(great thread.)
On Thursday, June 21, 2012, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 01:51:12AM -0400, Martin Konecny wrote:
Hi Willy,
I can only answer your question by saying that other clients that use
this
protocol but replace ICE/1.0 with HTTP/1.0 have no problem with HAProxy.
Its toally dirty, but we have our wrapper check for such exceptions, then
force a listener if an haproxy listener doesn't exist after a
reload/restart to the existing (now dead) haproxy process. I've grown to
not fret about such dirty when running haproxy dev branch, but ymmv.
One more general q: Any measurable latency between the HAProxy and Squid boxes?
2012/4/14 Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu:
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 04:00:39AM +0700, Thái Lę Trí wrote:
I have trouble with HAproxy.
using HAproxy for load balance and backend have 3 squid proxy. But the time
to
}
We have many servers for different developers, the rules may be complex
and changing.
It is not elegant to define hundreds of backend.
*From:* Carlo Flores l...@js.la
*Date:* 2012-03-15 14:45
*To:* wsq003 wsq...@sina.com
*CC:* haproxy haproxy@formilux.org
*Subject:* Re: How to select
See the src entry under section 7.5.1 of the HAProxy docs. There's
actually many examples of this acl you'll find throughout the doc. You'd
use something like this:
frontend http
bind :80
mode http
acl always_s01 src 217.192.7.0/24
use_backend s01 if always_s01
default_backend pool
Hey Michele.
I'm confused as to how show stat is correct...
According to the statistics I have retrieved by means of show stat after
enabling disabling servers, it looks like the socket is working as
expected.
But your script does not correspond to this even though it uses show
stat...
After
John,
Where's the documentation for your patch? I'm up for playing with this
neat idea even if we don't use it in Prod.
Might hook in some suff to haproxyctl if you can output a version
number/patch/something so the ctl script can recognize when someone is
using this version...
On Mon, Feb 6,
with Willy's upstream copy.
carlo flores ca...@petalphile.com wrote:
John,
Where's the documentation for your patch? I'm up for playing with this
neat idea even if we don't use it in Prod.
Might hook in some suff to haproxyctl if you can output a version
number/patch/something so the ctl
I can appreciate having to keep a slow application layer highly available
via long timeouts, but as a suggestion:
a) keep lots of available sockets open and think about the timeout wait
sysctl reuse/recycle variables
And
b) think about creating a simple page (in whatever language and
Thanks much Willy. We are moving forward with commenting this out in our
installs, FYI.
On Monday, September 26, 2011, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
Hi Carlo,
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 04:18:38PM -0700, carlo flores wrote:
Just wondering if this is enabled in Makefile.bsd for a particular
Just wondering if this is enabled in Makefile.bsd for a particular reason?
We're building automated installers and noticed it is commented out in
other Makefiles but is still active for BSD installs.
Maybe we'll be able to update the version in OpenBSD'd ports, too...
Thanks!
I'm seeing this in and playing with 1.4.18, by the way.
Thanks!
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 4:18 PM, carlo flores ca...@petalphile.com wrote:
Just wondering if this is enabled in Makefile.bsd for a particular reason?
We're building automated installers and noticed it is commented out in
other
-- haproxyctl
(LoadError)
from /etc/init.d/haproxyctl:17
On 22 September 2011 21:42, carlo flores ca...@petalphile.com wrote:
Here's an HAProxy ctl/init script that includes Nagios and Cloudkick
checks (to the UNIX socket and lsof listeners) to go with the regular
start/stop/init stuff: https
Here's an HAProxy ctl/init script that includes Nagios and Cloudkick checks
(to the UNIX socket and lsof listeners) to go with the regular
start/stop/init stuff: https://github.com/flores/haproxyctl
The advantage of using a wrapper around the UNIX socket is you can also add
checks for available
Hey Willy, all.
