{greenyouth} Re: A response to the thread M.N Vijayan & Nalini Jameela

2007-10-19 Thread ranju radha
yes santhosh this is the right spirit the issue of transcriber again and again raised by dilip is another ploy to tarnish Nalini's "Authorhood" a person need not or may not get satisfied with "transcribers" also but may not articulate will u shout at the person who patronise at ur bad time but sure

{greenyouth} Re: A response to the thread M.N Vijayan & Nalini Jameela

2007-10-19 Thread Santhosh Kumar
let us have discussion on this subject. because there are many things involved. from the morality issues raised by kerala society, literary value by writers, professional writers writting somebody's autobiography, the same being rewritten by others, the royalty issue,... to name some of it. it is u

{greenyouth} Re: A response to the thread M.N Vijayan & Nalini Jameela

2007-10-19 Thread ranju radha
oru santhosha vartha asooyakkum anil THARAyathiunum ippol marunnundu even anivar knows it On 10/19/07, Anil Tharayath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I have not stopped anyone from speaking after all who am I to stop? > Ill post my feelings if it does not sound "theoretical" theoretician > maaa

{greenyouth} Re: A response to the thread M.N Vijayan & Nalini Jameela

2007-10-19 Thread ranju radha
to anil; pls tell me that idam MR. Varghese hope u kinda wont be there and for ur kind info. i get angry when my dog can't pick his ass to shit only sorry not all can't be anivar after all. if he dont know how to cut it, let him show the courage to cut this one On 10/19/07, ahmed rafeek j <[EM

{greenyouth} Re: A response to the thread M.N Vijayan & Nalini Jameela

2007-10-19 Thread ahmed rafeek j
To Ranjtih, why so? > Why cant u let Gopinath speak > Why only dileep raj and his 'truth" be conceived as 'truth' > I agree with you. A democratic forum should be democratic and all voices should be heard, including Gopinath, though he is a newbie. To Anil, I feel that Gopinath has all the rig

{greenyouth} Re: A response to the thread M.N Vijayan & Nalini Jameela

2007-10-19 Thread Anil Tharayath
I have not stopped anyone from speaking after all who am I to stop? Ill post my feelings if it does not sound "theoretical" theoretician maaarude idam vereyannu Ranju Radhe Ranju when you get emotions when the term "Dalit" discouse comes into picture. It is with the same passion I also spe

{greenyouth} Re: A response to the thread M.N Vijayan & Nalini Jameela

2007-10-19 Thread ranju radha
why so? Why cant u let Gopinath speak Why only dileep raj and his 'truth" be conceived as 'truth' let der be different voices heard let various "authors" talk (including our beloved ghost author/s) On 10/19/07, Anil Tharayath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Dear friends > > > pacha malayalathil

{greenyouth} Re: A response to the thread M.N Vijayan & Nalini Jameela

2007-10-18 Thread Anil Tharayath
Dear friends pacha malayalathil (sorry cannot write in malayalam font) [the moderator can delete if found inflamatory or defamatory] ee gopinathane pole ulavanmarre entha cheyuka!!! Avante koppile 'lies' On Oct 19, 10:12 am, "aryakrishnan ramakrishnan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > D

{greenyouth} Re: A response to the thread M.N Vijayan & Nalini Jameela

2007-10-18 Thread aryakrishnan ramakrishnan
Dear Gopinath and all friends > > happened to see the discussions based on the book nalini jameela. I havent come across a book 'nalini jameela'. Were there discussions in this list also? i am > gopinath who has written that book first time. If you are the writer of the book, you must be kn