I think TP's are built by CWT.
Have the W0117RU here, happy so far!
FORC5 wrote:
Anyone know who builds Thermaltake PSU's ?
Been looking for awhile now and a TT Toughpower 750 has caught my eye, only one
I've seen that actually lists CFM of the 140mm fan. looking for 750watts, 120
or better
I'd not expect stellar from that card give how old vs. UT3.
RAM drive for TEMP likely counter-productive.
If you upgrade, skip Sapphire next time!
Winterlight wrote:
I just started playing UT3. I am trying to get my video to be more
responsive. I am running a dual Xeon 3.06, 4GB DDR400, and a
Nope, if it's old, it won't do better than that. I originally had a
7800GT (Nvidia) in my system and upgraded to an 8800GT to get decent
response. Note that UT3 is normally frame locked at 60fps (which
makes me laugh at some of the reviews on the web), so unless you
specifically go in and change
At 06:09 AM 8/4/2008, you wrote:
I'd not expect stellar from that card give how old vs. UT3.
Actually, I found a article on how to tweak your ATI card for UT3 or
any other game,
http://www.tweakguides.com/UT3_2.html
mostly explaining what the settings do, ...and after tweaking my
card it
At 07:06 AM 8/4/2008, you wrote:
he 7800GT did 20 to 30 fps, the 8800GT jumped that to 40-60 making it
'playable', however you will get frustrated with the game as they did
not correct the problems with UT2004 and added some new ones.
Did you install the update. A lot of little things, that wer
On 4 Aug 2008, at 19:47, Winterlight wrote:
RAM drive for TEMP likely counter-productive.
running from RAM rather then a hard drive counter productive... why?
Because dedicating a chunk like that You're blocking ram that could be
used for caching on an as-need basis.
Infact, it wouldn
Winterlight wrote:
At 06:09 AM 8/4/2008, you wrote:
I'd not expect stellar from that card give how old vs. UT3.
Actually, I found a article on how to tweak your ATI card for UT3 or any
other game,
http://www.tweakguides.com/UT3_2.html
mostly explaining what the settings do, ...and after
At 12:05 PM 8/4/2008, you wrote:
On 4 Aug 2008, at 19:47, Winterlight wrote:
RAM drive for TEMP likely counter-productive.
running from RAM rather then a hard drive counter productive... why?
Because dedicating a chunk like that You're blocking ram that could be
used for caching on an as-n
Winterlight wrote:
At 12:05 PM 8/4/2008, you wrote:
On 4 Aug 2008, at 19:47, Winterlight wrote:
RAM drive for TEMP likely counter-productive.
running from RAM rather then a hard drive counter productive... why?
Because dedicating a chunk like that You're blocking ram that could be
used
Not true, I have no such folder since I long ago moved pagefile,
%temp% for system & users, %userprofile%, and %programfiles% to
different volume from %windir%.
Yeah, well so did I, but Windows, ZoneAlarm, and VMware still put
log files and other files in \windows\temp
Have you set both the system & user temp environment variables? They are 2 separate
settings.
Winterlight wrote:
Not true, I have no such folder since I long ago moved pagefile,
%temp% for system & users, %userprofile%, and %programfiles% to
different volume from %windir%.
Yeah, well so di
At 02:37 PM 8/4/2008, you wrote:
Have you set both the system & user temp environment variables? They
are 2 separate settings.
yep both temp and tmp
Winterlight wrote:
Not true, I have no such folder since I long ago moved pagefile,
%temp% for system & users, %userprofile%, and %programfi
On Aug 4, 2008, at 5:37 PM, maccrawj wrote:
Have you set both the system & user temp environment variables? They
are 2 separate settings.
Not that surprising--a lot of programs are notorious for not using
GetSystemDir, GetTempDir and just assuming the locations are fixed.
Generally wind
IS raid 0 worth the effort in a desktop unit ? performance gain ? or is it
marginal with modern drives. ?
Home system, usual stuff including games.
Currently running 2 x 500gb WD. one is system other is full boot able backup (
with system guardian )
plan, 2 x 500 raid 0
backed up to a single 5
Hello FORC5,
Monday, August 4, 2008, 5:08:12 PM, you wrote:
> IS raid 0 worth the effort in a desktop unit ? performance gain ?
> or is it marginal with modern drives. ?
> Home system, usual stuff including games.
> Currently running 2 x 500gb WD. one is system other is full boot
> able backup
No I mean tmp & temp for both SYSTEM & USER, the are 2 sets of tmp & temp.
Winterlight wrote:
At 02:37 PM 8/4/2008, you wrote:
Have you set both the system & user temp environment variables? They
are 2 separate settings.
yep both temp and tmp
Winterlight wrote:
Not true, I have no such f
Plus, "when" one drive fails, you loose them both (at least the data...)
Rick Glazier
From: "Joe User" > IS raid 0 worth the effort in a desktop unit ?
Understand, why the backup with system guardian
fp
thanks
probably just play there for grins
At 06:40 PM 8/4/2008, Rick Glazier Poked the stick with:
>Plus, "when" one drive fails, you loose them both (at least the data...)
>
> Rick Glazier
>
>From: "Joe User" >
18 matches
Mail list logo
