I have not been able to find any module relating to
Opthalmology. Is there no such module in VistA?
Regards
Anna
More good press for the VA and VistA. ;-)
HEY VA! HAVE YOU HEARD?
From the Jan. 20, 2006 Washington (DC) Post, VA Care Is Rated Superior
to That in Private Hospitals -- The Department of Veterans Affairs
medical system once epitomized poor-quality care. But after a series of
changes, the system
Is there a 'base' pre-populated medication file available somewhere? Also, is there a similar issue with the drug interaction functionality (e.g. do drug interactions have to be specified one-by-one)?
Thanks,
Marc
My understanding is that the drug interaction system is based on
ingredients. Each drug has a link to its composite ingredients. As
new drug-drug interactions become known, these are added to the
database, but older drugs wouldn't have to be specifically linked,
because the check is based on the
Yes, like how would I link this into my system? My database has
PATIENT/IHS, so I assume that the system is alread there. But when I
do a ^DIC lookup, I still miss the duplicates.
Kevin
On 1/22/06, James Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
^AUNPLK is the IHS version of the file 2 lookup routine.
i put in disable the windows firewall, the rpc broker agent it's started and
when ia use RPCBroker tester this error, so i don't know what to do please
help
error during connection
error encountered
function was: recv
error was: wsaeintr_
my devices
Select DEVICE NAME: CONSOLE
1
OK, so this is not a CPRS problem, but a RPC connection problem.
Can you do a search of the archives for discussion of the NULL device?
I think you are only supposed to have 1 null device. And it is
supposed to be set a specific way--but I can't remember the details.
Kevin
On 1/23/06, Carlos
todo jala bien ya muchas gracias Kevin
everything it's ok thanks a lot Kevin
_
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
If you have a NEW GTM installation, I have an orderable item file and a drug
file and an insurance file courtesy of the HUI project that might work for
you. I have not thoroughly checked it out but it seems to be OK. It might
work in Cache as well, I am not sure. , but I don't see any reason
Somebody else on the list may know more about this than I do. As I
understand it when you use
DO ^DIC
to attempt to add a new patient it will do checking for dupes. I am not
sure if it will behave differently depending on whether DIC(0)[A or not.
There is also some special code in RPMS that
Here is the interactive dialogue you can get out of a system that uses DO
^AUPNLK as the lookup routine.
Select PATIENT NAME: BEER,SHIRLEY S
ARE YOU ADDING 'BEER,SHIRLEY S' AS A NEW PATIENT (THE 51ST)? No// Y
(Yes)
Enter complete middle name if known or press return to add as entered: :
I have explained how to populate the drug
files many times on this thread. I have even provided routines which will
simply this process. So why are we still talking about this problem?
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc Krawitz
Sent: Monday,
I recommend that the new data be posted to a scratch file rather than
directly to the Patient file, then run the duplicate checking code in
Toolkit, add the ones that are truly new, map the ones that are clearly
duplicates and flag the rest for human intervention.
-Original Message-
From:
--- Norman Dodd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have explained how to populate the drug files many times on this
thread.
I have even provided routines which will simply this process. So
why are
we still talking about this problem?
Could your tool be included as an option in the menu system?
De nada, Carlos. :-)
Kevin
On 1/23/06, Nancy Anthracite [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Carlos, show us your null device, please. Did you make the other changes I
sent you off the list when my email was rejected as spam?
On Monday 23 January 2006 11:33, Carlos sosa sosa wrote:
i put in disable
On 1/23/06, Cameron Schlehuber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recommend that the new data be posted to a scratch file rather than
directly to the Patient file, then run the duplicate checking code in
Toolkit,
Can you tell me again about this? What toolkit? Do you know the menu
option name?
Select the User Manual at http://www.va.gov/vdl/Infrastructure.asp?appID=12
and then go to the section on Duplicate Resolution Utilities. I don't know
if the APIs can be made to work across different files, but I know you're a
pretty creative guy!
Cameron
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Norman,
I need to go back and look at those posts, but as I recall, it was
along the lines of a method from extracting drugs from database A and
putting it into our database B. And for someone like myself, going
back and reinstalling a secondary copy of a database in order to get
the files out
The Posts were for getting a database for the drug files, exporting them,
importing them in your system, and then running routines that would populate
the other important files.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin
Toppenberg
Sent:
Jim,
Sorry it has taken a bit to get back to you. The lines look that way
because of the difference between unix vs. dos CR LF etc.
I am reattaching another copy which I ran unix2dos on.
I just took the configuration file that was on my system, and added my
changes. Do a text search in the
As far as I can tell, VistA doesn't seem to associate orders, lab tests, etc. with a patient problem(s). Why is that? I'm not a physician, so my preconceptions about workflow are probably wrong - hence my question. Do most EMRs function in this manner?
Thanks,
Marc
On Sat, 2006-01-21 at 13:54 -0600, Marc Krawitz wrote:
Kevin, one of things I'm researching is scripting gtm commands. In
[KSB] Marc, standard shell scripting works, e.g.:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ mumps -dir XYZ
w Hello, world
h
XYZ
GTM
Hello, world
GTM
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
-- Bhaskar
Look at ASTM E-1384 on the Structure and Content of the EHR. We are still
mapping the VistA/IHS models to these standards ( which can also be
mapped to the messaging standards). It will be of interest to see how
CCHIT uses these standards in pilot certification.
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006, Marc
Although I wouldn't associate them with a problem, it might be
appropriate to associate them with a diagnosis. I.e. you get a chest
XRay because of cough.
But it is easy for non-physicians to get carried away (IMHO) with data
gathering, and want this attached to that, anf for this or that button
The problem that I usually have comes later on in the process when all you want
out
of the mass of data is one particular lab result (just one number in most
cases or a brief trend) or one particular image from an MRI/CT or other larger
data set,
which could relate to the clinical problem at
25 matches
Mail list logo
