On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 23:59:04 -0300
Laura Lazzati wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > I had the feeling that some of your answers sound a bit like a
> > justification. That was maybe because my tone was a bit too
> > demanding?
> No, in fact sth funny is that when we say sound, we are not using our
> voice, we
Hi!
> I had the feeling that some of your answers sound a bit like a
> justification. That was maybe because my tone was a bit too demanding?
No, in fact sth funny is that when we say sound, we are not using our
voice, we are just writing.
You are not demanding, I demand a lot to myself, maybe
Hey all,
Has there been any discussion about creating a raco importer for Racket
packages? This might be something i'd be willing to look into if it is
both compliant with the needs of the upstream racket people, and if
others might use it.
Best,
Brett Gilio
Hi Ricardo,
Laura needs a URL where all videos are placed and which is mentioned at
least in the "getting help" video.
We were discussing where to place the Guix videos and agreed to upload
them to GNU Audio/Video:
https://audio-video.gnu.org/video/
I think that is a good place for the video
Hi Laura,
I had the feeling that some of your answers sound a bit like a
justification. That was maybe because my tone was a bit too demanding?
I want to say that you did and still do good work with the videos and
you mastered several obstacles (including me :-)) and still are like
Gábor said in
I'm taking a look at how to build linux-libre with Wireguard built in.
There are two primary methods offered by Wireguard. Instructions:
https://www.wireguard.com/install/
First, you can run 'create-patch.sh' [0] which prints to stdout a patch that
can be applied to the kernel source code.
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 10:31:03PM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote:
> the package builds, but I see no need to keep it. Do you agree to remove
> it together with mozjs@17? The latter would require a little work, since
> all other mozjs packages inherit from it. If there is consensus, I can
> look into
Hello,
On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 11:27:05PM +0100, Leo Famulari wrote:
> The package in question, mozjs 24, is no longer used by gnome-shell, or
> by any other Guix package.
>
> So, if it still fails to build, we can consider removing it.
the package builds, but I see no need to keep it. Do you
On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 20:22:20 +0100 Simon wrote:
> seems to be shifting to a meta rather than about the state of
> chromium itself
simon - i would like to explain that the reason for that confusion, is
because this thread got cross-posted on multiple mailing lists
the chromium browser is the
On Sun, 17 Feb 2019 11:38:16 +0800
iyzs...@member.fsf.org (宋文武) wrote:
> Yes, I have the 'rm /run/user/1000/shepherd/socket' workaround in my session
> script too...
>
> According to 'man 2 bind', the socket pathname should be deleted when no
> longer required, so a patch to fix this bug:
Hmm,
Hi!
Giovanni Biscuolo writes:
[...]
> first and foremost, IMHO guix-devel is not the place to discuss GNU FSDG
> criteria; I'm going to subscribe gnu-linux-li...@nongnu.org to send
> my comments - and I _have_ some - on the FSDG compliance process
then I decided to "escalate" this issue since
Hi Gábor!
>
> I have also checked with the original project plan, and we are in quite good
> standing if these are done.
thank you :)
>
> Topics that are still missing are these:
> Config on foreign distros - this could be quite modular, and like Björn said,
> it could consist of showing a
Hi!
> 1) Get the videos-repository filled up with the general tools and
> Makefiles from your private repository.
Sure! The only thing that worries me a little is not having the audios
and creating the video with silence. mp3s
> 2) Get as much as possible video-templates in, even if they are only
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 10:34:05AM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>
> Pjotr Prins writes:
>
> > Just running '. $PROFILE/etc/profile' is a bit dangerous. Especially on
> > HPC machines.
> >
> > I guix-notes I also suggest to clear the other environment settings
> > first with
> >
> > env -i
Hello,
2019. febr. 19., K 9:58 dátummal Björn Höfling <
bjoern.hoefl...@bjoernhoefling.de> ezt írta:
> Hi Laura,
>
> I'm pulling this again on guix-devel. We have only two weeks left in
> this Outreachy round and Gábor and I decided to focus on two things:
>
> 1) Get the videos-repository filled
Pjotr Prins writes:
> Just running '. $PROFILE/etc/profile' is a bit dangerous. Especially on
> HPC machines.
>
> I guix-notes I also suggest to clear the other environment settings
> first with
>
> env -i /bin/bash --login --noprofile --norc
You can do this all in one go by passing
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 11:18:09PM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote:
> So the two are clearly not equivalent. Which of them is actually
> preferable? I find it a bit confusing that after running
> "guix package -i hello" I cannot run "hello" immediately, unlike in
> Debian.
Just running '.
Hi Laura,
I'm pulling this again on guix-devel. We have only two weeks left in
this Outreachy round and Gábor and I decided to focus on two things:
1) Get the videos-repository filled up with the general tools and
Makefiles from your private repository.
2) Get as much as possible video-templates
Hello,
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 08:41:47AM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> This only needs to be done when GUIX_PROFILE is not set. The
> definitions in etc/profile either reference /gnu/store directories
> directly (when GUIX_PROFILE is not set) or they reference the profile
> links (when
19 matches
Mail list logo
