Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chiara Francesca
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 4:44 PM
To: 'Historical Costume'
Subject: RE: [h-cost] 3 'new' portraits of Queen Elizabeth
First, the first image on my site is the one from the b
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chiara Francesca
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 4:44 PM
To: 'Historical Costume'
Subject: RE: [h-cost] 3 'new' portraits of Queen Elizabeth
First, the first image on my site is the one from the book everyone is
referring to, the second image I
L PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chiara Francesca
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 4:44 PM
To: 'Historical Costume'
Subject: RE: [h-cost] 3 'new' portraits of Queen Elizabeth
First, the first image on my site is the one from the book everyone is
referring to
I think they look like cut out diamonds as well.
Just my .02
ailith
Sharon Collier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree on them being slashes and small cut out diamonds. I've heard such
> slashings were a sign the wearer was wealthy, as they could afford to "ruin"
> fabric with such work,
that elusive text source.
Chiara Francesca
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Sharon Collier
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 5:07 PM
To: 'Historical Costume'
Subject: RE: [h-cost] 3 'new' portraits of Queen Elizabeth
I
:) I've been corrected, they are pinkings not slashes because they are small
cuts or they are cutouts. :)
whoopsie :)
De
-Original Message-
I agree on them being slashes and small cut out diamonds. I've heard such
slashings were a sign the wearer was wealthy, as they could afford to "rui
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of otsisto
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2007 1:16 PM
To: Historical Costume
Subject: RE: [h-cost] 3 'new' portraits of Queen Elizabeth
On the zoom at Sotheby's they look more like puffs/slash then a stud. But
definitely not a jewel.
The fi
At 12:55 PM 10/27/2007, you wrote:
I am betting on jewels or studs too. We would have to look at all the other
portraits of her to really figure out what they are. And we need to track
where this painting ends up so that someone can go look at it!! :)
They look like studs to me, too. Isn't it
On the zoom at Sotheby's they look more like puffs/slash then a stud. But
definitely not a jewel.
The first picture from Chiara's site indicates that they are slashes, small
pinkings between embroidered "Xs". You find the pink and X pattern on the
sleeves under the arm where the horizontal slashes
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Genie Barrett
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2007 9:52 AM
To: Historical Costume
Subject: RE: [h-cost] 3 'new' portraits of Queen Elizabeth
At 04:15 PM 10/26/2007, you wrote:
>Here are the Norris comparison images
>http://www.glove.org/costume/curren
At 04:15 PM 10/26/2007, you wrote:
Here are the Norris comparison images
http://www.glove.org/costume/current/elizabeth1.php
Chiara Francesca
OK, so are those diamonds slashes, or jewels, or studs? I'm thinking
studs, myself. I'm talking on the skirt.
Hmmm.
Genie
_
Here are the Norris comparison images
http://www.glove.org/costume/current/elizabeth1.php
Chiara Francesca
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Elizabeth Walpole
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2007 7:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Historic Costume
Su
12 matches
Mail list logo
