(once again I apologize for top-posting)
Would you mind listing what you change (and if possible a reason)?
I've grown up with *BSD-style environments (started out on NetBSD 1.2 back in
the 90's on non-x86 hardware), and I keep beeing "amazed" by Linux.
While some vendors and distros are doing g
http://itsnotarumor.com/rock/public/files/02gfns.html";>
http://itsnotarumor.com/rock/public/files/02gfns.html
Hi,
I'm looking for an "easy" way to setup simple tcp port-forwarding with
haproxy alongside normal load-balancing. Thing is, the incoming ports
are random within 5900-6000 so I need to forward the same incoming
port to the backend(s). I tried doing this with a "listen" directive
and with "fronten
Timh,
If you don't specify the destination port on the backend servers then
it defaults to using the port the traffic requested.
2012/4/2 Timh Bergström :
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for an "easy" way to setup simple tcp port-forwarding with
> haproxy alongside normal load-balancing. Thing is, the in
Thanks, I wonder why it doesn't work for me then, how do you solve "server
checking" when no backend or server port is configured?
The vnc servers is created on the fly so theyre not always running.
//T
On Monday, April 2, 2012, Malcolm Turnbull wrote:
> Timh,
>
> If you don't specify the desti
Hello,
I am a new happy haproxy user.
Unfortunately, despite the powerful configuration system and regular expressions
support, the "balance uri" directive is still using a very rigid way of
splitting
a URI (length from start + splitting on slash only) to feed it to the hashing
engine.
Is ther
On 2 April 2012 17:25, Sameh Ghane wrote:
>
> Is there anything I missed ? Like setting a specific request header which
> would
> be the result of a regexp on the URI, and balancing on that header ?
I don't understand what you've written. Could you say it again, but differently?
Some examples wo
Le (On) Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 06:32:31PM +0100, Jonathan Matthews ecrivit
(wrote):
> On 2 April 2012 17:25, Sameh Ghane wrote:
> >
> > Is there anything I missed ? Like setting a specific request header which
> > would
> > be the result of a regexp on the URI, and balancing on that header ?
>
>
Hi,
You have a "port" parameter to tell on which port the health check
have to be performed.
cheers
2012/4/2 Timh Bergström :
> Thanks, I wonder why it doesn't work for me then, how do you solve "server
> checking" when no backend or server port is configured?
>
> The vnc servers is created on t
> OK just to be sure, you should *really* make your changes on 1.5-dev, not
> 1.4. 1.4 is in deep maintenance mode and I don't intend to merge such
> changes there, as every time I did I caused some regressions.
I'm in process of porting my patch to 1.5. I don't particularly want
to run 1.5 in pro
On 2 April 2012 19:28, Sameh Ghane wrote:
> Le (On) Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 06:32:31PM +0100, Jonathan Matthews ecrivit
> (wrote):
>> On 2 April 2012 17:25, Sameh Ghane wrote:
>> >
>> > Is there anything I missed ? Like setting a specific request header which
>> > would
>> > be the result of a reg
---
include/types/stream_interface.h |1 +
src/dumpstats.c |2 ++
src/peers.c |3 +--
src/stream_interface.c |2 +-
4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/types/stream_interface.h b/include/types/stream
---
src/dumpstats.c |4 ++--
src/proto_tcp.c |2 +-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/dumpstats.c b/src/dumpstats.c
index 44117d9..74ad966 100644
--- a/src/dumpstats.c
+++ b/src/dumpstats.c
@@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ static int stats_sock_parse_request(struct stre
---
include/types/stream_interface.h |2 ++
src/frontend.c |1 +
src/proto_tcp.c |1 +
3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/types/stream_interface.h b/include/types/stream_interface.h
index d59e3fb..16af806 100644
---
---
doc/configuration.txt| 22
include/proto/dumpstats.h|5 +
include/types/stream_interface.h |5 +
src/dumpstats.c | 242 +-
src/session.c|9 ++
5 files changed, 280 insertions(+), 3
Hi,
May I ask you why you want absolutely not hash this part?
I clearly don't understand, and I don't see any disadvantage of
hashing a full URI.
Maybe passing the argument you want to hash in the query string, then
use the balance param algorithm may help.
cheers
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 8:28 P
Hi Aman,
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 03:34:08PM -0700, Aman Gupta wrote:
> > OK just to be sure, you should *really* make your changes on 1.5-dev, not
> > 1.4. 1.4 is in deep maintenance mode and I don't intend to merge such
> > changes there, as every time I did I caused some regressions.
>
> I'm in
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Aman,
>
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 03:34:08PM -0700, Aman Gupta wrote:
>> > OK just to be sure, you should *really* make your changes on 1.5-dev, not
>> > 1.4. 1.4 is in deep maintenance mode and I don't intend to merge such
>> > changes th
18 matches
Mail list logo