Second,
Regarding a previous question, somebody pointed me toward:
news://news.intersystems.com/intersystems.public.cache ... not having a
news reader handy, I was fortunate to look for, and find:
http://groups.google.com/group/intersystems-public-cache
I like Google Groups, it's 'slick'.
Looks
For what it's worth, I agree with a move to Google.
On 7/5/06, K.S. Bhaskar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dan --
>
> I don't think bandwidth is the issue.
>
> Although my primary interface to the list is via a mail client, I do
> value the ability to have browser based access when I am traveling, a
Dan --
I don't think bandwidth is the issue.
Although my primary interface to the list is via a mail client, I do
value the ability to have browser based access when I am traveling, and
Googlegroups gives both types of access.
Increasingly, I think the ability to search posts for relevant mate
Well, my opinion is that the whole process should be controlled by
HardHats. This email group isn't demanding in terms of bandwidth. I'd
install a listserver program on a server controlled by HardHats and be done
with it.
Since the majority want to stay with a mailing list format there should
It would seem it is time, some would say past time, to move our list to
a more reliable server. Several requests in the past for us to consider
a forum style list have met with resistance, so I bow to the will of the
most vocal... ;-)
It appears Googlegroups will keep the single list format a
