This is a reply for István
-- Forwarded message --
From: Bisz István istvan.b...@t-online.hu
Date: 2009/12/3
Subject: RE: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[13103] trunk/harbour
To: Harbour Project Main Developer List. harbour@harbour-project.org
Pritpal, if you have some spare
On Tue, 08 Dec 2009, David Arturo Macias Corona wrote:
Hi,
I expected not to fail in gtos2 and gtstd, but as gtstd failed, I
checked files and made confirmations to be sure, and at last I added
config\os2\watcom.mk content in message for clarity
Thank you very much.
It also means that
demoxbp.o:demoxbp.c:(.data+0x98): undefined reference to `HB_FUN_HBXBP_DEBUG'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
hbmk2: Error: Running linker. 1
2009/12/8 vouch...@users.sourceforge.net:
Revision: 13163
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=13163view=rev
Why use different project structure from hbmk2?
In xbase++ Visual Editor and make system use same project definition file
additional field on project definition structure can be used by visual
harbour and not by hbmk2
We maintain only one file for each project Seem me More easy do a
build in this
Przemek:
And this is the confirmation I was asking for.
Thank you very much for you help and all tests.
Now I can write self contain example which illustrates the problem.
I want to create two ones. The first one will allways fail exploiting
the problem inside OW CRTL and the scond one will fail
os2gcc434 and os2gcc442 are available
-
Paul Smedley has added GCC 4.3.4 on www.smedley.info/os2ports/ This the
OS/2 port of the GNU C Compiler.
Web page: os2ports.smedley.info/index.php
Download: download.smedley.info/gcc-4.3.4-os2-20090807.zip
Paul Smedley has updated the OS/2
Revision: 13164
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=13164view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-12-08 10:33:21 + (Tue, 08 Dec 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-12-08 11:30 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu)
+
Thanks!
Brgds,
Viktor
On 2009 Dec 8, at 08:45, vouch...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Revision: 13163
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=13163view=rev
Author: vouchcac
Date: 2009-12-08 07:45:20 + (Tue, 08 Dec 2009)
Log Message:
Revision: 13165
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=13165view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-12-08 10:44:31 + (Tue, 08 Dec 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-12-08 11:43 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu)
* src/macro/Makefile
-
Sorry to be a pest, but I'm still unable to build Harbour from latest SVN.
It seems that adding
#include hbset.h
to wapi_shellapi.c cures the problem.
Can I commit this change?
EMG
--
EMAG Software Homepage: http://www.emagsoftware.it
The EMG's ZX-Spectrum Page:
Revision: 13166
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=13166view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-12-08 11:03:40 + (Tue, 08 Dec 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-12-08 12:02 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu)
* include/Makefile
+
Hi,
Sorry to be a pest, but I'm still unable to build Harbour from latest SVN. It
seems that adding
#include hbset.h
to wapi_shellapi.c cures the problem.
Can I commit this change?
No thank you. The fix is already committed.
It wasn't a build error, just warnings, and
the binaries
Hi David,
Sorry, but I don't understand. Is this two messages, or one?
If you merge past messages with new ones without any indication
or date to signal it, it's rather hard to find out the essence
of such message.
If possible try to use regular forwarding and quoting methods,
since it's
Hi,
2009-12-08 12:02 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu)
* include/Makefile
+ include/hbwinuni.h
* contrib/hbwin/wapi_shellapi.c
* include/hbwince.h
+ Moved new UNICODE translation macros to separate header.
#define HB_RETSTR( str ) hb_retstr(
2009-12-08 12:02 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu)
* include/Makefile
+ include/hbwinuni.h
* contrib/hbwin/wapi_shellapi.c
* include/hbwince.h
+ Moved new UNICODE translation macros to separate header.
#define HB_RETSTR( str ) hb_retstr( hb_setGetOSCP(),
-Messaggio Originale-
Da: Viktor Szakáts harbour...@syenar.hu
A: Harbour Project Main Developer List. harbour@harbour-project.org
Data invio: martedì 8 dicembre 2009 12.12
Oggetto: Re: [Harbour] Still unable to build Harbour from latest SVN
No thank you. The fix is already
Revision: 13167
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=13167view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-12-08 12:17:08 + (Tue, 08 Dec 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-12-08 13:16 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu)
* include/hbwinuni.h
!
Revision: 13168
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=13168view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-12-08 12:39:32 + (Tue, 08 Dec 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-12-08 13:39 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu)
* contrib/hbcairo/core.c
Hi,
First you wrongly used hb_gcRefDec() instead of hb_gcRefFree().
hb_gcRefDec() does not free allocated block. It only decrease
number of reference counters. If you do not have any cross
references then this block will be cleanly freed on next GC
collect call. If you have such references
Hi,
2009-12-08 13:39 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu)
* contrib/hbcairo/core.c
+ Enabled HB_USE_ITEM mode which doesn't use Harbour internals.
Viktor, I do not think this is a good commit before questions about GC
API are finally solved.
