Hi Chris
I have tried both 32 bit and 64 bit 10.04. The 64 bit has less programs than
the 32 bit.
The grub on the 10.04 is painful. It is grub 2.
I convert movie avi to a tighter format. The 64 bit is faster doing this task
and it can multitask better.
On the beta 10.4 it ran virtualbox 32
> Unless you run a large database or something just stick with
> 32-bit
It might also be useful if you're planning on playing any virtualisation
games.
My 64-bit machine will run 32-bit guests, but my 32-bit ones won't run
64-bit guests.
Vic.
--
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
W
I run 64-bit and have no problems. However, what are you going to
gain? Unless you run a large database or something just stick with
32-bit (which is a darn sight more memory efficient too - all my VMs
are 32-bit and they run in much less RAM than the 64-bit ones).
FWIW I ran 64-bit because I wa
Hello fellow Hamp'ers,
Yes, there is a Surrey LUG meeting at Nokia, Farnborough, on May 15th.
Feel free to come along.
As usual please send me your name, car reg, next of kin incl tel no. so that
security stay happy. :)
Please subject the email "Linux meeting"
Cheers all,
Bob.
On Tuesday 04 May 2010, captain haddock wrote:
> Hello Everybody,
> a) Does anyone on this list work for the University of Southampton and
> would be willing to allow us into the rooms 5 or 6 times per year? I know
> it's an ask but if there is anyone it would make a lot of penguins happy.
> I jo
Paul Tansom wrote:
> OK, not necessarily just Lucid, but things have changed with my upgrade. I'll
> quickly work through a bit of history in case it helps. I'm basically curious
> to know how the default behaviour of the desktop should be so I know what the
> actual quirks are! This is on an HP Mi
** Hugo Mills [2010-05-05 16:55]:
> On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 01:04:51PM +0100, John Lewis wrote:
> > I don't understand the DNS system at all other than a need to put some
> > nameservers into /etc/resolv.conf (or equivalent) and didn't realise
> > until this problem came up that startx.co.uk neede
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 01:04:51PM +0100, John Lewis wrote:
> I don't understand the DNS system at all other than a need to put some
> nameservers into /etc/resolv.conf (or equivalent) and didn't realise
> until this problem came up that startx.co.uk needed the *.myth.co.uk
> servers
The DNS is
** john lewis [2010-05-05 14:07]:
> On Wed, 5 May 2010 12:30:48 +
> Andy Smith wrote:
> > On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 01:04:51PM +0100, john lewis wrote:
> > > Is there any way I can get startx.co.uk recognised by some other
> > > nameserver(s)?
> >
> > I think you'll need to get
> >
> > R
On Wed, 5 May 2010 16:16:16 +0100
Hugo Mills wrote:
> On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 04:04:42PM +0100, James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
> > In the mean time, find out what your IP address is for startx.co.uk,
> > and let your wife type the IP address into the web browser instead
> > of the name.
>
>Not
On Wed, 5 May 2010 13:22:56 +
Andy Smith wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 02:03:13PM +0100, john lewis wrote:
> > In the meantime none of my 'clients' can connect with my database
> > and since one of those is my wife I am in bother ;-(
>
> Get her to connect by IP or point ano
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 04:04:42PM +0100, James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
> In the mean time, find out what your IP address is for startx.co.uk,
> and let your wife type the IP address into the web browser instead of
> the name.
Note that this will only work if startx is the only (or at least
the
On 5 May 2010 13:04, john lewis wrote:
>
> I don't understand the DNS system at all other than a need to put some
> nameservers into /etc/resolv.conf (or equivalent) and didn't realise
> until this problem came up that startx.co.uk needed the *.myth.co.uk
> servers
>
The DNS system is a distribut
Hi John,
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 02:03:13PM +0100, john lewis wrote:
> In the meantime none of my 'clients' can connect with my database
> and since one of those is my wife I am in bother ;-(
Get her to connect by IP or point another domain at it?
Cheers,
Andy
signature.asc
Description: Digita
On Wed, 5 May 2010 12:30:48 +
Andy Smith wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 01:04:51PM +0100, john lewis wrote:
> > Is there any way I can get startx.co.uk recognised by some other
> > nameserver(s)?
>
> I think you'll need to get
>
> Registrar:
> Abscissa.com Limit
Hi John,
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 01:04:51PM +0100, john lewis wrote:
> Is there any way I can get startx.co.uk recognised by some other
> nameserver(s)?
I think you'll need to get
Registrar:
Abscissa.com Limited [Tag = MYTH]
URL: http://www.myth.co.uk
to change the nameserv
> On Wed, 5 May 2010 11:22:00 +
> Andy Smith wrote:
>
> > Hi John,
> >
> > On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 10:50:16AM +0100, john lewis wrote:
> > > startx.co.uk ("John Lewis Trading As:") is delegated to two
> > > nameservers, however both delegated nameservers are missing in the
> > > zone
> >
>
On Wed, 5 May 2010 11:22:00 +
Andy Smith wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 10:50:16AM +0100, john lewis wrote:
> > startx.co.uk ("John Lewis Trading As:") is delegated to two
> > nameservers, however both delegated nameservers are missing in the
> > zone
>
> I like using Squishy
OK, not necessarily just Lucid, but things have changed with my upgrade. I'll
quickly work through a bit of history in case it helps. I'm basically curious
to know how the default behaviour of the desktop should be so I know what the
actual quirks are! This is on an HP Mini 2133 in case it is relev
Hi John,
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 10:50:16AM +0100, john lewis wrote:
> startx.co.uk ("John Lewis Trading As:") is delegated to two
> nameservers, however both delegated nameservers are missing in the zone
I like using Squishywishywoo for checking out DNS issues:
http://www.squish.net/dnscheck/
** Kelly Dunlop [2010-05-05 11:06]:
> On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 10:50:16AM +0100, john lewis wrote:
> > Until yesterday (evening?) we were able to connect to our Geneweb
> > database at http://startx.co.uk:2317/Kingsclere without any problems.
> >
> > Just before 9 pm last evening my wife told me s
Hello John,
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 10:50:16AM +0100, john lewis wrote:
> Until yesterday (evening?) we were able to connect to our Geneweb
> database at http://startx.co.uk:2317/Kingsclere without any problems.
>
> Just before 9 pm last evening my wife told me she could no longer
> connect to t
Until yesterday (evening?) we were able to connect to our Geneweb
database at http://startx.co.uk:2317/Kingsclere without any problems.
Just before 9 pm last evening my wife told me she could no longer
connect to that URL and was getting a message about 'unable to connect
to server'
I was at th
Hi all,
Thanks for all the advice. I think I will go with the 64-bit system
after all. :)
Chris
--
Chris Smith
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL:
24 matches
Mail list logo
