Re: [Harbour] Re: hbpqtui class

Wednesday 27 January 2010 17:55:04 je Angel Pais napisal: A compiler without a GUI Framework leads it to nitche apps: Servers, console and cgi apps. A GUI Framework without compiler leads it to death because lack of support. If you do that then no new users will come here. This is not true.

[Harbour] -z switch seems to be overly anti-lazy

Hi! I noticed the -z switch allows to stop using shortcuts for .and. and .or. Clipper conditions. Without -z, if I do: eval(something) .or. .t. // will recognize that it's already true, and not make the eval When -z is enabled: .f. .and. eval(something) // will try to eval 'something',

Re: [Harbour] SIxDriver problem with sx_keyadd

On Thu, 28 Jan 2010, smu johnson wrote: Hi, I heard that Przemek is the guru to ask about SixCDX questions from Viktor. Well I think I have found a Clipper / Harbour incongruency. (or maybe I'm going about it the wrong way)... :). In the case below, whenever I use 3 args for SX_KEYADD, and

Re: [Harbour] -z switch seems to be overly anti-lazy

On Thu, 28 Jan 2010, smu johnson wrote: Hi! I noticed the -z switch allows to stop using shortcuts for .and. and .or. Clipper conditions. Without -z, if I do: eval(something) .or. .t. // will recognize that it's already true, and not make the eval When -z is enabled: .f. .and.

Re: [Harbour] SIxDriver problem with sx_keyadd

Hi Przemysław, I appreciate the answer. I don't like hacks either, as I have found some other hacks that I've had to try to work around. I wrote the EMPTY thing (as we do use the .ch file) and it solved the problem! So thanks for that. As far as the question of if you want to implement SIX3

Re: [Harbour] SIxDriver problem with sx_keyadd

Hi Przemek, On 2010 Jan 28, at 11:32, Przemysław Czerpak wrote: INDEX ON SXCHAR(10) TAG MIKEY OF TEMP EMPTY or is you do not use hbsix.ch: INDEX ON SXCHAR(10) TAG MIKEY TO TEMP CUSTOM otherwise above RTE is generated. 1052 is CL53 DBFCDX compatible error when user tries to execute key

Re: [Harbour] SIxDriver problem with sx_keyadd

On Thu, 28 Jan 2010, Szak�ts Viktor wrote: Hi Viktor, INDEX ON SXCHAR(10) TAG MIKEY OF TEMP EMPTY or is you do not use hbsix.ch: INDEX ON SXCHAR(10) TAG MIKEY TO TEMP CUSTOM otherwise above RTE is generated. 1052 is CL53 DBFCDX compatible error when user tries to execute key add or

Re: [Harbour] -z switch seems to be overly anti-lazy

Thanks for the reply. As far as I can tell, I have found a difference in Clipper and Harbour in terms of these evaluations. But as I said earlier, I could be completely mistaken. I have done a lot of little tests to check the -z flag but unfortunately I'm not that good at Clipper as one of my

Re: [Harbour] SIxDriver problem with sx_keyadd

Thank you Przemek. When it is done, could you please post in this thread? I suppose then, I would have to figure out how to get this incorporated with the 2.0.0 version of Harbour I am using now on Windows. *many thanks* 2010/1/28 Przemysław Czerpak dru...@acn.waw.pl On Thu, 28 Jan 2010,

RE: [Harbour] SIxDriver problem with sx_keyadd

Hello Przemek, INDEX ON SXCHAR(10) TAG MIKEY OF TEMP EMPTY or is you do not use hbsix.ch: INDEX ON SXCHAR(10) TAG MIKEY TO TEMP CUSTOM otherwise above RTE is generated. 1052 is CL53 DBFCDX compatible error when user tries to execute key add or del operation on normal non custom index.

