Re: [Hampshire] Wiki broken?

2013-04-25 Thread Tony Wood
:-) Tony Wood On 25/04/13 10:00, Chris Dennis wrote: On 24/04/13 22:40, Lisi wrote: On Wednesday 24 April 2013 19:22:00 Chris Dennis wrote: Done! User name: deleted Password: deleted Did you really mean to publicise those, Chris? Lisi Yes, it's called 'reverse

Re: [Hampshire] Wiki broken?

2013-04-24 Thread Alan Pope
On 09/11/12 18:39, Chris Dennis wrote: On 09/11/12 18:23, Tim Brocklehurst wrote: On 05/11/12 15:46, Chris Dennis wrote: So, this is the plan. I've re-enabled new accounts, which means that anyone can create an account. BUT, only users who are members of the 'editors' group can change

Re: [Hampshire] Wiki broken?

2013-04-24 Thread Tim Brocklehurst
Resurrecting a 5 month old thread.. I'd still like to edit a page on the wiki. Alternatively I'll move the content somewhere else where I can edit it, which makes me sad. What's the solution to this? Alan, Either register from the main page (http://www.hants.lug.org.uk/), or contact Chris

Re: [Hampshire] Wiki broken?

2013-04-24 Thread Chris Dennis
On 24/04/13 12:59, Tim Brocklehurst wrote: Resurrecting a 5 month old thread.. I'd still like to edit a page on the wiki. Alternatively I'll move the content somewhere else where I can edit it, which makes me sad. What's the solution to this? Alan, Either register from the main page

Re: [Hampshire] Wiki broken?

2013-04-24 Thread Alan Pope
On 24/04/13 15:12, Chris Dennis wrote: Yes, the old wiki still requires manual intervention (by me) to create accounts for editing pages. I'm more than happy to do that for people who ask. Consider yourself asked. If anyone can tell me how to improve that situation, I'd love to hear from

Re: [Hampshire] Wiki broken?

2013-04-24 Thread Chris Dennis
On 24/04/13 17:02, Alan Pope wrote: On 24/04/13 15:12, Chris Dennis wrote: Yes, the old wiki still requires manual intervention (by me) to create accounts for editing pages. I'm more than happy to do that for people who ask. Consider yourself asked. I'll send you the details as soon as I

Re: [Hampshire] Wiki broken?

2013-04-24 Thread Chris Dennis
On 24/04/13 17:02, Alan Pope wrote: On 24/04/13 15:12, Chris Dennis wrote: Yes, the old wiki still requires manual intervention (by me) to create accounts for editing pages. I'm more than happy to do that for people who ask. Consider yourself asked. Done! User name: AlanPope Password:

Re: [Hampshire] Wiki broken?

2013-04-24 Thread Paul Tansom
** Chris Dennis cgden...@btinternet.com [2013-04-24 19:23]: On 24/04/13 17:02, Alan Pope wrote: On 24/04/13 15:12, Chris Dennis wrote: Yes, the old wiki still requires manual intervention (by me) to create accounts for editing pages. I'm more than happy to do that for people who ask.

Re: [Hampshire] Wiki broken?

2013-04-24 Thread Anton Piatek
lol On 24 April 2013 19:31, Paul Tansom p...@aptanet.com wrote: ** Chris Dennis cgden...@btinternet.com [2013-04-24 19:23]: On 24/04/13 17:02, Alan Pope wrote: On 24/04/13 15:12, Chris Dennis wrote: Yes, the old wiki still requires manual intervention (by me) to create accounts for editing

Re: [Hampshire] Wiki broken?

2013-04-24 Thread Alan Pope
On 24/04/13 19:38, Chris Dennis wrote: How embarrassing! I was sure I'd sent that just to Alan. I've changed the password, and I'll try to tell Alan the new one a bit more quietly. Thanks for pointing that out, Paul. That made my evening :) -- Alan Pope Engineering Manager Canonical -

Re: [Hampshire] Wiki broken?

2012-11-11 Thread Petyr B
Sounds like someone is knocking on your walls trying to find a weak spot.  I suggest going thru your logs and trying to see if they have been careless enough not to hide their ips.  Also check logs for malformed data being their at you and patch any you find. :-) I am pretty sure you have

Re: [Hampshire] Wiki broken?

2012-11-09 Thread Chris Dennis
On 08/11/12 18:31, Chris Dennis wrote: On 05/11/12 21:31, Alan Bell wrote: On 05/11/12 15:46, Chris Dennis wrote: Yes. Adam had to shut down most access to the wiki because of all the spam. And my very brief reading of the MoinMoin documentation suggests that the system wasn't designed to

Re: [Hampshire] Wiki broken?

2012-11-09 Thread Michael James Daffin
Be wary about this, it is common for crackers to break into a site and leave backdoors on the site to be sold/exploited later. This could be an indication of that. On Nov 9, 2012 4:13 PM, Chris Dennis cgden...@btinternet.com wrote: On 08/11/12 18:31, Chris Dennis wrote: On 05/11/12 21:31,

Re: [Hampshire] Wiki broken?

2012-11-09 Thread Tim Brocklehurst
On 05/11/12 15:46, Chris Dennis wrote: So, this is the plan. I've re-enabled new accounts, which means that anyone can create an account. BUT, only users who are members of the 'editors' group can change things. If you want to be an editor, create an account, and let me know your user

Re: [Hampshire] Wiki broken?

2012-11-09 Thread Chris Dennis
On 09/11/12 18:23, Tim Brocklehurst wrote: On 05/11/12 15:46, Chris Dennis wrote: So, this is the plan. I've re-enabled new accounts, which means that anyone can create an account. BUT, only users who are members of the 'editors' group can change things. If you want to be an editor, create

Re: [Hampshire] Wiki broken?

2012-11-08 Thread Alan Bell
On 05/11/12 15:46, Chris Dennis wrote: Yes. Adam had to shut down most access to the wiki because of all the spam. And my very brief reading of the MoinMoin documentation suggests that the system wasn't designed to be secure: it's open to either everyone or no-one (except for

Re: [Hampshire] Wiki broken?

2012-11-08 Thread Chris Dennis
On 05/11/12 21:31, Alan Bell wrote: On 05/11/12 15:46, Chris Dennis wrote: Yes. Adam had to shut down most access to the wiki because of all the spam. And my very brief reading of the MoinMoin documentation suggests that the system wasn't designed to be secure: it's open to either everyone