Hello,
The following patch updates lilypond to 2.19.50.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou0x80A93738
>From 239fa264e7e3387ee34039684fff8747900773c3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nicolas Goaziou
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 09:52:52 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] gnu
From: ng0
* gnu/services/version-control.scm: New file.
* gnu/local.mk (GNU_SYSTEM_MODULES): Add it.
* doc/guix.texi (Misellaneous Services)(Version Control): New section.
Co-authored-by: 宋文武
---
doc/guix.texi| 61 +
gnu/local.mk | 1 +
ng0 writes:
> * gnu/services/version-control.scm: New file, create it.
> (git-service): New Procedures.
> (git-service-type): New variable.
> * doc/guix.texi (Services)(Version Control): New section.
Hi, I make and send a new patch based on yours, which rename
'git-service' to 'git-daemon-servic
Hello,
宋文武 writes:
> From: ng0
>
> * gnu/services/version-control.scm: New file.
> * gnu/local.mk (GNU_SYSTEM_MODULES): Add it.
> * doc/guix.texi (Misellaneous Services)(Version Control): New section.
but I find this notation confusing, since "Version Control" belongs to
"Miscellaneous Service
Mathieu Lirzin writes:
> 宋文武 writes:
>
>> From: ng0
>>
>> * gnu/services/version-control.scm: New file.
>> * gnu/local.mk (GNU_SYSTEM_MODULES): Add it.
>> * doc/guix.texi (Misellaneous Services)(Version Control): New section.
>
> but I find this notation confusing, since "Version Control" belon
Mathieu Lirzin writes:
> Mathieu Lirzin writes:
>
>> 宋文武 writes:
>>
>>> From: ng0
>>>
>>> * gnu/services/version-control.scm: New file.
>>> * gnu/local.mk (GNU_SYSTEM_MODULES): Add it.
>>> * doc/guix.texi (Misellaneous Services)(Version Control): New section.
>>
>> but I find this notation con
宋文武 writes:
> From: ng0
>
> * gnu/services/version-control.scm: New file.
> * gnu/local.mk (GNU_SYSTEM_MODULES): Add it.
> * doc/guix.texi (Misellaneous Services)(Version Control): New section.
>
> Co-authored-by: 宋文武
Thanks! As reply to the mssage you've sent before this one: I'm
okay with th
On Sun, 06 Nov 2016 18:19:03 +0100
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Tobias Geerinckx-Rice skribis:
>
> > However, a web search for ‘vhost site:nginx.org’ returns the
> > following as a first result[0]:
> >
> >Note: “VirtualHost” is an Apache term. NGINX does not have
> > Virt
ng0 writes:
>> [...]
>> +
>> +@deftp {Data Type} git-daemon-configuration
>> +Data type representing the configuration of git-demon.
>
> Typo, it should be "git-daemon".
>
OK.
>> +
>> +@table @asis
>> +@item @code{package} (default: @var{git})
>> +Package object of the Git distributed version co
iyzs...@member.fsf.org (宋文武) writes:
> ng0 writes:
>
>>> [...]
>>> +
>>> +@deftp {Data Type} git-daemon-configuration
>>> +Data type representing the configuration of git-demon.
>>
>> Typo, it should be "git-daemon".
>>
>
> OK.
>>> +
>>> +@table @asis
>>> +@item @code{package} (default: @var{git}
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Hello,
>
> The following patch updates lilypond to 2.19.50.
Thanks for this! It seems they released 2.19.51 today, can you send a
patch for that instead? :-)
Perhaps we should switch to the stable branch when 2.20.x is out.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
Marius Bakke writes:
> Thanks for this! It seems they released 2.19.51 today, can you send a
> patch for that instead? :-)
Here it is.
> Perhaps we should switch to the stable branch when 2.20.x is out.
Fine by me.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
Hi.
Following up on an encouragement by Leo to remove a redundancy in the
package
recipes.
In several places (mkdir-p) is used right before (install-file), to the
same
directory. However, (install-file) does (mkdir-p) itself, which makes an
explicit (mkdir-p) redundant.
For reference:
===
Forgot the patch in the initial message :/From 595d438789c7c9a293ae7fac500ace7422073624 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petter
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 13:39:13 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Remove redundancy where mkdir-p is followed by
install-file .
* gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm (bwa)[sourc
Marius Bakke writes:
>>> > Failures in tests caused by external gd are not too serious to
>>> > require us to switch to the bundled one I think. We may not even
>>> > need to patch our libgd with php specific patches, since the
>>> > failures are only slight deviation from the spec on corner case
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Hello,
>
> Marius Bakke writes:
>
>> Thanks for this! It seems they released 2.19.51 today, can you send a
>> patch for that instead? :-)
>
> Here it is.
Thanks, applied!
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
since I will probably use it in openvpn-service and maybe in
nginx-service, I moved the definitions of the documentation that was
duplicated in cups and dovecot to services.scm. Is it the best place
for it?>From 9acc9456f4e61506105bc109298aedb66e31efd0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Julien Lep
ng0 writes:
> Looks good to me, just the one typo which can be fixed before
> applying. I will build a vm with this later to verify that it
> works, but in theory it should just work.
I have problems testing this. Any system configuration I tried so
far silently fails, does not get build, nothin
Hello,
I'm writing a service for dirvish, and I realized that if I'm following
current guix service routes, I might not be able to run all the
operations I need to. It seems that the current route for Guix is to
have your service write out a config that more or less becomes part of
the environmen
I dug a bit more into Chez sheme and the failing armhf build, and it
almost looks like it could be hacked into cross compiling for itself.
Then I looked a bit closer here
(https://github.com/cisco/ChezScheme/blob/master/c/Mf-arm32le#L17) and
it turns out that it targets the Raspberry Pi and not ARM
* gnu/packages/gnome.scm (shared-mime-info): Update to 1.7.
---
gnu/packages/gnome.scm | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/gnome.scm b/gnu/packages/gnome.scm
index 3aa0f56..8b94105 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/gnome.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/gnome.scm
@@
On 2016-11-15 04:57, l...@gnu.org wrote:
Hello!
Luis Felipe López Acevedo skribis:
I cloned the website to try a fix for bug #22115, and wanted to ask
first what process do you follow to try out the whole website locally?
When I build and serve the website with Haunt, I face the following
pro
Christopher Allan Webber writes:
> Hello,
>
> I'm writing a service for dirvish, and I realized that if I'm following
> current guix service routes, I might not be able to run all the
> operations I need to. It seems that the current route for Guix is to
> have your service write out a config tha
On 2016-11-20 15:17, Luis Felipe López Acevedo wrote:
On 2016-11-15 04:57, l...@gnu.org wrote:
Hello!
Luis Felipe López Acevedo skribis:
I cloned the website to try a fix for bug #22115, and wanted to ask
first what process do you follow to try out the whole website
locally?
When I build a
Christopher Allan Webber writes:
> Christopher Allan Webber writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm writing a service for dirvish, and I realized that if I'm following
>> current guix service routes, I might not be able to run all the
>> operations I need to.
Why not? I read the rest of your email but
* gnu/packages/swig.scm (swig): Update to 3.0.10.
---
gnu/packages/swig.scm | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/swig.scm b/gnu/packages/swig.scm
index a615796..acf0529 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/swig.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/swig.scm
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
26 matches
Mail list logo