Regards,
Mindaugas
2009-12-08 13:39 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu)
* contrib/hbcairo/core.c
+ Enabled HB_USE_ITEM mode which doesn't use Harbour internals.
Viktor, I do not think this is a good commit before questions about GC API
are finally solved.
As per Przemek's last commit, both
Hi,
Viktor Szakáts wrote:
2009-12-08 13:39 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu)
* contrib/hbcairo/core.c
+ Enabled HB_USE_ITEM mode which doesn't use Harbour internals.
Viktor, I do not think this is a good commit before questions about GC API are
finally solved.
As per
2009-12-08 13:39 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu)
* contrib/hbcairo/core.c
+ Enabled HB_USE_ITEM mode which doesn't use Harbour internals.
Viktor, I do not think this is a good commit before questions about GC API
are finally solved.
As per Przemek's last commit, both
With 4.6 qt are providing an opensource version of the Visual Studio
2008 binary packag
Qt 4.6 is pre-built using the shared C runtime (MD(d),msvcrtd.lib)
With /MD cflag we do Creates a multithreaded DLL using MSVCRT.lib.
according to list of MS complier flags and their descriptions.
Revision: 13169
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=13169view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-12-08 14:35:35 + (Tue, 08 Dec 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-12-08 15:34 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu)
*
Viktor Szakáts wrote:
I don't mind if a PHB_ITEM container is used if it makes sense, or makes
coding simpler or documented.
But it doesn't.
Emphasis (in this specific case) on 'documented'.
I want to see the second version (without extra item) working by default in
the final code, but
Why ?
Imo Is better a choice that allow use qt
If qt find advantage of using msvcrtd.lib can't be advantage also for harbour?
Wich Disadvantage in msvcrtd.lib?
2009/12/8 Viktor Szakáts harbour...@syenar.hu:
Can -MD be predefined by harbour for msvc?
No.
Though, you can easily define it
On Tue, 8 Dec 2009 15:28:18 +0100
Viktor Szakáts harbour...@syenar.hu wrote:
With 4.6 qt are providing an opensource version of the Visual Studio
2008 binary packag
Qt 4.6 is pre-built using the shared C runtime (MD(d),msvcrtd.lib)
With /MD cflag we do Creates a multithreaded DLL using
Why ?
Imo Is better a choice that allow use qt
Who says we don't allow QT usage? It can be used with
MinGW just as before (disregarding uncomfortable MinGW
installation of DWARF builds), and it's not us who define
the rules to use QT, it's Nokia.
If qt find advantage of using msvcrtd.lib
http://doc.trolltech.com/4.6/compiler-notes.html
http://doc.trolltech.com/4.6/deployment-windows.html
is /MD cflag the only way of make qt 4.6 and microsoft visual c 2008?
If you want to use default QT for MSVC binary build, yes.
Sorry to jump in. It is not true that we have to have all
Revision: 13170
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=13170view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-12-08 15:57:21 + (Tue, 08 Dec 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-12-08 16:56 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu)
* src/common/hbver.c
!
I try a sample of libharu and get an error
I need to know which libs are needed to compile libharu
I am using this line , based on hbp files from libharu
hbmk2 pdf_libharu -loohg -lhbhpdf -llibhpdf -lhbct -w3 -es2
what is wrong with that ?
Thanks
Bruno
Hi,
I try a sample of libharu and get an error
I need to know which libs are needed to compile libharu
I am using this line , based on hbp files from libharu
hbmk2 pdf_libharu -loohg -lhbhpdf -llibhpdf -lhbct -w3 -es2
what is wrong with that ?
You forgot to tell the error, so I
Hello All
Can someone provides a brief overview with syntax
how to use Create Process API?
The goal is like this:
1) HBIDE will create a .hbp file
2) Have to run a .bat to set the compiler dpendant environments
3) Will call HBMK2 which in turn adopt the env set in step 2.
4) HBIDE captures
thanks Viktor , the problem was some libs needed by OOHG
libHBWIN , libminiprint and libhbprinter
Bruno
2009/12/8 Viktor Szakáts harbour...@syenar.hu
Hi,
I try a sample of libharu and get an error
I need to know which libs are needed to compile libharu
I am using this line , based
1) HBIDE will create a .hbp file
2) Have to run a .bat to set the compiler dpendant environments
3) Will call HBMK2 which in turn adopt the env set in step 2.
4) HBIDE captures linker/compiler output to display in its interface
As I told you before (but all my such messages seems
ignored),
I talk to OOHG developers about that
thanks Viktor
Bruno
2009/12/8 Viktor Szakáts harbour...@syenar.hu
thanks Viktor , the problem was some libs needed by OOHG
libHBWIN , libminiprint and libhbprinter
In this case I recommend using utils/hbmk2/examples/oohg.hbc
as well, which will
Hi
vszakats wrote:
2009-12-08 15:34 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu)
* contrib/hbqt/hbqt_slots.cpp
* Further formatting and some variables renamed.
