Pls. try the test case on HashMap below.
On RI, it print out:
null
null
On Harmony, it print out
null
value1
it is definitely bad practice to reuse a object as hash key by modify
its hashcode, but I DID see some similar cases before, after all, you
cannot force but only can *suggest*
Stefano,
I think we should take Geir's advice and pipe down a bit. Those whose task it
is to resolve this issue are by now pretty aware of the issues involved, and
our explanations to eachother serve only to increase entropy.
Meanwhile we may meditate on Jorge Luís Borges' story _Pierre
Hi Tim,
On 3/14/06, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree that they need to be reinstated Stepan, I'd just like to
separate out the suite of tests that are pure API tests (and therefore
expected to run on all compliant implementations, modulo their known
bugs/departures) and the
Hi George,
I'd like to fix outcome of this discussion. I think a JIRA issue should
filed to track tests reorg. As far as it'll be next massive reorg. and can
not be applied right now (there are other massive updates pending in JIRA).
And JIRA won't let us to forget about our decision.
Thanks,
Hello
We can discuss the problem in general and then apply the decision to
serialization framework.
So, can we have standard test templates
i.e. abstract classes with prepared test scenarios implemented as test methods
such that specific tests would extend a template (and thus inherit all
test
Hi Paulex,
IMHO from compatibility point of view any behavior is legal.
HashMap is mostly designed for keys that do not change over time, at least
spec silent about changing the keys. So, I think implementation specsific is
allowed here.
But I think that aiming stability we'd better compare
Hi, Mikhail,
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
Hi Paulex,
2006/3/14, Paulex Yang [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mikhail
I spent a little time on the framework, and I must say that this
framework is very easy to use. Impressive!
But I still have some thoughts on it:
1. Sometime assertEquals() is not enough for
Tim Ellison wrote:
That URL is a bit of a mouthful though, perhaps we need a redirect from
http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/updates ?
Personally I'd rather have a XML file to import in the Update dialogue
since it gives the correct values for both fields.
--
Thorbjørn
Hi Paulex,
2006/3/15, Paulex Yang [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi, Mikhail,
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
Hi Paulex,
2006/3/14, Paulex Yang [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mikhail
I spent a little time on the framework, and I must say that this
framework is very easy to use. Impressive!
But I still have
Hi, Mikhail,
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
Hi George!
I need to study H-57 SerializationTester, likely it makes sense taking
best ideas from both
I was trying to find out how the framework works and how a test
based on that framework looks like.
I've taken the first class refering to
Mikhail
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
Hi Paulex,
2006/3/15, Paulex Yang [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi, Mikhail,
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
Hi Paulex,
2006/3/14, Paulex Yang [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mikhail
I spent a little time on the framework, and I must say that this
framework is very easy to
Using serialization framework from security module,
the test would look like as follows:
public class CharacterCodingExceptionTest extends SerializationTest {
protected Object[] getData() {
return new Object[] { new CharacterCodingExceptionTest ()};
}
protected void
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 06:50:44PM -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Dalibor Topic wrote:
On a Harmony-unrelated side note, if you are interested in seeing your
port in the Kaffe.org CVS tree, and your contract allows for it, feel
free to send me the patch. :)
On a harmony-related
Hi Stepan,
Good idea. I will raise it today. It will only cover the proposed layout
of these test resources in a given module and not discuss how the
serialization tests are carried out since that discussion is still ongoing.
Best regards,
George
Stepan Mishura wrote:
Hi George,
I'd like
Paulex,
As we recently discussed, there is nothing in the spec that prevents us
from (re-)implementing the method in the subclass, even though it is not
specified to have any additional behavior to the inherited version. So
while the point of the issue may be wrong, I've applied the patch to
Why not describe it in a doc, and submit it for the website?
Regards,
Tim
George Harley wrote:
Hi Stepan,
Good idea. I will raise it today. It will only cover the proposed layout
of these test resources in a given module and not discuss how the
serialization tests are carried out since
Just for you Thorbjørn
Regards,
Tim
---
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
bookmarks
site name=Apache Harmony update site
url=http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/incubator/harmony/enhanced/tools/trunk/eclipse/org.apache.harmony.eclipse.site;
web=false
FYI: I noticed a few minor things that we should probably fix in this
contribution, but they don't break the build and it makes sense to
commit the contribution as we received it then fix it up in 'business as
usual' development.
Regards,
Tim
Tim Ellison (JIRA) wrote:
[
Will Sun's implementation ever find ReusableKey if the value has been
changed?
It would not surprise me if this simple case Sun doesn't find the entry,
because they do something like hashing the hash that ReusableKey
returns, or only allocating a prime number of buckets, e.g. you ask for
a
49 commit messages for a single commit! The continuous wash-in of
Really Big(tm) chunks of code scares me a little (even if its real cool)
-- usually I make it policy to read every single line of code contributed
to a project for which I'm on the PMC but there's no chance in hell I'm
going to
Isn't this the initial commit for somwthing we just voted in?
(me in car so can't see right now)
-Original Message-
From: Leo Simons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed Mar 15 11:34:35 2006
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject:Re: svn commit: r386058 [1/49]
Yes, the log message is only shown in the first commit message in the set.
That particular commit is the HARMONY-57 bulk contribution that was
voted on by the -dev list. The other big commit I did today is the
HARMONY-88 bulk contribution that was also accepted by the -dev list.
I'm not *that*
I assume that you noted the jura entry in the commit log.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ellison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed Mar 15 11:44:19 2006
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject:Re: svn commit: r386058 [1/49] ...
Yes, the log message is only shown
I did my usual trick, which is to mention the JIRA tag and the issue
summary; in this case it was:
In svn commit: r386087 [1/45] -...
snip
Log:
Commit contribution HARMONY-88 (Contribution of code and unit tests for
jndi, logging, prefs and sql plus unit tests only for beans, crypto,
math, regex
That's what I fgured. Me still in car.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ellison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed Mar 15 11:53:57 2006
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject:Re: svn commit: r386058 [1/49] ...
I did my usual trick, which is to mention the JIRA tag
Mark wrote:
Of course, it shouldn't be closed yet since quite a few of the
contributed test cases still need to be integrated.
Well I figured I'd mark it closed it since the code is now in SVN, even
if it is not fully integrated yet. I figured we could work on the final
aspects of integration
As well as the new classes, we have over 2700 tests that's nearly ten
times the number we were running a week ago. And there are a few more
that need some work. So if anyone is looking for something to do,
take a look at the excluded tests in the
modules/*/make/common/build.xml files.
I've been
No problem, I've reopened it.
Let's hope that HARMONY-39 gets committed soon then we can finish the
remainder.
Regards,
Tim
Mark Hindess wrote:
Not all the code is in svn. So I'd say leave it open to remind us
that there's still more work to do.
-Mark.
On 3/15/06, Tim Ellison [EMAIL
Mikhail,
I took a few shortcuts getting these integration done. I'm planning
to factor out the acquire depends jars step in to a separate ant file.
My current plan is to create a new make/depends.xml file that would
be responsible for fetching the files and have the make/build.xml use
that to
Dears,
If you select Spaces only as Eclipse tab policy and you format the
Harmony source code in Eclipse, when you creating patch for the source
code, Subclipse may regard the source code as total different with the
source in SVN. Then other developers cannot know what you have changed
to
30 matches
Mail list logo