Re: [Harbour] -z switch seems to be overly anti-lazy

It looks like I'm going to have to wait till my boss wakes up. I can't for the life of me figure out how to make an .EXE from an .OBJ from Clipper. Why couldn't they just make this easy, like hbmk2? *huge anger at software makers*. Oh well. I will have to wait about 3 hours until my boss comes

Re: [Harbour] Harbour 2.0.0 stats after one month

Hi! Among 'compiler' projects, this rank translated to _5th_ position, which is simply great:   http://sourceforge.net/softwaremap/trove_list.php?stquery=sort=group_rankingsortdir=ascoffset=0form_cat=48 Today the Harbour occupies the 4th position. Congratulations to all participants

Re: [Harbour] Re: hbpqtui class

Pritpal Bedi wrote: Roberto Lopez wrote: I only say that could be more convenient to establish a first modest goal for a basic, compact, multi-platform GUI bundled with Harbour and working out of the box. I can gather that you have something to srat with this vision. Please come forward

Re: [Harbour] SIxDriver problem with sx_keyadd

On Thu, 28 Jan 2010, smu johnson wrote: Hi, I appreciate the answer. I don't like hacks either, as I have found some other hacks that I've had to try to work around. I wrote the EMPTY thing (as we do use the .ch file) and it solved the problem! So thanks for that. As far as the question

Re: [Harbour] Re: hbpqtui class

Hi Pritpal, On 2010 Jan 28, at 07:29, Pritpal Bedi wrote: Viktor Szakáts wrote: If this is the case, there is nothing wrong in asking these things specifically. I very often ask such question on the list (and not always, but sometimes I even get answers), and IMO this should be the

Re: [Harbour] SIxDriver problem with sx_keyadd

Wow, great answer. Maybe I should stop using SIX3 entirely. Any other Harbour compatible database formats you would recommend for the transition, to avoid all these bugs? Hopefully it isn't hard to convert SIX3 to whatever you suggest. If I can keep using a file-based database instead of

Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[13725] trunk/harbour

Very good! all feature set are present -The idea or select one or more project must be applied also to make process search in current is not selected more selected project in project selector on mail menu -Check all *.* seem me corrispondent -seem little the result area that must have more row

[Harbour] Re: Qt* - A Mission Statement

Alex You simply missed the context of this message. - enjoy hbIDEing... Pritpal Bedi _a_student_of_software_analysis__design_ -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Qt-A-Mission-Statement-tp4470506p4473964.html Sent from the

[Harbour] hbIDE[ 19 ] Select one or more project must be applied also to make process

-The idea or select one or more project must be applied also to make process - enjoy hbIDEing... Pritpal Bedi _a_student_of_software_analysis__design_ -- View this message in context:

[Harbour] Re: hbpqtui class

Viktor Szakáts wrote: You should definitely not neglect other things, since we should never forget the fun part and that we do Harbour because it gives us something. But it's fully up to you how to balance. If it starts to ruin other things, just stop. Never anybody called for a

Re: [Harbour] hbIDE[ 19 ] Select one or more project must be applied also to make process

If this was meant for me: hbmk2 project1.hbp project2.hbp hbmk2 doesn't handle project trees and project interdependencies at the moment, so that part needs to be sorted out by caller application and a list of projects in proper sequence fed to hbmk2 (like above). If someone passed me an

[Harbour] Re: hbpqtui class

Viktor Szakáts wrote: I understand that, but .xml is just the container format, what really matters is the content and the specification which describes this content. In this case the content of the .ui file is seemingly a QT specific implementation of UI element description, with

[Harbour] Re: hbIDE[ 19 ] Select one or more project must be applied also to make process

If this was meant for me: hbmk2 project1.hbp project2.hbp /quote? This is Massimo's idea I jotted down here in this thread. His request is for hbIDE. As far as I remember hbMK2 already builds multiple projects - without cirricular dependancies, right ? - enjoy

[Harbour] Re: SIxDriver problem with sx_keyadd

Hi Thank you!!! By the way, you really know your stuff about Clipper! He knows almost everything about anything. - enjoy hbIDEing... Pritpal Bedi _a_student_of_software_analysis__design_ -- View this message in context:

Re: [Harbour] Re: hbpqtui class

So, the clean solution here is either to create a HBXBP specific file format, which implements a portable way of describing UI elements, OR (and this is definitely the easiest) to implement such class in HBQT. Ok, I do it. What be the name : hbqt_qtuiloader.prg ? Thank you. It's

Re: [Harbour] Re: hbIDE[ 19 ] Select one or more project must be applied also to make process

If this was meant for me: hbmk2 project1.hbp project2.hbp /quote? This is Massimo's idea I jotted down here in this thread. His request is for hbIDE. As far as I remember hbMK2 already builds multiple projects - without cirricular dependancies, right ? Yes, it can build a flat list

[Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[13728] trunk/harbour

Revision: 13728 http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=13728view=rev Author: vszakats Date: 2010-01-28 19:21:03 + (Thu, 28 Jan 2010) Log Message: --- 2010-01-28 20:20 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu) * utils/hbmk2/hbmk2.prg

