Re: [Gtk-gnutella-devel]RFC: CVS For "casual" developers

2006-03-10 Thread Christian Biere
Alex Bennee wrote: > On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 23:33 +0100, Christian Biere wrote: > > > Is it time to think about maybe moving the hosting of the source > > > tree or someway of making the development process easier for us > > > casual developers that like to track the development tree but don't > > >

Re: [Gtk-gnutella-devel]RFC: CVS For "casual" developers

2006-03-10 Thread Alex Bennee
On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 23:33 +0100, Christian Biere wrote: > Alex Bennee wrote: > > I've been tracking GTKG for a while now via anonymous CVS and its > > been getting more and more painful. Today I can't access it at all > > (I assume this is a SF.net issue). > > > How is its performance for the d

Re: [Gtk-gnutella-devel]RFC: CVS For "casual" developers

2006-03-10 Thread Christian Biere
Alex Bennee wrote: > I've been tracking GTKG for a while now via anonymous CVS and its > been getting more and more painful. Today I can't access it at all > (I assume this is a SF.net issue). > How is its performance for the developers with ssh access? > Is it time to think about maybe moving

[Gtk-gnutella-devel]RFC: CVS For "casual" developers

2006-03-10 Thread Alex Bennee
I've been tracking GTKG for a while now via anonymous CVS and its been getting more and more painful. Today I can't access it at all (I assume this is a SF.net issue). How is its performance for the developers with ssh access? Is it time to think about maybe moving the hosting of the source tree