Przemek,
Are we ready to do another beta release?
Thanks.
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Phil Barnett wrote:
> Are we ready to do another beta release?
I think so. And probably it should be called rc-1.
The open question is what to do with beta branch.
After Viktor's cleanup in devel code (mostly in
contrib) the diff file between branches has over
10MB. I can sync
On Thursday 24 January 2008 09:46:06 pm Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote:
> I think so. And probably it should be called rc-1.
> The open question is what to do with beta branch.
> After Viktor's cleanup in devel code (mostly in
> contrib) the diff file between branches has over
> 10MB. I can sync it but
On Friday 25 January 2008 02:07:16 am Phil Barnett wrote:
> On Thursday 24 January 2008 09:46:06 pm Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote:
> > I think so. And probably it should be called rc-1.
> > The open question is what to do with beta branch.
> > After Viktor's cleanup in devel code (mostly in
> > contrib)
On Jan 25, 2008 8:18 AM, Phil Barnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Release Candidate means we are freezing the code until the release of 1.0. No
> new code. Period.
Does this apply to contribs too?
best regards,
Lorenzo
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour
On Friday 25 January 2008 02:26:36 am Lorenzo Fiorini wrote:
> On Jan 25, 2008 8:18 AM, Phil Barnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Release Candidate means we are freezing the code until the release of
> > 1.0. No new code. Period.
>
> Does this apply to contribs too?
Yes. We need to have stabilit
Hi all,
I'm trying to minimize confusion and variations
when it comes to make files, and adding make_gnu.cmd
doesn't really help in that process (since we
already have the same filename with .bat extension,
and for most ppl - who are Windows users - .cmd seems
to be a possible (but in our case, n
Hi Przemek and all,
One important issue came to my mind, namely the
renaming of Harbour core libraries, to have the
"hb" prefix on them, as we've planned and already
agreed on not long ago.
I can do this on the weekend, but since this
would be a move which would definitely stir up
users, since a
On Friday 25 January 2008 02:52:26 am Szakáts Viktor wrote:
> Shall I do this renaming now?
Yes.
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Szakáts Viktor wrote:
> I'm trying to minimize confusion and variations
> when it comes to make files, and adding make_gnu.cmd
> doesn't really help in that process (since we
> already have the same filename with .bat extension,
> and for most ppl - who are Windows users - .cmd
Viktor,
.cmd files are enhanced .bat files on OS/2 as well as on Win32 from NT on.
On OS/2 if you launch a .bat file you open a DOS emulation box which cannot
execute OS/2 executables (with a few exceptions, which are those .EXEs which
have bundled inside them a DOS .EXE), so the .cmd variant of
So, if .bat works in OS/2 (which I believe they do, but
I may be wrong), I'd suggest not to add a copy of that
file with the .cmd extension (and different HB_* defaults
set). If it works OS/2 users will have to set those three
envvars and lauch the .bat file. Same goes for bin/bld.bat.
AFAIK it
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Szakáts Viktor wrote:
> Hi Przemek and all,
> One important issue came to my mind, namely the
> renaming of Harbour core libraries, to have the
> "hb" prefix on them, as we've planned and already
> agreed on not long ago.
> I can do this on the weekend, but since this
> would b
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Szakáts Viktor wrote:
> >Maybe I missed sth but I understood that now he has to set all
> >envvars manually and call 'make' directly.
> Yes, that's basically it. There is not much magic done
> in these batch files (platform envvars, HB_BIN/INC/LIB_INSTALL
> envvars set and make
Hi Przemek,
Okey, here's my TODO list for rename, let's revise it.
Current Proposed
LIBNAME LIBNAME
--- -
codepagehbcp
common hbcommon
compilerhbcomp ! -> hbc
debug hbdebug
hbsix hbsix
hsx hbhsx
langhblang
macro hbmacro
p
Proposal updated for rdds:
Current Proposed
LIBNAME LIBNAME
--- -
dbfcdx hbrddcdx ! -> rddcdx
dbffpt hbrddfpt ! -> rddfpt
dbfntx hbrddntx ! -> rddntx
Since we're breaking the hb* rule for 'gt's,
I think it's logical to do the same for 'rdd's
where the
On Friday 25 January 2008 09:49:31 am Mindaugas Kavaliauskas wrote:
> Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote:
> > I think so. And probably it should be called rc-1.
> > The open question is what to do with beta branch.
> > After Viktor's cleanup in devel code (mostly in
> > contrib) the diff file between branche
Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote:
I think so. And probably it should be called rc-1.
The open question is what to do with beta branch.
After Viktor's cleanup in devel code (mostly in
contrib) the diff file between branches has over
10MB. I can sync it but probably it will be much
easier to remove old bet
18 matches
Mail list logo
