mar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
2014-03-31 9:57 GMT+02:00 Sören Gebbert soerengebb...@googlemail.com:
+1
I agree to 100%
big strong +1 for me, Martin
also from me: retire GRASS6.5.svn (=develbranch6).
markusN
On 06/04/14 13:46, Hamish wrote:
First of all, I believe this discussion belongs on the grass-dev list, not PSC.
See RFC1.
CC'in to dev-list
releasebranch70 should not have been branched until 7.0RC1. Until RC1
it is just wasted effort to keep the two of them as a 1:1 mirror, so
what's
Hi,
2014-04-06 15:16 GMT+02:00 Moritz Lennert mlenn...@club.worldonline.be:
As already mentioned I was also a bit surprised by this. I'm not sure we are
really ready for something more than a tech-preview (and not a real
release), but maybe it could be the kick in the behind that we need to
On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Moritz Lennert
mlenn...@club.worldonline.be wrote:
On 06/04/14 13:46, Hamish wrote:
As mentioned before, I wish to use the bulk of my grass dev time
maintaining the grass 6 line. To do that properly I need a staging
area, and devbr6 is it.
I don't see the
On 29/03/14 07:04, Luca Delucchi wrote:
Hi PSC,
with the upcoming GRASS 7 release we have to many branches to maintain
(releasebranch6, devbranch6, releasebranch7 and trunk).
Can I ask you to take a decision about the future of all this branches?
I could suggest something like:
- keep
Dear PSC,
2014-03-31 4:30 GMT+02:00 Yann Chemin yche...@gmail.com:
+1 to remove devbranch6 after appropriate transfer of the needed to
releasebranch6.
same here +1, maybe not to remove, just to set as read only
Do we have a tentative time line to freeze Grass6 release branch (1 year?)
You
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 4:30 AM, Yann Chemin yche...@gmail.com wrote:
In favour of giving the devbranch6 a prune, I cannot remember when I used
grass6-dev last time...
Obviously will maintain GRASS 6.4.x for more time, that's our LTS...
+1 to remove devbranch6 after appropriate transfer of
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Moritz Lennert
mlenn...@club.worldonline.be wrote:
The initial idea was to create a tech-preview release of grass7, not an
official 7.0 release. Has that changed during the sprint ?
No, this is what happened: beta1 (called like this to maintain
consistency with
On 31/03/14 10:34, Markus Neteler wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Moritz Lennert
mlenn...@club.worldonline.be wrote:
The initial idea was to create a tech-preview release of grass7, not an
official 7.0 release. Has that changed during the sprint ?
No, this is what happened: beta1
Along the same lines, I don’t feel in the loop enough to judge specifics, but
like the thrust of the discussion.
So +0 from me too, if it’s needed.
On Mar 30, 2014, at 17:32 , Massimiliano Cannata
massimiliano.cann...@supsi.ch wrote:
I'm in general in favor, but would like to know the
In favour of giving the devbranch6 a prune, I cannot remember when I used
grass6-dev last time...
+1 to remove devbranch6 after appropriate transfer of the needed to
releasebranch6.
Do we have a tentative time line to freeze Grass6 release branch (1 year?)
Yann
On 29 March 2014 11:34, Luca
+1
On 30 March 2014 02:47, Helmut Kudrnovsky hel...@web.de wrote:
Dear GRASS GIS PSC,
margherita wrote
Dear Luca,
thank you for raising this issue,
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Luca Delucchi lt;
lucadeluge@
gt; wrote:
with the upcoming GRASS 7 release we have to
Dear Luca,
thank you for raising this issue,
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Luca Delucchi lucadel...@gmail.com wrote:
with the upcoming GRASS 7 release we have to many branches to maintain
(releasebranch6, devbranch6, releasebranch7 and trunk).
Can I ask you to take a decision about the
Dear GRASS GIS PSC,
margherita wrote
Dear Luca,
thank you for raising this issue,
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Luca Delucchi lt;
lucadeluge@
gt; wrote:
with the upcoming GRASS 7 release we have to many branches to maintain
(releasebranch6, devbranch6, releasebranch7 and
16 matches
Mail list logo
