Re: priority servers in an instance

haproxy with mongrels, but have you considered moving your rails apps to Apache2 and Passenger (available at http://www.modrails.com)? It will probably save you many headaches compared running mongrel or thin. Best regards Erik -- Erik Gulliksson, erik.gulliks...@diino.net System Administrator, D

Re: Do I need more than HAProxy for SSL webserver

e with PUT and POST requests. Did you bump into this or is it perhaps fixed in newer nginx? Regards Erik Gulliksson -- Erik Gulliksson, erik.gulliks...@diino.net System Administrator, Diino AB http://www.diino.com

Re: Do I need more than HAProxy for SSL webserver

for handling lots of connections. Also there seems to be no way to reload stunnel configuration without killing the process which would then drop current connections, but maybe I am missing something here. Cheers! Erik -- Erik Gulliksson, erik.gulliks...@diino.net System Administrator, Diino AB http://www.diino.com

Throughput degradation after upgrading haproxy from 1.3.22 to 1.4.1

Encrypted password support via crypt(3): yes Available polling systems : sepoll : pref=400, test result OK epoll : pref=300, test result OK poll : pref=200, test result OK select : pref=150, test result OK Total: 4 (4 usable), will use sepoll. Best regards Erik Gulliksso

Re: Throughput degradation after upgrading haproxy from 1.3.22 to 1.4.1

se of MSG_MORE. If this fixes the > issue for you, I'll probably have to add an option to disable this > packet merging for very specific applications. I tried to comment out the line above as instructed, but it made no noticable change. As stated above, I will try to reproduce the problem

Re: Throughput degradation after upgrading haproxy from 1.3.22 to 1.4.1

hen giving it some thought, I guess this is the expected behaviour for what stunnel actually is supposed to do. So, for now I'll stick with "option httpclose" for a while longer... Keep up the good work! Best regards Erik -- Erik Gulliksson, erik.gulliks...@diino.net System Administrator, Diino AB http://www.diino.com

Re: Throughput degradation after upgrading haproxy from 1.3.22 to 1.4.1

rror. There may be other products out there I have not yet tried however. What I am looking for in my SSL-decoding solution is support for TE:chunked, http keep-alive, option to set "SSL engine" (for h/w acceleration), soft-reconfiguration (something like haproxy's "-sf&q

Re: Throughput degradation after upgrading haproxy from 1.3.22 to 1.4.1

h "option forceclose" now, as it will release > the server connection earlier. OK, I will try to enable "option forceclose" as well. Again, thanks for all the help. Best regards Erik -- Erik Gulliksson, erik.gulliks...@diino.net System Administrator, Diino AB http://www.diino.com