Hi!
The problem with the “let graylog web pass on things” idea is that it is not
the web interface that decides on authentication/authorization at all, but the
server (in fact, all servers in the cluster do so).
What the web interface does is to pass on the entered credentials, and the
server
Hi there
Let me confess that I have an agenda of wanting graylog-web to support
SAML, but from my google-ing about I can also see others have asked for
Kerberos, Basic, etc authentication to be added to graylog-web.
That is actually sounding like a whole lot of work... I was wondering if an
