Re: [PATCH 4/4] services: openssh: Add 'subsystems' option.

Danny Milosavljevic writes: > Hi ng0, > > On Sun, 5 Mar 2017 14:50:26 + > ng0 wrote: > >> What I take from the discussion is, all is good to go except for >> subsystems. I'm okay with reviewing subsystems as an individual patch >> later on.

Re: [PATCH 4/4] services: openssh: Add 'subsystems' option.

Hi Ludovic, Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hi Clément, > > Clément Lassieur skribis: > >> I think there is a misunderstanding. I didn't want to push this because >> it was not tested, and because subsystems are often useless without >> Match, and Match is

Re: [PATCH 4/4] services: openssh: Add 'subsystems' option.

2017-03-18 12:45 GMT+01:00 Mathieu Lirzin : > ng0 writes: > > > John Darrington transcribed 2.0K bytes: > > > >> I am glad that at least one person can express a point of view and be > polite about > >> it at the same time. If you think it is fine,

Re: [PATCH 4/4] services: openssh: Add 'subsystems' option.

2017-03-18 13:10 GMT+01:00 John Darrington : > On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 11:52:16AM +, ng0 wrote: > > May I remind you that the first reaction of John is being rude to > anyone > who isn't a native speaker? > > That is absolutely not true. I have

Re: [PATCH 4/4] services: openssh: Add 'subsystems' option.

On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 11:52:16AM +, ng0 wrote: May I remind you that the first reaction of John is being rude to anyone who isn't a native speaker? That is absolutely not true. I have reviewed this current thread and I do not see any instance of rudeness on my part. As I have

Re: [PATCH 4/4] services: openssh: Add 'subsystems' option.

Mathieu Lirzin transcribed 1.4K bytes: > ng0 writes: > > > John Darrington transcribed 2.0K bytes: > > > >> I am glad that at least one person can express a point of view and be > >> polite about > >> it at the same time. If you think it is fine, then it is your

Re: [PATCH 4/4] services: openssh: Add 'subsystems' option.

ng0 writes: > John Darrington transcribed 2.0K bytes: > >> I am glad that at least one person can express a point of view and be >> polite about >> it at the same time. If you think it is fine, then it is your right to use >> it. >> >> I find it confusing and

Re: [PATCH 4/4] services: openssh: Add 'subsystems' option.

John Darrington transcribed 2.0K bytes: > On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 12:21:31PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 06:36:20AM +0100, John Darrington wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 08:45:27PM +, ng0 wrote: > > > > ps Cl??ment: 'them'/'they' are

Re: grammar usage (was: Re: [PATCH 4/4] services: openssh: Add 'subsystems' option.)

On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 05:13:49PM +0100, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: No. John, I find you very rude in this thread. Please stop dismissing as ???reproachful, judgemental, censorious, or sanctimonious??? anyone who dares correct your unsolicited incorrections. Yelling

Re: [PATCH 4/4] services: openssh: Add 'subsystems' option.

On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 06:36:20AM +0100, John Darrington wrote: > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 08:45:27PM +, ng0 wrote: > > ps Cl??ment: 'them'/'they' are pronouns if you don't know the gender > and/or > prefered pronoun of a person :) > > > ... according to some. - but most

Re: grammar usage (was: Re: [PATCH 4/4] services: openssh: Add 'subsystems' option.)

No. John, I find you very rude in this thread. Please stop dismissing as ‘reproachful, judgemental, censorious, or sanctimonious’ anyone who dares correct your unsolicited incorrections. Yelling ‘DON'T BRING IT UP’ when they address your behaviour isn't helping your case either. Everyone's

Re: grammar usage (was: Re: [PATCH 4/4] services: openssh: Add 'subsystems' option.)

On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 10:42:10AM +, ng0 wrote: Respecting people is more important than correct grammar. I agree. So please afford me a little respect. My choice of pronoun for myself is they/them. I'm not picking strawman arguments here, all I wanted to express

Re: grammar usage (was: Re: [PATCH 4/4] services: openssh: Add 'subsystems' option.)

