http://freshmeat.net/projects/gnuclasspath/?branch_id=3525release_id=206114
So did these guys ditch?
As long as my app runs.
OT: Is there any way to run Java apps for Sony PSP? XBOX 360?
.V
On 9/7/05, Mark Wielaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It should. If not, please file a bug!
Most classpath/harmony sister projects will release an updated version
soon. For GCC/GCJ the release should be imported asap, the big merge
was one of the primary focuses of 0.18. GCC/GCJ should be much
Hi Robert,
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 13:19 +0100, Robert Lougher wrote:
It's odd you never mentioned JamVM's status in the list.
Sorry, certainly not deliberate. I do use jamvm all the time. And I was
pretty excited about the progress that Andreas made with jamvm on
darwin:
Mark Wielaard wrote:
[Snip]
Maybe
This week on harmony-dev can be extended to also cover some of the
other mailinglists of the sister projects.
Of course I could, the question is how to do this. First of all, we
should compile a list of mailing lists we consider to add to these
weekly reviews.
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 10:19:24PM +0200, Mail Delivery Subsystem wrote:
From: Dalibor Topic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Classpath .18 release
Mark Wielaard wrote:
OT: Is there any way to run Java apps for Sony PSP? XBOX 360?
There might be a
David == David Tanzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David * Kaffee:
David- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just one 'e': kaffe.
There's also the gcj lists:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom
Hi Dave,
Thanks for the suggestion. I will find out if I am allowed to look at
the sourceforge documentation. I looked on google for any open
literature describing the integration of MMTK and a C/C++ based VM.
As far as I can tell, the port to Rotor falls into this category. But
I can't look
Hi, folks,
Class unloading is an optimization Harmony wants to have, and it
should be straightforward to implement the class unloading semantics
proposed by Java Language Specification. We want to push this a bit
further to allow more VM data structures be reclaimed. We call them VM
objects
I totally agree with Xiao feng's proposal
Best Regards,
William Wu
Software Engineer
Sybase Shanghai RD Center
Room 1202-1206, Building One,
Zhangjiang Semiconductor Industry Park
3000 Longdong Avenue
Pudong, Shanghai 201203
Tel: 8621-68799918 ext 3081
Fax: 8621-68790199
Email: [EMAIL
Xiao-Feng Li wrote:
They are basically two approaches to unload the classes, one is to
encode the VM object similarly as App object with a header, then GC
can treat them uniformly (almost); the other approach treats class
unloading specially, which reclaims a class loader together with all
its
Archie, thanks for the info, the approach looks like the second one I
suggested. We can take it at first.
Btw, there are some situations I am not sure if the approach you
mentioned is possible. For example, we may want to reclaim also VM
structures for strings that is not associated with a class
11 matches
Mail list logo
