Re: [grpc-io] Local in process server

2020-12-27 Thread Anton Smirnov
Hi, I've found InProcess transport incompatible between the languages (C++ + Java). Please find my follow-up thread . On Tuesday, June 23, 2020 at 11:27:21 AM UTC+5 anothe...@gmail.com wrote: > The C++ implementation that Vijay referred to is

Re: [grpc-io] Local in process server

2020-06-23 Thread anothergmale
The C++ implementation that Vijay referred to is here: https://github.com/grpc/grpc/tree/master/src/core/ext/transport/inproc Currently, the documentation is a bit sparse and, in general, there seems to be more momentum behind the grpc-web implementations than in-process ones but they require

Re: [grpc-io] Local in process server

2019-08-21 Thread christonnavasalo
Hi All, I'm in process of creating C++ components but I need 2 suggestions will in-process transport will be faster r we can use HTTP/2 and also someone please point me to some examples for in-process examples for C++, Most of the places I'm seeing only samples for JAVA. Thanks in advance

Re: [grpc-io] Local in process server

2018-01-24 Thread 'Vijay Pai' via grpc.io
Yes, there has been a C++ in-process transport for about six months now. It is not a perfect replacement for the http2 transport as servers are referenced by pointer and not by name; we have another task in place to add naming for in-process but will probably deal with that after making related

Re: [grpc-io] Local in process server

2018-01-22 Thread Robert Bielik
What is the status of issue https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/11145 ? Does this mean there is now C++ in-process transport ? Den onsdag 30 augusti 2017 kl. 12:06:39 UTC+2 skrev Craig Tiller: > > There's not currently. That's not to say there can't be, but doing better > would likely mean

Re: [grpc-io] Local in process server

2017-08-30 Thread 'Craig Tiller' via grpc.io
There's not currently. That's not to say there can't be, but doing better would likely mean someone signs up to design and implement some kind of shared memory transport. Such an effort would likely be multi quarter to get it done right, and we've currently no plans to do so. On Tue, Aug 29,

Re: [grpc-io] Local in process server

2017-08-29 Thread srivastavag
Hi, This might be somewhat naive questions but are there alternatives to TCP/IP. Basically we are using grpc for embedded system (on Ububtu, currently C++ only) and will want to be communication between *two* processes to be as fast as possible. We have tested with unix domain sockets and

Re: [grpc-io] Local in process server

2017-05-16 Thread 'Vijay Pai' via grpc.io
Hello there, I've recently initiated a pull request on this topic ( https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/11145 ) . It should be ready to go in the next week or so as we wrap up the last few corner cases. This is in gRPC C Core and includes a C++ API for starters ; we'd be glad to take input on

Re: [grpc-io] Local in process server

2017-05-01 Thread Cole Harrison
Craig, I notice this tread is almost a year old, has there been any movement on in process communication? Is there a possibility for Named Pipe support with windows systems? My team is interested in using the C# implementation of gRPC but has a strong desire for Named Pipe support. Thanks