John Darrington transcribed 2.9K bytes: > On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 11:08:04AM +, ng0 wrote: > John Darrington transcribed 1.1K bytes: > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 08:45:27PM +, ng0 wrote: > > > > ps Cl??ment: 'them'/'they' are pronouns if you don't know the >

Re: grammar usage (was: Re: [PATCH 4/4] services: openssh: Add 'subsystems' option.)

On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 11:08:04AM +, ng0 wrote: John Darrington transcribed 1.1K bytes: > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 08:45:27PM +, ng0 wrote: > > ps Cl??ment: 'them'/'they' are pronouns if you don't know the gender and/or > prefered pronoun of a person :)

grammar usage (was: Re: [PATCH 4/4] services: openssh: Add 'subsystems' option.)

John Darrington transcribed 1.1K bytes: > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 08:45:27PM +, ng0 wrote: > > ps Cl??ment: 'them'/'they' are pronouns if you don't know the gender > and/or > prefered pronoun of a person :) > > > ... according to some. - but most linguists, and many orators (the

Re: [PATCH 4/4] services: openssh: Add 'subsystems' option.

On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 08:45:27PM +, ng0 wrote: ps Cl??ment: 'them'/'they' are pronouns if you don't know the gender and/or prefered pronoun of a person :) ... according to some. - but most linguists, and many orators (the president of the Free Software Foundation being one of

Re: [PATCH 4/4] services: openssh: Add 'subsystems' option.

ng0 writes: > Ludovic Courtès transcribed 1.1K bytes: >> Hi Clément, >> >> Clément Lassieur skribis: >> >> > I think there is a misunderstanding. I didn't want to push this because >> > it was not tested, and because subsystems are often

Re: [PATCH 4/4] services: openssh: Add 'subsystems' option.

Ludovic Courtès transcribed 1.1K bytes: > Hi Clément, > > Clément Lassieur skribis: > > > I think there is a misunderstanding. I didn't want to push this because > > it was not tested, and because subsystems are often useless without > > Match, and Match is unsupported.

Re: [PATCH 4/4] services: openssh: Add 'subsystems' option.

Hi Clément, Clément Lassieur skribis: > I think there is a misunderstanding. I didn't want to push this because > it was not tested, and because subsystems are often useless without > Match, and Match is unsupported. The pair/list thing is not the > problem. > > And I

Re: [PATCH 4/4] services: openssh: Add 'subsystems' option.

> Hi ng0, > > On Sun, 5 Mar 2017 14:50:26 + > ng0 wrote: > >> What I take from the discussion is, all is good to go except for >> subsystems. I'm okay with reviewing subsystems as an individual patch >> later on. For me this works. Push the 3 patches, and send the

Re: [PATCH 4/4] services: openssh: Add 'subsystems' option.

Hi ng0, On Sun, 5 Mar 2017 14:50:26 + ng0 wrote: > What I take from the discussion is, all is good to go except for > subsystems. I'm okay with reviewing subsystems as an individual patch > later on. For me this works. Push the 3 patches, and send the subsystems >

Re: [PATCH 4/4] services: openssh: Add 'subsystems' option.

On 17-03-02 22:00:47, Clément Lassieur wrote: > Hi Danny, > > Danny Milosavljevic writes: > > > Hi, > > > > On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 00:53:55 +0100 > > Clément Lassieur wrote: > >> +This is a list of two-element tuples, > > > > list of pairs. > > >

Re: [PATCH 4/4] services: openssh: Add 'subsystems' option.

Hi Danny, Danny Milosavljevic writes: > Hi, > > On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 00:53:55 +0100 > Clément Lassieur wrote: >> +This is a list of two-element tuples, > > list of pairs. > >>where each tuple contains the > > each pair > >> +subsystem name and a

[PATCH 4/4] services: openssh: Add 'subsystems' option.

* gnu/services/ssh.scm (openssh-config-file): Add it. ()[subsystems]: Add it. * doc/guix.texi (Networking Services): Document it. --- doc/guix.texi| 19 + gnu/services/ssh.scm | 80 +--- 2 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 35