Re: [H] Windows 7 RTM

2009-08-08 Thread Greg Sevart
In terms of the interface itself, or that you have to install the RSAT package to get the client? Interface wise, it doesn't bug me too much...though it is light on many fronts. I do hate that it is tied to RSAT, but at least it runs without having to drop in .NET DLLs and set environment variables

Re: [H] Windows 7 RTM

2009-08-08 Thread tmservo
HyperV server manager add on is still a stupid cludge. But so far, otherwise, very polished. Sent via BlackBerry -Original Message- From: "Greg Sevart" Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 23:00:27 To: Subject: Re: [H] Windows 7 RTM I just spent the better part of the afternoon and evening rebui

Re: [H] Windows 7 RTM

2009-08-08 Thread Greg Sevart
I just spent the better part of the afternoon and evening rebuilding my work machine to the RTM bits. (I was running the RC, and I don't believe in in-place upgrades, period). Sucks that I have to do it after hours, but it takes a good 5 hours or so to get critical tools and such reinstalled. It d

Re: [H] [Bulk] Re: Windows 7 RTM

2009-08-08 Thread swzaske
Sounds like the writing's on the wall for XP. Nice of MS to offer a family package with 3 licenses too. $50 a pop is very reasonable and I've always felt more people would buy instead of pirate if MS didn't charge so much. tmse...@rlrnews.com wrote: Bit faster for me. Hdmi audio support is im

Re: [H] Windows 7 RTM

2009-08-08 Thread tmservo
Bit faster for me. Hdmi audio support is improved over rc1. Codecs integrated correctly for mkv without registry help. Some new addons I haven't played with. No major changes I've seen. --Original Message-- From: swzaske Sender: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com To: hardware@hardwa

[H] Windows 7 RTM

2009-08-08 Thread swzaske
So what's the verdict so far? Any changes or improvements from RC1?