Re: A licence for an ‘awesome list’ (was: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list)

On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 4:47 PM Zelphir Kaltstahl < zelphirkaltst...@posteo.de> wrote: "We also recommend the GNU FDL for dictionaries, encyclopedias, and any > other works that provide information for practical use." > These are works with substantial original content, and the GFDL prevents

Handling object communication in GOOPS

Hello, I would like make objects of two different classes communicate, but I'm not sure how to implement it or if there already exists something for the purpose. Say I have two classes: and . During initialization of an object, it creates a slot containing object. I would like to make the

Re: A licence for an ‘awesome list’ (was: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list)

On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 01:55:18AM +0300, Vladimir Zhbanov wrote: ... > I suspect it is all about including chunks of your GPL'd code as > examples into your other licenced docs. And vice versa, e.g. if I've meant *otherwise licenced*, sorry for mistake. -- Vladimir (λ)επτόν EDA —

Re: A licence for an ‘awesome list’ (was: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list)

On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 10:47:21PM +0200, Zelphir Kaltstahl wrote: > Hi Dmitry! > > On 16.07.20 11:18, Dmitry Alexandrov wrote: > > Zelphir Kaltstahl wrote: > >> On 15.07.20 08:36, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > >>> Zelphir Kaltstahl writes: > > First at foremost, the list _itself_ has

Re: A licence for an ‘awesome list’ (was: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list)

Hi Dmitry! On 16.07.20 11:18, Dmitry Alexandrov wrote: > Zelphir Kaltstahl wrote: >> On 15.07.20 08:36, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >>> Zelphir Kaltstahl writes: > First at foremost, the list _itself_ has to be licensed as a free > documentation. FWIW, most of ‘awesome lists’ are

Re: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list

Dmitry Alexandrov writes: > "Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" wrote: In the case you will stick with Org, there at least should be a runnable build recipe (i. e. a Makefile). >> >> I’d like to cut this discussion short: >> >>

Re: A licence for an ‘awesome list’ (was: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list)

Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide writes: > Dmitry Alexandrov writes: > >> Quoth (emphasis mine): >> | A work released under CC0 is dedicated to the public domain to the fullest >> extent permitted by law. If that is not possible for any reason,

Re: A licence for an ‘awesome list’ (was: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list)

Dmitry Alexandrov writes: > Quoth (emphasis mine): > | A work released under CC0 is dedicated to the public domain to the fullest > extent permitted by law. If that is not possible for any reason, CC0 also > provides a *lax, permissive*

Re: A licence for an ‘awesome list’ (was: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list)

Zelphir Kaltstahl wrote: > On 15.07.20 08:36, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >> Zelphir Kaltstahl writes: First at foremost, the list _itself_ has to be licensed as a free documentation. FWIW, most of ‘awesome lists’ are under CC0. >>> While the list is not CC0, I meant to put it

Re: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list

"Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" wrote: >>> In the case you will stick with Org, there at least should be a runnable >>> build recipe (i. e. a Makefile). > > I’d like to cut this discussion short: > > https://notabug.org/ZelphirKaltstahl/awesome-guile/pulls/1/files > all: readme.md readme.texi