Re: [H] Motherboard upgrade gotcha

2006-02-24 Thread chuck
- Original Message - From: "Greg Sevart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "The Hardware List" Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 9:10 AM Subject: Re: [H] Motherboard upgrade gotcha Good thing all of my motherboard replacements are for defects. Defects in speed, defect

Re: [H] Motherboard upgrade gotcha

2006-02-24 Thread chuck
- Original Message - From: "Robert Turnbull" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 8:53 AM Subject: [H] Motherboard upgrade gotcha transferred from another computer. If the motherboard is upgraded or replaced for reasons other than a defect, the

RE: [H] Motherboard upgrade gotcha

2006-02-24 Thread Neil Davidson
> There have been moments where MS has denied what I thought > were reasonable re-up requests recently and I just said "yeah, OK". > > I agree with someone else: I would just tell them "I had bad > caps on that board" or "defect which caused incompatibility > with X" or whatever. > > They c

RE: [H] Motherboard upgrade gotcha

2006-02-24 Thread Chris Reeves
;s not the same as telling someone to buy it again ($130 or so) CW -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thane Sherrington (S) Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 10:47 AM To: The Hardware List Subject: RE: [H] Motherboard upgrade gotcha At 11:18 AM

RE: [H] Motherboard upgrade gotcha

2006-02-24 Thread Thane Sherrington (S)
At 11:18 AM 24/02/2006, Neil Davidson wrote: Seems fair to me. OEM software is priced lower than a retail copy because it has these conditions attached to it. If you don't want these licensing conditions, they you can buy a retail copy. Come on. This is clearly a money grab, justify it as they

Re: [H] Motherboard upgrade gotcha

2006-02-24 Thread warpmedia
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Turnbull Sent: 24 February 2006 13:53 To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com Subject: [H] Motherboard upgrade gotcha From the Lockergnome newsletter: Microsoft recently made changes to the license agreement. A

RE: [H] Motherboard upgrade gotcha

2006-02-24 Thread Neil Davidson
] On Behalf Of > Robert Turnbull > Sent: 24 February 2006 13:53 > To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com > Subject: [H] Motherboard upgrade gotcha > > From the Lockergnome newsletter: > > Microsoft recently made changes to the license agreement. A > new motherboard is now apparent

Re: [H] Motherboard upgrade gotcha

2006-02-24 Thread warpmedia
Given em time, soon it will be just replacing the CPU or RAM. "we're making more money than god, what else can we do to make more money?" Sounds more like a way to trip up someone dumb enough to say it was for a reason other than defect. Defect now seems to the back door to major changes then.

Re: [H] Motherboard upgrade gotcha

2006-02-24 Thread Greg Sevart
Good thing all of my motherboard replacements are for defects. Defects in speed, defects in feature list, defects in compatibility...:) FO MSFT. Greg - Original Message - From: "Robert Turnbull" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 7:53 AM Subject:

[H] Motherboard upgrade gotcha

2006-02-24 Thread Robert Turnbull
From the Lockergnome newsletter: Microsoft recently made changes to the license agreement. A new motherboard is now apparently the equal of a new computer, and if you upgrade it you need to purchase a new Windows license. Microsoft's new policy states: An upgrade of the motherboard is consider

Re: [H] Motherboard upgrade

2005-12-16 Thread Bill Cohane
At 22:30 12/15/05, FORC5 wrote: Do you think my Win2k will boot (and allow me to update other hardware) if I upgrade motherboards (PIII board to P4 board, both with Intel chipsets) but move the same SCSI card into the new motherboard? should not be a problem but w2k can be very anal sometimes

Re: [H] Motherboard upgrade

2005-12-15 Thread Wayne Johnson
At 10:25 PM 12/15/2005, Bill Cohane typed: Do you think my Win2k will boot (and allow me to update other hardware) if I upgrade motherboards (PIII board to P4 board, both with Intel chipsets) but move the same SCSI card into the new motherboard? Have done it several times with Win2k, Xp & once

RE: [H] Motherboard upgrade

2005-12-15 Thread Chris Reeves
ssage- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Cohane Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 9:25 PM To: The Hardware List Subject: Re: [H] Motherboard upgrade At 22:10 12/15/05, FORC5 wrote: >in device manager set hard drive to >standard dual channel pci ide contro

Re: [H] Motherboard upgrade

2005-12-15 Thread FORC5
should not be a problem but w2k can be very anal sometimes. fp At 08:25 PM 12/15/2005, Bill Cohane Poked the stick with: >At 22:10 12/15/05, FORC5 wrote: >>in device manager set hard drive to >>standard dual channel pci ide controller ( I am assuming not SATA ) >>I have a reg file to set boot bac

Re: [H] Motherboard upgrade

2005-12-15 Thread Bill Cohane
At 22:10 12/15/05, FORC5 wrote: in device manager set hard drive to standard dual channel pci ide controller ( I am assuming not SATA ) I have a reg file to set boot back to default settings. have yet to have a xp mb swap not boot. ( w2k yes but not xp ) should be on THG FTP luck the trick with

RE: [H] Motherboard upgrade

2005-12-15 Thread FORC5
why not ghost the boot partition to a fresh drive, redo the boot ini but may still require a repair install. This way at least the other drive is still intact. fp At 09:47 AM 12/15/2005, Mark Dodge Poked the stick with: >Well my XP install which I use most of the time is on a different partition

Re: [H] Motherboard upgrade

2005-12-15 Thread FORC5
in device manager set hard drive to standard dual channel pci ide controller ( I am assuming not SATA ) I have a reg file to set boot back to default settings. have yet to have a xp mb swap not boot. ( w2k yes but not xp ) should be on THG FTP luck the trick with the add on controller works to mo

RE: [H] Motherboard upgrade

2005-12-15 Thread Jason . Tozer
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 15 December 2005 16:47 To: 'The Hardware List' Subject: RE: [H] Motherboard upgrade Well my XP install which I use most of the time is on a different partition than the boot which is a buggered 2000 serv

RE: [H] Motherboard upgrade

2005-12-15 Thread Chris Reeves
rd Winning Anti-Spam Filter http://mail.giantcompany.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Dodge Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 10:47 AM To: 'The Hardware List' Subject: RE: [H] Motherboard upgrade Well my XP install which I

RE: [H] Motherboard upgrade

2005-12-15 Thread Mark Dodge
lf Of Greg Sevart Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 6:21 PM To: The Hardware List Subject: Re: [H] Motherboard upgrade Assuming it will boot completely at all. Even then, you can count on it not working very well until you do a proper format/reinstall. Why not just back up the boot volume and

Re: [H] Motherboard upgrade

2005-12-14 Thread Greg Sevart
ssage - From: "Mark Dodge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'The Hardware List'" Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 7:06 PM Subject: [H] Motherboard upgrade I am going to install an Epox 9NPA and a 3500 and I am making sure that there are not going to be any

[H] Motherboard upgrade

2005-12-14 Thread Mark Dodge
I am going to install an Epox 9NPA and a 3500 and I am making sure that there are not going to be any snafus. I have way to many gigs to try to back up and I am worried that XP will not start at all. I currently have a MSI Neo3 and going to Nforce4 it will not be quite the same. Should I expect XP