On Tuesday 02 March 2010, Rich Shepard wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Mar 2010, Dylan Beaudette wrote:
> > I have found that with a certain amount of smoothing (r.param.scale ,
> > r.neighbors) and the right color scheme (r.colors [-e]) one can generate
> > pretty nice looking maps that display overall trends.
On Tue, 2 Mar 2010, Dylan Beaudette wrote:
I have found that with a certain amount of smoothing (r.param.scale ,
r.neighbors) and the right color scheme (r.colors [-e]) one can generate
pretty nice looking maps that display overall trends.
Dylan,
I used r.param.scale extensively; will learn
On Monday 01 March 2010, Rich Shepard wrote:
>The output maps from r.slope.aspect. r.resamp.rst, and even r.topidx the
> output maps have values for each cell rather than trends. This is very
> difficult to interpret by non-technical viewers.
>
>I've seen maps of slopes, profile and planar
On Tue, 2 Mar 2010, Glynn Clements wrote:
Filter the input data with r.neighbors[1], r.mfilter, etc.
[1] I wouldn't use method=mode if you're going to calculate
derivatives. I'm not so sure about method=median either.
I appreciate learning of options that did not strike me as appropriate
wh
Rich Shepard wrote:
>The output maps from r.slope.aspect. r.resamp.rst, and even r.topidx the
> output maps have values for each cell rather than trends. This is very
> difficult to interpret by non-technical viewers.
>
>I've seen maps of slopes, profile and planar curvature, and topogra
Rich:
> Is there a way to get smoother output maps
run eg 'r.neighbors method=mode' to smooth/denoise maps
'r.param.scale param=feature' also offers a simplified version.
both modules allow you to change the search window size. the bigger the
window, the more smoothing.
Hamish
