On 01-07-2005 17:56, Mark Wielaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
31 people actively contributed code to this release and made 389 CVS
commits during the last two months of development. diffstat since 0.15:
1248 files changed, 133649 insertions(+), 41802 deletions(-)
*sheesh*. Da's geen kattepis!
On 02-07-2005 12:53, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yo - guys - put a lid on it, and certainly keep language like that
off of this list, please.
Always remember, there's children reading along!
(last time I said that on a mailing list I was 14. Raised some eyebrows. I
think I was
I went to Harmony site [http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/svn.html]
I saw that the project code is on subversion. Also saw the command to
download the latest CVS code.
$ svn checkout https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/harmony
I downloaded only to find that there is no code in the
On Jul 5, 2005, at 7:04 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
IMHO the major issue is to put all the requirements for the
classpath on the paper, and then to see if the GNU classpath is
usable, and if not, can it be adopted to fulfill all the requirements.
That's not an unreasonable idea.
Thanks for
Hi,
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 21:40 +0530, Akhilesh Shirbhate wrote:
$ svn checkout https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/harmony
I downloaded only to find that there is no code in the repository and
there are only 54 files, most of which are site files in
./harmony/standard/site/
Hi,
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 08:51 -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
IMHO the major issue is to put all the requirements for the
classpath on the paper, and then to see if the GNU classpath is
usable, and if not, can it be adopted to fulfill all the requirements.
Patience my friend. It's
Hi,
On Mon, 2005-07-04 at 22:17 -0700, Weldon Washburn wrote:
Also, the following mail archive says that Apache has issues with CPL code:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/200503.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Does MMTK exist under any other license?
That seems to be
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Jul 5, 2005, at 7:04 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
IMHO the major issue is to put all the requirements for the
classpath on the paper, and then to see if the GNU classpath is
usable, and if not, can it be adopted to fulfill all the requirements.
That's not an
Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 2005-07-04 at 22:17 -0700, Weldon Washburn wrote:
Also, the following mail archive says that Apache has issues with CPL code:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/200503.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Does MMTK exist under any other license?
Mladen Turk wrote:
Right now the GNU classpath is GNU tools only. Trying to
compile that on WIN32 or WIN64 is very painful without
going trough some posix layer.
Do you mean using Cygwin and/or Mingw32? Or do you mean in general using
MSVC++ rather than gcc?
That is not very hard to
10 matches
Mail list logo