We are playing with Mongrel2 and found this post from Zed interesting and --
for myself -- surprising: http://sheddingbikes.com/posts/1280829388.html
Have you had a chance to read, think about, or respond to it with regards to
poll vs epoll in HAProxy versus the number of active
To add to this is a great automated tool and ideas from The Chicago Tribune
called Bees With Machine Guns, which spins up n AWS micro instances to push
traffic to the target server.
https://github.com/newsapps/beeswithmachineguns
My CTO makes the argument that connections/s or sessions/s don't
and libwww.
cheers :)
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 9:08 AM, carlo flores ca...@petalphile.com wrote:
To add to this is a great automated tool and ideas from The Chicago
Tribune
called Bees With Machine Guns, which spins up n AWS micro instances to
push
traffic to the target server.
https
I love the suggestion and offer to administrate the mail list (and I too
volunteer), but, ultimately: whatever. SPAM is part of most any list and the
more time the guys spend on one of the best pieces of software in the world,
the better. I happily skip these messages in hopes Willy Cyril and the
Looks trivial to fork this and turn the regex.txt into a script. I'm up for
taking that once we have free cycles at work (couple days max).
https://github.com/tmslnz/HAProxy_Markdown
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 06:43:14PM +0530,
Hi Guy,
If you only want HAProxy to queue connections and not send that immediate
ok any longer, check out how these folks are doing it to queue to MySQL.
http://flavio.tordini.org/a-more-stable-mysql-with-haproxy/comment-page-1
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 5:15 PM, g...@desgames.com
Your last suggestion is what are suits call auto-scaling, and the idea of
doing that with HAProxy is really appealing and would be a big plus for us.
As a test tomorrow with 1.4.10/stable idea, let's say a pool of 10 servers
had two servers with zero weight, and a script watching the unix socket
As an example, our shop extends your wish list with the ability to pull
stats from the UNIX socket and trigger alerts via Nagios or Cloudkick ass we
need. If you want it, easy to add whatever you need to a fork of this.
We'll commit it back in: https://github.com/flores/haproxyctl
I believe you
I've never seen this on one of our HAProxy benchmarks. We usually use siege
and our own application (also testing the HTTP applications/user behavior).
For clarity, you do not see timeouts when going direct to, say, nginx
serving hi on port 80? I ask because maybe this is really a ulimit or
Same line of thought: perhaps there's a process already running listening on
your target port. I'd suggest you do a netstat or lsof to see if Karl is
right and it is an old HAProxy. (Just as likely to be another process.)
For example, if HAProxy is to listen on port 80...
# netstat -ano |grep
: [FAILED]
Starting HAproxy: [ALERT] 004/060455 (8011) : Starting proxy webfarm:
cannot bind socket
[FAILED]
Thanks
On 05-01-2011 06:00, carlo flores wrote:
Same line of thought: perhaps there's a process already
Thank you Cyril and bartavelle!
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
Hi guys,
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 07:54:19PM +0100, Cyril Bonté wrote:
Le mercredi 8 décembre 2010 13:11:10, Craig a écrit :
Am 06.12.2010 22:31, Cyril Bonté wrote:
I don't know if you
Hi folks.
For our company's convenience, we prefer to have our HAProxy unit
script also allow us to talk to the stats socket. We also do a couple
other things, like show connections with a status argument. Perhaps
you can use it too.
Code and readme here: https://github.com/flores/haproxyctl
A
Thanks, Willy!
I am especially excited about the new per-URL statistics, super especially
for the average time metric. However, I can't use these flags with my build
of 1.4.9 from source.
# /usr/local/sbin/haproxy -u -uc -ue -ut -ua -uto -uaoHA-Proxy version 1.4.9
2010/10/28
Copyright 2000-2010
... sorry about those broken new lines. Here's the gist:
http://gist.github.com/652558
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Carlo Flores ca...@petalphile.com wrote:
Thanks, Willy!
I am especially excited about the new per-URL statistics, super especially
for the average time metric. However
D'oh! Thank you, Cyril!
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Cyril Bonté cyril.bo...@free.fr wrote:
Le vendredi 29 octobre 2010 01:27:30, Carlo Flores a écrit :
I am especially excited about the new per-URL statistics, super
especially
for the average time metric. However, I can't use
How about passing healthcheck.cluster6.corp.amiestreet.com for the option
httpchk, and also have the Apache VirtualHosts recognize healthcheck as a
ServerAlias? The idea here is your healthcheck will be standardized to each
host in the cluster, which you'll also want when you split these hosts,
31 matches
Mail list logo