Again sorry for using such long lines, but - at least to me -
it reveals the slot logic so clearly.
Hi Massimo
Massimo Belgrano-3 wrote:
Why use different project structure from hbmk2?
Do you understand the intent and functioning of HBIDE ?
Also can you imagine what else will go into .hbi in future ?
And why you are comapring it with Xbase++ ?
.hbp project will be generated from
Hello Viktor
vszakats wrote:
2009-12-08 11:30 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu)
* Deleted commented debug calls.
Though this commit is a step forward in right direction,
I object in removing the debug calls, even those are commented ones.
Please remember, the whole
Massimo
Massimo Belgrano-3 wrote:
demoxbp.o:demoxbp.c:(.data+0x98): undefined reference to
`HB_FUN_HBXBP_DEBUG'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
hbmk2: Error: Running linker. 1
I do not understand why you send unnecessary message
to the list just to make a mess of a thread contents.
Again this is mistargetted message.
Istvan dis not asked for this and probably
he reads all the messages on this group.
Massimo Belgrano-3 wrote:
This is a reply for István
-- Forwarded message --
From: Bisz István istvan.b...@t-online.hu
Date: 2009/12/3
Subject: RE:
Hello Viktor
Viktor Szakáts wrote:
As I told you before (but all my such messages seems
ignored), there are examples for _exactly that_ in hbmk2.prg.
No, never ignored. Just wanted a fast entry into it.
hbmk2 sets envvars and calls external programs. Look for
hb_setenv() and
Hello Viktor
What minimum I supply to HBMK2 to generate the target ?
The scenario may be like this:
1) Many compilers installed
2) User selects the compiler to use
3) .hbp is generated
4) hbmk2 is called with what minimum parameters ?
Regards
Pritpal Bedi
--
View this message in context:
vszakats wrote:
2009-12-08 11:30 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu)
* Deleted commented debug calls.
Though this commit is a step forward in right direction,
I object in removing the debug calls, even those are commented ones.
Please remember, the whole protocol is not
2009/12/8 Pritpal Bedi bediprit...@hotmail.com
Hi Massimo
Massimo Belgrano-3 wrote:
Why use different project structure from hbmk2?
Do you understand the intent and functioning of HBIDE ?
Yes i am using xmate, Visual Studio 2008 and strong love hbide
Also can you imagine what else
Hi Pritpal,
Although for me hbide would be dropped as potential dev tool,
if it will set compiler dependent variables :( First of all
this makes it non-portable, difficult to maintain, or requires
double logic, etcetc.
_hbide would be dropped as potential dev tool_
Note: for me. I
Hello Viktor
What minimum I supply to HBMK2 to generate the target ?
The scenario may be like this:
1) Many compilers installed
We should assume that only one compiler is _configured_
at any given moment, regardless of the range of compilers
installed.
2) User selects the compiler
Revision: 13171
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=13171view=rev
Author: vouchcac
Date: 2009-12-09 02:31:02 + (Wed, 09 Dec 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-12-08 18:27 UTC-0800 Pritpal Bedi (prit...@vouchcac.com)
* contrib/hbide/hbide.prg
*
Revision: 13172
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=13172view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-12-09 03:09:59 + (Wed, 09 Dec 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-12-09 04:06 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu)
* include/hbwinuni.h
+
No need to use QProcess(), we have everything in Harbour core.
Yep, this is exactly what I want too.
Anyhow you added QProcess to slots system :(
Brgds,
Viktor
___
Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
Harbour@harbour-project.org
Viktor Szakáts wrote:
No need to use QProcess(), we have everything in Harbour core.
Yep, this is exactly what I want too.
Anyhow you added QProcess to slots system :(
Just to show the other benefits it renders.
I am simply short of process API in Harbour,
examined hbprocfn.c to
Hello Viktor
Viktor Szakáts wrote:
Note: for me. I have my own (actually quite simple) system
which sets tool environment, so any tool which tries to
replicate that, is just a nuisance and double effort for me,
since I have keep my system configured, plus keep hbide
configuration
Hi
Massimo Belgrano-3 wrote:
Yes from additional element like font , screen to structure definition
Fonts is on my TODO list but I could not understand
the concept of screen to structure definition ?
Only for having a model appreciated also by you
I admired Xbase++'s class
Hi,
I've just make few tests with OpenWatcom and checked how it generates
startup code for C++ static initialization.
It uses XI data segment to store list of pairs:
{ ushort 0x4000, void (*func_ptr)(void) }
So we can reach the same effect using #pragma(s), i.e.:
void init_func( void )
Przemek:
I made tests with
* $Id: ChangeLog 13162 2009-12-08 03:08:08Z druzus $
2009-12-08 04:07 UTC+0100 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)
and new os2gcc434, os2gcc442
Both gave 0 errors and lot of warnings which does not happen in os2gcc433
Warnings are below, so you can confirm
56 matches
Mail list logo
