+1
On 09/05/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have received the ACQs and the BCC for Harmony-211 in paper form and
have reviewed them, so I can assert that the critical provenance
paperwork is in order. It is not in SVN yet, but I wanted to get this
vote going at the same time
Whether do I correctly understand it's supposed to modify the existent build
system? I mean the following.
Each of modules (or components) has the native (shared platform specific)
and Java parts.
As a rule these components will be built with similar way. If there is any
specific (compile
Good catch, Mark!
The test is incorrect, I'll fix it
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/5/10, Mark Hindess [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've seen two failures of the above test. The first when testing r405190
on Monday and the second when testing r405640 this morning. Message
was the same in both:
Nathan Beyer wrote:
Perhaps this is a bit of an aside, but one of the biggest difficulties I
have when trying to develop against a single module is the availability of
the test support classes. Currently, I run the ant build and run the
'compile-support' to build the test support classes. Then
I've seen two failures of the above test. The first when testing r405190
on Monday and the second when testing r405640 this morning. Message
was the same in both:
testSecureRandomFailure incorrect random bytes
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: incorrect random bytes at
+1
Regards,
- Vikram Mohan
On 5/9/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have received the ACQs and the BCC for Harmony-211 in paper form and
have reviewed them, so I can assert that the critical provenance
paperwork is in order. It is not in SVN yet, but I wanted to get this
vote
Mark Hindess wrote:
On 9 May 2006 at 10:32, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Hindess wrote:
As the Harmony Classlib grows, I think that being able to work on a
single module (or some subset of the modules) will become the
typical way of working for many (perhaps even most)
Nathan Beyer wrote:
Perhaps this is a bit of an aside, but one of the biggest difficulties I
have when trying to develop against a single module is the availability of
the test support classes. Currently, I run the ant build and run the
'compile-support' to build the test support classes. Then
Stepan Mishura (JIRA) wrote:
snip
2) To avoid casting while-loop was replaced with for-loop. Could you review
the change?
I was scratching my head about this cast, so I was very pleased to see
your elegant solution.
I must admit that I don't really understand why the for-loop version is
Hi,
Just a heads up to you all (and especially anyone working in beans just
now) that I would like to make some changes to src/tests in the beans
module in the next day or so. Proposed changes are similar to the tidy
ups that have taken place in archive, jndi, rmi, logging, prefs etc over
Hi,
I would like to start a little discussion around JIRA issue 436 [1]
which deals with exception throwing compatibility between Harmony and
the RI. I feel it is important to reach a concrete agreement on this as
so far all of the participants in the issue seem to disagree about the
Hello
I know that x86_64 is not supported at the moment (although VM does support
this mode in interpreter only way if ran with -Dvm.use_interpreter=true), so
I tried to do some porting at home where I run gentoo linux [1]. I didn't
succeed in running anything but moved somewhat in building
Just a random tip...
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 06:13:05AM +, Stepan Mishura (JIRA) wrote:
Fixed in LUNI module at repo revision 405648. Please check that the fix
resolved your issue.
Similarly to having eg HARMONY-454 in the commit logs instead of issue 454
so that
it is easier to
George
Is there any reason to make this changes now rather then complete discussion
around the tests layout?
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/5/11, George Harley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
Just a heads up to you all (and especially anyone working in beans just
now) that I would like to make some changes to
Does someone understand why this works this way? This seems so odd. I know
there are quirks to the generics syntax, but this in an edge I haven't run
into yet. I haven't been able to make this one click in my head yet.
This compiles fine:
public synchronized void putAll(Map? extends K,?
On 5/10/06, Tim Ellison wrote:
Stepan Mishura (JIRA) wrote:
snip
2) To avoid casting while-loop was replaced with for-loop. Could you
review the change?
I was scratching my head about this cast, so I was very pleased to see
your elegant solution.
I must admit that I don't really understand
If you are working on Windows and don't have a C development environment
setup the build fails right away. It might be useful to provide a
mechanism for obtaining the windows binary components so people who are
only interested in the java parts of harmony can build everything after
a
On 5/11/06, Leo Simons wrote:
Just a random tip...
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 06:13:05AM +, Stepan Mishura (JIRA) wrote:
Fixed in LUNI module at repo revision 405648. Please check that the fix
resolved your issue.
Similarly to having eg HARMONY-454 in the commit logs instead of issue
454 so
The existent snapshot is intended for this purpose. However I'm not 100%
sure it will help
for your case when the C development environment is absent. I mean the
default Windows installation
should contain some set of dynamic libaries the snapshot can loaded at
runtime.
Thanks,
Vladimir.
On
19 matches
Mail list logo
