Re: "option httpchk" is reporting servers as down when they're not

2009-03-25 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Thomas, On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:57:41PM -0400, Allen, Thomas wrote: > Hi Willy, > > We now have HAProxy running over our freshly released website: > http://www.infrastructurereportcard.org/ thanks for the heads up ! > Thanks for this great piece of software and all the help! Only two > co

RE: "option httpchk" is reporting servers as down when they're not

2009-03-25 Thread Allen, Thomas
the admin. Thomas Allen Web Developer, ASCE 703.295.6355 -Original Message- From: Willy Tarreau [mailto:w...@1wt.eu] Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 5:26 PM To: Allen, Thomas Cc: Jeffrey 'jf' Lim; haproxy@formilux.org Subject: Re: "option httpchk" is reporting servers

Re: "option httpchk" is reporting servers as down when they're not

2009-03-09 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Thomas, On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 05:20:49PM -0400, Allen, Thomas wrote: > Hi Willy, > > Hm, changing to "60s" for each gave me 100% 504 errors, I removed all > three. Bad idea, I know, but at least it works then. then use "6", that's the old way of doing it :-) > I'm running 1.2.18 becau

RE: "option httpchk" is reporting servers as down when they're not

2009-03-09 Thread Allen, Thomas
Thanks, Thomas Allen Web Developer, ASCE 703.295.6355 -Original Message- From: Willy Tarreau [mailto:w...@1wt.eu] Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 4:58 PM To: Allen, Thomas Cc: Jeffrey 'jf' Lim; haproxy@formilux.org Subject: Re: "option httpchk" is reporting servers as do

Re: "option httpchk" is reporting servers as down when they're not

2009-03-09 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 04:15:34PM -0400, Allen, Thomas wrote: > I used the unit 'S' for my timeouts, as in > > clitimeout 60S > contimeout 60S > srvtimeout 60S > > Is that to be avoided? I assumed it meant "seconds." OK it's just a minor problem. You have to use a lower-case "s" : 60s. It's st

RE: "option httpchk" is reporting servers as down when they're not

2009-03-09 Thread Allen, Thomas
lto:w...@1wt.eu] Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 4:09 PM To: Allen, Thomas Cc: Jeffrey 'jf' Lim; haproxy@formilux.org Subject: Re: "option httpchk" is reporting servers as down when they're not Hi Thomas, just replying quick, as I'm in a hurry. On Mon, Mar 09, 2009

Re: "option httpchk" is reporting servers as down when they're not

2009-03-09 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Thomas, just replying quick, as I'm in a hurry. On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 04:01:29PM -0400, Allen, Thomas wrote: > That, along with specifying HTTP1.1, did it, so thanks! What should I > load into "Host:" ? It seems to work fine with "www", but I'd prefer to > use something I understand. Please

RE: "option httpchk" is reporting servers as down when they're not

2009-03-09 Thread Allen, Thomas
252/ Thanks, Thomas Allen Web Developer, ASCE 703.295.6355 -Original Message- From: Willy Tarreau [mailto:w...@1wt.eu] Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 1:39 PM To: Allen, Thomas Cc: Jeffrey 'jf' Lim; haproxy@formilux.org Subject: Re: "option httpchk" is reporting servers as

Re: "option httpchk" is reporting servers as down when they're not

2009-03-07 Thread Jeffrey 'jf' Lim
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 2:38 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 08:45:20AM -0500, Allen, Thomas wrote: >> Hi Jeff, >> >> The thing is that if I don't include the health check, the load balancer >> works fine and each server receives equal distribution. I have no idea

RE: "option httpchk" is reporting servers as down when they're not

2009-03-06 Thread Allen, Thomas
xy@formilux.org Subject: Re: "option httpchk" is reporting servers as down when they're not Hi Thomas, On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 08:45:20AM -0500, Allen, Thomas wrote: > Hi Jeff, > > The thing is that if I don't include the health check, the load balancer works fine and eac

Re: "option httpchk" is reporting servers as down when they're not

2009-03-06 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Thomas, On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 08:45:20AM -0500, Allen, Thomas wrote: > Hi Jeff, > > The thing is that if I don't include the health check, the load balancer > works fine and each server receives equal distribution. I have no idea why > the servers would be reported as "down" but still work

RE: "option httpchk" is reporting servers as down when they're not

2009-03-05 Thread Allen, Thomas
CE 703.295.6355 -Original Message- From: Jeffrey 'jf' Lim [mailto:jfs.wo...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 8:11 PM To: Allen, Thomas Cc: haproxy@formilux.org Subject: Re: "option httpchk" is reporting servers as down when they're not well, looks like ur servers are

Re: "option httpchk" is reporting servers as down when they're not

2009-03-04 Thread Jeffrey 'jf' Lim
t; 703.295.6355 > > -Original Message- > From: Jeffrey 'jf' Lim [mailto:jfs.wo...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 2:22 AM > To: Allen, Thomas > Cc: haproxy@formilux.org > Subject: Re: "option httpchk" is reporting servers as down when th

RE: "option httpchk" is reporting servers as down when they're not

2009-03-04 Thread Allen, Thomas
To: Allen, Thomas Cc: haproxy@formilux.org Subject: Re: "option httpchk" is reporting servers as down when they're not On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 4:05 AM, Allen, Thomas wrote: > Hi, > > I like the idea of having HAProxy check server health, but for some reason, > it reports

RE: "option httpchk" is reporting servers as down when they're not

2009-03-04 Thread Allen, Thomas
...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 2:22 AM To: Allen, Thomas Cc: haproxy@formilux.org Subject: Re: "option httpchk" is reporting servers as down when they're not On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 4:05 AM, Allen, Thomas wrote: > Hi, > > I like the idea of having HAProxy check serv

Re: "option httpchk" is reporting servers as down when they're not

2009-03-03 Thread Jeffrey 'jf' Lim
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 4:05 AM, Allen, Thomas wrote: > Hi, > > I like the idea of having HAProxy check server health, but for some reason, > it reports all of my servers as down. Here's my full config: > > listen http_proxy :80 >     mode http >     balance roundrobin >     option httpchk >     se