Re: [Hardhats-members] Re: GTM Perl

2005-08-20 Thread Ruben Safir
On Sat, 2005-08-20 at 01:56, Mark Street wrote: You guys are cracking me up I can tell Ruben is from New Yawk by the passion of his posts it comes through hmmm http://www.nytimes.com/2002/05/26/nyregion/26WTC.html?ei=5070en=5cfced2aa8e0e870ex=1124683200pagewanted=print

[Hardhats-members] Rules for the List

2005-08-20 Thread Greg Kreis
We have quantified rules for the list that members are to observe in order to keep this list a productive and orderly place to explore and learn about the technical aspects of VistA (i.e. the infrastructure). Please review them. http://www.hardhats.org/mailing_list.html#RULES -- Greg Kreis

Re: [Hardhats-members] Lab Orders using CPRS

2005-08-20 Thread Madhavi Bagepalli
Yes Nancy. As Llyod had mentioned, I created a ONE TIME entry in the file 51.1 and the Package Prefix Field Value set to LR for this entry. And it worked. Madhavi From: Nancy Anthracite [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net To:

Re: [Hardhats-members] Re: GTM Perl

2005-08-20 Thread Kevin Toppenberg
Ruben, See I knew you were capable of a rational post. This one was a great example of being passionate while not assultive. :-) I guess I wasn't paying close enough attention. I had thought that the tenor of this thread was that Perl was a great language -- though not for the faint at heart.

Re: [Hardhats-members] Rules for the List

2005-08-20 Thread Kevin Toppenberg
I tried the link above twice, and got a bad link error. But I'm sure it says something like, stay on track and no flame wars. The shoe fits me, so I'll try to wear it. Kevin On 8/20/05, Greg Kreis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We have quantified rules for the list that members are to observe in

RE: [Hardhats-members] Rules for the List

2005-08-20 Thread Thurman Pedigo
I checked - short, succinct, and useful. I wouldn't mind seeing it posted to this list monthly. thurman I tried the link above twice, and got a bad link error. Kevin On 8/20/05, Greg Kreis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We have quantified rules for the list that members are to observe in

Re: [Hardhats-members] Is $$GTF~%ZISH() binary friendly?

2005-08-20 Thread Kevin Toppenberg
OK. Thanks I think I will write a function that loads a binary stream, encodes it as text (probably ascii chars representing hex numbers... A3,F1 etc.) This will only be 50% effecient (2 characters to represent 0-255). But the advantage is that I can store it in a WP field. And the RPCBroker

Re: [Hardhats-members] MUMPS features

2005-08-20 Thread smcphelan
For this esoteric message, is left-to-right really easier for all people, e.g., Israelis or anyone else who native language is to read right to left? M was developed in the US so it is natural that that language adopted a Western perspective. - Original Message - From: Holloway, Thomas

Re: [Hardhats-members] Lab Orders using CPRS

2005-08-20 Thread smcphelan
What is the difference between the ONE TIME you entered into the file and the ONCE entry that already existed? - Original Message - From: Madhavi Bagepalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2005 10:14 AM Subject: Re:

Re: [Hardhats-members] MUMPS features

2005-08-20 Thread Doctor Bones
Heh... ok... I know that I am not a MUMPS guru.. or even n00b but I have written both compilers and interpreters in the dim dim dim dim dim dim recesses of time... And I can't help but think, that it isn't the best thought out feature (reads mistake) of the language. I think that

Re: [Hardhats-members] Is $$GTF~%ZISH() binary friendly?

2005-08-20 Thread Maury Pepper
That sounds extremely slow. I would have guessed about 1/10th that time. - Original Message - From: Kevin Toppenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2005 11:37 PM Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Is $$GTF~%ZISH() binary friendly?

Re: [Hardhats-members] Is $$GTF~%ZISH() binary friendly?

2005-08-20 Thread Kevin Toppenberg
Let me send you the code. Perhaps you could suggest a more effecient approach. I'm not sure which parts of M are slower than others. It seemed slow to me as I waited 97 seconds for the file to load Kevin On 8/21/05, Maury Pepper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That sounds extremely slow. I

Re: [Hardhats-members] Is $$GTF~%ZISH() binary friendly?

2005-08-20 Thread Chris Richardson
Kevin, send me the code also and we will see what can be done. Your solution may be to convert the file from binary to hex before sending the resultant file to MUMPS or Cache. Bit manipulation is not their strength, but as you have shown, it is possible to do it with MUMPS. Best wishes;