Thank you all, I'll take a look at the suggestions.
I've got a follow up question too. How easy is it to switch registrars
if I wanted to switch my existing domains too? Or rather how easy is it
to switch the mail addresses I've got set up, as I presume switching the
domain registrations is re
HP have gone and released an all-in-one desktop, with Ubuntu 12.10!
http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2013/03/hp-launch-ubuntu-all-in-one-pc-for-349
It's £349 and available here:
http://h20386.www2.hp.com/UKStore/Merch/Product.aspx?id=ECC_BUNDLE_3836543&opt=&sel=PCDT
Rich
--
Please post to: Hampshir
On Tue, 5 Mar 2013 13:26:57 +
"Dr A. J. Trickett" wrote:
Hello Dr,
>Depressingly lots of houses built after the regulations were
>changed don't meet the regulations... However the assesment is a
Terrible, isn't it? I can't even drill a hole in the wall without the
local authority whingin
Brad,
>
> >the inspectors came they marked the "cavity wall insulation" entry as
> >"presumed not". They didn't even ask.
>
> They seem to always do that - even when the property was built *after*
> the time when insulation became a requirement, as mine was. Stupid..
>
Depressingly lots
On Tue, 05 Mar 2013 at 09:49:37AM +, James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
> >> Our house was built in 1936 and has a EPC rating of "E" and an estimated
> >> energy use of 314 kWh/m2/year. Last year we ran the house at an actual
> >> energy use of 85 kWh/m2/year. What the inspector said and what is real
Gordon,
>
> I remember a landlord friend complaining that he'd done all the
> cavity wall and loft insulation, etc., that the authorities
> demanded, then when the inspectors came they marked the "cavity wall
> insulation" entry as "presumed not". They didn't even ask.
Our certificate was full
On Tue, 05 Mar 2013 09:26:29 +
Gordon Scott wrote:
Hello Gordon,
>the inspectors came they marked the "cavity wall insulation" entry as
>"presumed not". They didn't even ask.
They seem to always do that - even when the property was built *after*
the time when insulation became a requireme
On 5 March 2013 09:26, Gordon Scott wrote:
> On 04/03/2013 23:27, Dr A. J. Trickett wrote:
>>
>>
>> Our house was built in 1936 and has a EPC rating of "E" and an estimated
>> energy use of 314 kWh/m2/year. Last year we ran the house at an actual
>> energy use of 85 kWh/m2/year. What the inspector
On 05/03/13 09:10, Paul Stimpson wrote:
>
> I would recommend gandi.net to you. A decent and honest company.
>
+1 for gandi.net, I use them for most of my domains and have been very
stable.
They also meet your mail requirements:
https://www.gandi.net/domain/mail
I also use heartinternet.co.uk f
On 04/03/2013 23:27, Dr A. J. Trickett wrote:
Our house was built in 1936 and has a EPC rating of "E" and an
estimated energy use of 314 kWh/m2/year. Last year we ran the house at
an actual energy use of 85 kWh/m2/year. What the inspector said and
what is real are quite different. I'm just cu
I would recommend gandi.net to you. A decent and honest company. They will sell
you a domain and you have vinyl over it and which services you want from them
and which you will provide yourself.
Bests,
Paul.
--
Sent from Kaiten Mail on Android. Please excuse my brevity.--
Please post to: Hamps
On 05/03/2013 08:40, Tim wrote:
On 04/03/13 23:02, Leo wrote:
I currently use 1and1 as my registrar and email provider, but am not
overly impressed with them. Can anyone recommend another for the next
domain I want to register? The main functionality I want is
registration (and auto re-registr
On 04/03/13 23:02, Leo wrote:
I currently use 1and1 as my registrar and email provider, but am not
overly impressed with them. Can anyone recommend another for the next
domain I want to register? The main functionality I want is
registration (and auto re-registration) and email provision. Email
13 matches
Mail list logo
