Re: ARM(64) builds

вс, 19 янв. 2020 г. в 13:13, Martin Grigorov : > Hi, > > On Sat, Jan 18, 2020, 22:10 Илья Шипицин wrote: > >> tests on ARM64 randomly fail >> https://travis-ci.com/chipitsine/haproxy/jobs/277236120 >> >> (after restart there's a good chance to success) >> > > I have the same observation on

Re: ARM(64) builds

Hi, On Sat, Jan 18, 2020, 22:10 Илья Шипицин wrote: > tests on ARM64 randomly fail > https://travis-ci.com/chipitsine/haproxy/jobs/277236120 > > (after restart there's a good chance to success) > I have the same observation on TravisCI. I think the reason is that their arm64 instances are less

Re: ARM(64) builds

tests on ARM64 randomly fail https://travis-ci.com/chipitsine/haproxy/jobs/277236120 (after restart there's a good chance to success) сб, 18 янв. 2020 г. в 09:52, Martin Grigorov : > > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 11:17 PM Martin Grigorov < > martin.grigo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri,

Re: ARM(64) builds

On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 11:17 PM Martin Grigorov wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2020, 23:12 William Lallemand > wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 08:50:27PM +0200, Martin Grigorov wrote: >> > Testing with haproxy version: 2.2-dev0-70c5b0-123 >> >> This binary was built with code from 1 week

Re: ARM(64) builds

On Fri, Jan 17, 2020, 23:12 William Lallemand wrote: > On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 08:50:27PM +0200, Martin Grigorov wrote: > > Testing with haproxy version: 2.2-dev0-70c5b0-123 > > This binary was built with code from 1 week ago, it's normal that the test > does > not work since the fix was made

Re: ARM(64) builds

On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 08:50:27PM +0200, Martin Grigorov wrote: > Testing with haproxy version: 2.2-dev0-70c5b0-123 This binary was built with code from 1 week ago, it's normal that the test does not work since the fix was made this week. -- William Lallemand

Re: ARM(64) builds

On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 08:50:27PM +0200, Martin Grigorov wrote: > Hi William, > > Please find attached the output. > > this two lines look bad in it: > > *** h1 debug|[ALERT] 016/184150 (7188) : parsing [cur--1:0] : proxy > 'MASTER', another server named 'cur--1' was already defined at line

Re: ARM(64) builds

Hi Илья, On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 5:43 PM Илья Шипицин wrote: > > > пт, 17 янв. 2020 г. в 19:33, Martin Grigorov : > >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 4:13 PM Martin Grigorov < >> martin.grigo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Today's build consistently fails on my ARM64 VM: >>> >>>

Re: ARM(64) builds

Hi William, On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 4:46 PM William Lallemand wrote: > On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 04:33:22PM +0200, Martin Grigorov wrote: > > > > git bisect blaims this commit: > > > > 25b569302167e71b32e569a2366027e8e320e80a is the first bad commit > > commit

Re: ARM(64) builds

пт, 17 янв. 2020 г. в 19:33, Martin Grigorov : > > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 4:13 PM Martin Grigorov > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Today's build consistently fails on my ARM64 VM: >> >> ## Starting vtest ## >> Testing with haproxy version:

Re: ARM(64) builds

On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 04:33:22PM +0200, Martin Grigorov wrote: > > git bisect blaims this commit: > > 25b569302167e71b32e569a2366027e8e320e80a is the first bad commit > commit 25b569302167e71b32e569a2366027e8e320e80a > Author: William Lallemand > Date: Tue Jan 14 15:38:43 2020 +0100 > >

Re: ARM(64) builds

On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 4:13 PM Martin Grigorov wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's build consistently fails on my ARM64 VM: > > ## Starting vtest ## > Testing with haproxy version: 2.2-dev0-70c5b0-123 > #top TEST reg-tests/mcli/mcli_start_progs.vtc

Re: ARM(64) builds

Hi all, Today's build consistently fails on my ARM64 VM: ## Starting vtest ## Testing with haproxy version: 2.2-dev0-70c5b0-123 #top TEST reg-tests/mcli/mcli_start_progs.vtc FAILED (3.004) exit=2 1 tests failed, 0 tests skipped, 34 tests

Re: ARM(64) builds

привет! пт, 17 янв. 2020 г. в 11:42, Martin Grigorov : > Привет Илья, > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 10:37 AM Илья Шипицин > wrote: > >> >> >> чт, 16 янв. 2020 г. в 13:26, Martin Grigorov : >> >>> Hi Илья, >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 10:19 AM Илья Шипицин >>> wrote: >>> Hello,

Re: ARM(64) builds

Привет Илья, On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 10:37 AM Илья Шипицин wrote: > > > чт, 16 янв. 2020 г. в 13:26, Martin Grigorov : > >> Hi Илья, >> >> On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 10:19 AM Илья Шипицин >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Hello, Martin! >>> >>> btw, just curious, how is Apache Foundation (or you personally)

Re: ARM(64) builds

чт, 16 янв. 2020 г. в 13:37, Илья Шипицин : > > > чт, 16 янв. 2020 г. в 13:26, Martin Grigorov : > >> Hi Илья, >> >> On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 10:19 AM Илья Шипицин >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Hello, Martin! >>> >>> btw, just curious, how is Apache Foundation (or you personally) >>> interested in all

Re: ARM(64) builds

чт, 16 янв. 2020 г. в 13:26, Martin Grigorov : > Hi Илья, > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 10:19 AM Илья Шипицин > wrote: > >> >> Hello, Martin! >> >> btw, just curious, how is Apache Foundation (or you personally) >> interested in all that ? >> please do not blame me, I really like to know. >> > ok,

Re: ARM(64) builds

Hi Илья, On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 10:19 AM Илья Шипицин wrote: > > Hello, Martin! > > btw, just curious, how is Apache Foundation (or you personally) interested > in all that ? > please do not blame me, I really like to know. > > @apache.org is just one of my several emails. And it is the

Re: ARM(64) builds

Hello, Martin! btw, just curious, how is Apache Foundation (or you personally) interested in all that ? please do not blame me, I really like to know. чт, 16 янв. 2020 г. в 12:32, Martin Grigorov : > Hello HAProxy developers, > > At work we are going to use more and more ARM64 based servers

ARM(64) builds

Hello HAProxy developers, At work we are going to use more and more ARM64 based servers and HAProxy is one of the main products we rely on. So I went checking whether HAProxy project has a CI environment for testing on ARM architecture. I've found this recent discussion: