Re: [Gtk-gnutella-devel] CVS update weirdness

2004-11-15 Thread ko
On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 23:46, Christian Biere wrote: > I use glade 2.6.0. Same here. Any idea on which version Raphael is using, or on how to trick him into upgrading ? ;) Cheers, -- ko [junkpile at free dot fr on this platform] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed mess

Re: [Gtk-gnutella-devel] CVS update weirdness

2004-11-15 Thread ko
t;)); I'll try and make my glade work around this, if possible. Thanks a lot, Cheers, -- ko [junkpile at free dot fr on this platform] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Gtk-gnutella-devel] CVS update weirdness

2004-11-15 Thread ko
lade.c" has changed since my last update (I think) : cvs update: Updating src/ui/gtk/gtk2 C src/ui/gtk/gtk2/interface-glade.c Does the build process modify this file ? If it does, is there a way to perform a "clean update" afterwards ? Thanks in advance, Regards,

Re: [Gtk-gnutella-devel] Why GTKG for GTK+ 2.x doesn't use a sub-notebook for config

2004-03-06 Thread ko
nes into their own windows under glade to prevent gtkg from crashing the compiler (and starving the OS). Please don't undo thoses changes without trying a few compiles first :)) Cheers, ko [junkpile at free dot fr on this platform] On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 15:44, Christian Biere wrote: >

[Gtk-gnutella-devel] Syntax error in share.c

2004-01-14 Thread ko
perience it... `gcc --version` returns : gcc (GCC) 3.2.3 20030422 (Gentoo Linux 1.4 3.2.3-r3, propolice) Attached patch fixes it for me. I know about the current code freeze but IMHO this is a syntax error and you may want to have it fixed before release :) Cheers, ko [junkpile at free dot

[Gtk-gnutella-devel] Bad timestamp on latest CVS

2003-09-24 Thread ko
Hi, I'm running latest CVS (19/09/2003) and the timestamp is wrong in the about box: it says 19/08/2003. It effectively causes gtkg to report that a newer version (from CVS 11/09/2003 :) is available. HTH ko [junkpile at free dot fr on this platform] signature.asc Description: This

Re: [Gtk-gnutella-devel] Re: GUI/core split

2003-06-09 Thread ko
r the months to come. Feel free to pick up the thing and elaborate on it if it seems suitable to you. Cheers, ko [junkpile at free dot fr on this platform] On Mon, 2003-06-09 at 19:55, Jérôme Bouat wrote: > Le jeu 05/06/2003 à 21:45, Mirar a écrit : > > But a specialized binary protocol

Re: [Gtk-gnutella-devel] Generic UI notifications using XML(cont'd)

2003-03-21 Thread ko
> Every 10th of second, is that 1/10 seconds? Or every 10 seconds? It is, of course, one tenth of a second, though this value is arbitrary. ko [junkpile at free dot fr on this platform] --- This SF.net email is sponsored by:Cry

[Gtk-gnutella-devel] Generic UI notifications using XML (cont'd)

2003-03-21 Thread ko
do when separating the whole stuff. This IMHO will need to be put in the core if we ever find a way around *sob*. > Thanks very much for your effort ;) Thanks for yours. I just wish I had more time... Cheers, ko [junkpile at free dot fr on this platform] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Gtk-gnutella-devel] Minor patch

2003-03-21 Thread ko
Hello again, There is a bug in recent incarnations of gtk-missing.c that (at least) negates my whole "avoid-filter-duplicates" patch. Attached patch should fix it. Cheers, ko [junkpile at free dot fr on this platform] Index: src/gtk

Re: [Gtk-gnutella-devel] Remote shell (more info)

2003-03-02 Thread ko
] to understand how to use the remote shell. Monitor posts about core/UI splitting and the underlying protocol if you want to keep up with the progress. Cheers, ko [junkpile at free dot fr on this platform] --- This sf.net email is sponsor

[Gtk-gnutella-devel] Generic UI notifications using XML

2003-03-01 Thread ko
e thing without disturbing much code (yet). I suggest we create a kind of "third frontend" configure option and branch from the same places in the code the gtk1 and gtk2 frontend branch into. If they can react differently to changes, so can we :) ** 11. Final Words ** All feedba

[Gtk-gnutella-devel] Back to business

2003-02-27 Thread ko
e about your subscription/submission model, and I still think XML is best way from the daemon to the frontend. I also have some ideas to submit. Is the list the right place for this topic ? Cheers, ko [junkpile at free dot fr on this platform] --

Re: [Gtk-gnutella-devel] Re: Stats and Config swapped

2003-02-16 Thread ko
to England... See you soon, if I ever come back alive ;) ko --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Gtk-gnutella-devel mailing list [EMAIL

Re: [Gtk-gnutella-devel] Stats and Config swapped

2003-02-16 Thread ko
GTK+ version ? - If you regenerated source files from glade, what is your glade version ? Unfortunately I won't be able to work on gtkg for the upcoming week... If the problem comes from my patch, I'll investigate ASAP. Cheers, ko --

[Gtk-gnutella-devel] Bug 666629

2003-02-03 Thread ko
he widgets right where they should be. I'm able to implement both options. Time, scalability and code reuse advise me to prefer the first. The hacker spirit rushes me to code the second. What do you think ? Cheers, ko [junkpile at free dot fr on this platform] -- If your program can go wr

[Gtk-gnutella-devel] Preventing duplicate filter rules

2003-01-30 Thread ko
t option :) In addition, is there an official icon for gtkg ? Something we can use as a gnome panel/menu icon (I don't know about KDE, I assume the same features are present). Cheers, ko [junkpile at free dot fr on this platform] -- Your fault - Core dumped. Index: src/gtk-missing.c ==