Re: [Harbour] Re: hbpqtui class

I remember to implement WAPI_WAITFOR*() functions in hbwin after reading this conversation to help the matter, though we would need some portable core solution for this problem, also. I mensioned that I made some experiments, though not for a longer duration, and could not achieve

[Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[13729] trunk/harbour

Revision: 13729 http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=13729view=rev Author: druzus Date: 2010-01-28 22:25:09 + (Thu, 28 Jan 2010) Log Message: --- 2010-01-28 23:24 UTC+0100 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl) *

Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[13715] trunk/harbour

Hi Przemek, Sorry to resend, maybe you missed it. Your opinion on this? Brgds, Viktor On 2010 Jan 26, at 15:30, Viktor Szakáts wrote: Thanks a lot. Is there anything against using the BEGIN/END method in all cases? (xhb and non-xhb) If there isn't, it'd simplify logic. Brgds, Viktor

Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[13715] trunk/harbour

On Thu, 28 Jan 2010, Szak�ts Viktor wrote: Hi, Sorry to resend, maybe you missed it. Your opinion on this? Ups, number of messages in last days I should read carefully is still growing up and I have limited time :-( If you think it will make things simpler and easier to update then please

[Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[13730] trunk/harbour

Revision: 13730 http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=13730view=rev Author: vszakats Date: 2010-01-28 23:35:32 + (Thu, 28 Jan 2010) Log Message: --- 2010-01-29 00:34 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu) * utils/hbmk2/hbmk2.prg

Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[13715] trunk/harbour

Hi, On 2010 Jan 28, at 23:41, Przemysław Czerpak wrote: On Thu, 28 Jan 2010, Szak�ts Viktor wrote: Hi, Sorry to resend, maybe you missed it. Your opinion on this? Ups, number of messages in last days I should read carefully is still growing up and I have limited time :-( If you think

[Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[13731] trunk/harbour

Revision: 13731 http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=13731view=rev Author: vouchcac Date: 2010-01-29 02:07:36 + (Fri, 29 Jan 2010) Log Message: --- 2010-01-28 18:03 UTC-0800 Pritpal Bedi (prit...@vouchcac.com) * contrib/hbqt/filelist.mk

[Harbour] FM Stats - A puzzle I am unable to resolve

Hi Below is the part of hb_out.log : Application Memory Allocation Report - E:\harbour\contrib\hbide\hbide.exe Terminated at: 2010.01.28 18:32:33 Total memory allocated: 2765455 bytes (36580 block(s)) Warning, memory allocated but not released: 11662 bytes (499 block(s)) Block 1 0x10f7968

[Harbour-users] Telepathy TP_ONTIME / function calling timer alternate implementations?

Hi, Has anyone found a replacement for Telepathy TP_ONTIME? (it just allows you to execute any function you want during any millisecond intervals. Unfortunately, the hbtpathy library has left this TP_ONTIME function out... I e-mailed the author of the Harbour contrib lib, but perhaps he never

[Harbour-users] Q: Where can I find the harbour debugger?

Hi, I keep googling for Harbour Debugger, and get a bunch of results, yet no hints as to how to use this thing. From what I have read, I assume it exists... but where? Thanks -- smu johnson smujohn...@gmail.com ___ Harbour-users mailing list

Re: [Harbour-users] Q: Where can I find the harbour debugger?

smu johnson ha scritto: Hi, I keep googling for Harbour Debugger, and get a bunch of results, yet no hints as to how to use this thing. From what I have read, I assume it exists... but where? Thanks Just link hbdebug.lib, compile with flag -b (includes debug information) and activate it

RE: [Harbour-users] Telepathy TP_ONTIME / function calling timer alternate implementations?

Hi everyone, Her is the code I use : function delay (secs) local i i = seconds () + secs while (seconds () i) hb_idlestate () end return (nil) - CPU usage : 0 to 2 % - secs : number of seconds to wait. You can also specify 0.1 for 100 milliseconds -

Re: [Harbour-users] Telepathy TP_ONTIME / function calling timer alternate implementations?

On Thu, 28 Jan 2010, smu johnson wrote: Hi, Alright, I have no freaking clue how to do this properly. I have found that HB_IDLEADD() will keep calling the function() you specify while it's idle. Problem is, I need it called by millisecond lengths. This becomes a problem because I don't