So far logs are clean and phones are quiet :)
I'd like to thank all ( in particular Przemyslaw and Viktor ) for the
great job done in the last months.
With the new "standard" make, clean, install build system is really
easy to import harbour as a standard Eclipse C Makefile project.
After the "-
Revision: 12635
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=12635&view=rev
Author: druzus
Date: 2009-10-02 00:19:28 + (Fri, 02 Oct 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-10-02 02:19 UTC+0200 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)
* harbour/include/hbrdd
Hi All,
Harbour Windows MSVC 2008 Itanium target was just tested OK.
It needs MSVC 2008 Team Suite (I just get hold of a legal copy).
(maybe 2005 works also, I don't know)
Brgds,
Viktor
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists
Hi Maurilio, David, All,
Does anyone of you want to remove config/global/watcom.mk hacks
added to workaround recently fixed GNU Make bugs?
Brgds,
Viktor
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/list
Please verify your BCC 6.20 installation, .cfg files. If these are
wrong,
you can still build all other versions of BCC (which happen to be
configured right).
I tried to rename import32.lib from BCC 6.20 to test if it's being
used and I got the following error:
bcc32.exe -q -tWM -w -w-sig- -Q
Revision: 12634
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=12634&view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-10-01 16:04:11 + (Thu, 01 Oct 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-10-01 17:58 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu)
* INSTALL
* utils/hbmk2/
Hi!
In my program, I want to allow users to add their modules.
This works very well with the modules in the HRB.
However, in modules HRB can not add blocks in C (for example, inserts the
code referring APIs ).
I found information that can be just as HRB, use DLLs.
In message:
http://www.nabble.c
Hi Viktor,
Message: 3
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 17:48:12 +0200
From: Viktor Szak?ts
Subject: Re: [Harbour] Compile Error Using BCC 6.20
To: "Harbour Project Main Developer List."
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes
> I don't have this c
I don't have this compiler. You'll have to find out
which bcc system lib holds this symbol.
grep WSAIoctl *.lib
Brgds,
Viktor
I have the following results:
Binary file import32.lib matches
Binary file intraweb_100_140.lib matches
Binary file ws2_32.lib matches
How can I include these libs t
Hi Viktor,
--
Message: 6
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 13:14:46 +0200
From: Viktor Szak?ts
Subject: Re: [Harbour] Re: Compile Error Using BCC 6.20
To: Viktor Szak?ts
Cc: "Harbour Project Main Developer List."
Message-ID: <24c252bf-3552-4073-a5a7-0177b93ea...@syenar
Sorry, but I've been asking some specific questions and now you
begin with a long tirade starting from 1999.
Let's cut it short:
Please correct me, if I'm wrong:
- There is 3.3.4 and lower, supporting COFF (or whatever else, let's
call it non-OMF)
- There is 3.3.5, which supports both OMF and
Viktor:
You reverted my first commit in Harbour SVN age :-)
I hope this was an temporary action because content of code changes are
self-explained
I was based in doc\howtosvn.txt and this does not work in my case
6) svn commit --editor-cmd notepad.exe --username sfuser
( svn report missing
Revision: 12633
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=12633&view=rev
Author: druzus
Date: 2009-10-01 12:12:14 + (Thu, 01 Oct 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-10-01 14:12 UTC+0200 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)
* harbour/source/rdd/db
I search a google wave invitation for massimo.belgrano atgmail.comThanks
--
Massimo Belgrano
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
Revision: 12632
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=12632&view=rev
Author: druzus
Date: 2009-10-01 11:22:17 + (Thu, 01 Oct 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-10-01 13:22 UTC+0200 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)
* harbour/include/hbrdd
Hi Mario,
I don't have this compiler. You'll have to find out
which bcc system lib holds this symbol.
grep WSAIoctl *.lib
Brgds,
Viktor
I have the following results:
Binary file import32.lib matches
Binary file intraweb_100_140.lib matches
Binary file ws2_32.lib matches
How can I include th
Hi Mario,
I don't have this compiler. You'll have to find out
which bcc system lib holds this symbol.
grep WSAIoctl *.lib
Brgds,
Viktor
I have the following results:
Binary file import32.lib matches
Binary file intraweb_100_140.lib matches
Binary file ws2_32.lib matches
How can I include th
Hi Viktor,
--
Message: 4
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 08:41:43 +0200
From: Viktor Szak?ts
Subject: Re: [Harbour] Compile Error Using BCC 6.20
To: "Harbour Project Main Developer List."
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=ye
>Case closed from my side.
You misread again
Just to clarify it, along time on some of your responses you tend to
suggest that I am against your work and that is not true. How easily
jumped in when seeing a different POV
Only avoid these suggestions, somebody may believe it is true and I
Viktor:
>No new value? Perhaps you missed the few thousand commits
>which went into make systems and hbmk2. (much of it went to
>OS/2 port, which essentially 3 ppl uses from the whole
>userbase, perhaps you should say 'thanks' instead of telling
>insults.)
>Case closed from my side.
You misread
Revision: 12631
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=12631&view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-10-01 09:58:44 + (Thu, 01 Oct 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-10-01 11:53 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu)
* config/global.mk
* util
Viktor Szakáts wrote:
Yes I know you do not want any new value in Harbour build scheme, but we
need only one to inform Harbour that we are building with alternative
library format in OS/2 platform
Does not need any specification of gcc3 or gcc4 as you think
No new value? Perhaps you missed the
Revision: 12630
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=12630&view=rev
Author: macdavid
Date: 2009-10-01 09:41:25 + (Thu, 01 Oct 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-10-01 4:25 UTC-0500 David Arturo Macias Corona (dmacias/at/mail.udg.mx)
* harbour/conf
[...] so still gcc3/gcc4 compiler names are better here.
I was thinking this matter had been completely clarified: we do not
need
gcc3/gcc4 separation
Along these messages I have seen how misunderstandings come again and
again even after they have been explained
You confused much of the expl
On Thu, 01 Oct 2009, Chen Kedem wrote:
Hi,
> The following patch was submitted to our bug tracker:
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2871130&group_id=681&atid=300681
> Anonymous wrote:
>
> In ads1.c (adsOpen function ca
Viktor:
[...]
did create a potential problem if users are mixing
gcc3 and gcc4.
One of them is not a specific need, it's simply
to INCOMPATIBLE groups of gcc compilers: <= 3.3 and >= 3.4.
Hence gcc3 and gcc4 seems like a logical choice here.
In hbmk2 compiler choice is managed by -compi
Hi Przemek (and All),
When you find some spare time, could you help in
converting these ANSI Windows API calls to native
ones?:
---
source/common/hbver.c:264: if( GetVersionExA( &osVer ) )
source/common/hbver.c:306: if( GetVersionExA
( ( OSVERSIONINFOA * ) &osV
27 matches
Mail list logo
