On 5/15/06, Weldon Washburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FYI -- If you get connection timed out errors when trying to run
build.bat update..., it could be because http.proxyhost and
http.proxyPort are not set correctly.
Proxy settings can be set as follows:
build.bat
You mean it's hand-me-down-ware these days, you just get a copy from someone
who got it from someone else who paid 50 bucks a few years ago and wishes he
didn't? Amazing how many widely-used benchmarks fall into that category ...
On Monday 15 May 2006 22:51, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Neither,
Hi George, see below
2006/5/16, George Harley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Mikhail,
I have a couple of minor comments about your proposal for a test
layouts. I should have responded sooner, I know, but I have suffered
from a number of hardware problems in the past few weeks that slowed
things down
Tim Ellison wrote:
That layout works for me too.
Patches welcome ;-)
hehe, had a feeling that might be coming ;)
Im actually working on a couple of preliminary patches at the moment for
this refactoring. One is a minor tidy up, raised in HARMONY-451. I hope
to raise another JIRA soon
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
Hi George, see below
2006/5/16, George Harley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Mikhail,
I have a couple of minor comments about your proposal for a test
layouts. I should have responded sooner, I know, but I have suffered
from a number of hardware problems in the past few weeks
2006/5/16, George Harley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
Hi George, see below
2006/5/16, George Harley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Mikhail,
I have a couple of minor comments about your proposal for a test
layouts. I should have responded sooner, I know, but I have suffered
from a
My personal opinion is we need to improve the existent build system for
DRLVM contribution.
I'd like to share my thoughts how it can be accomplished.
It's known there are two stages of build process:
- Downloading the sources for the third party tools (./build.sh
update);
- Compilation
Alexei,
Thanks you for your comments. They were very useful.
Fixes according to most comments are included into the new version.
Please, find the new version (0.2) and all previous versions here:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ManageAttachments.jspa?id=12340105
Some disputes:
The problem
This has broken because the subant target picks up any directory
matching modules/* which has a make/build.xml in it. The modules/rmi2/
make/build.xml isn't integrated so it breaks the build.
Quick fix would be to rename:
modules/rmi2/make/build.xml
to:
modules/rmi2/make/build.orig.xml
Vladimir Gorr wrote:
My personal opinion is we need to improve the existent build system for
DRLVM contribution.
...
Therefore there are no needs to compile them each of participants. It'd be
fine to have these sources pre-compiled (another snapshot?)
The idea of having something precompiled
Mark Hindess wrote:
This has broken because the subant target picks up any directory
matching modules/* which has a make/build.xml in it. The modules/rmi2/
make/build.xml isn't integrated so it breaks the build.
Quick fix would be to rename:
modules/rmi2/make/build.xml
to:
I was at the J1 keynote this morning hoping to hear news about Sun
open-sourcing Java.
First, they announced some kind of distribution-like agreement with
Ubuntu, so that any Debian-based distro can easily install Java. It
wasn't clear if they really are going to distribute Ubuntu w/ Java or
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 10:46:55AM -0700, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
I was at the J1 keynote this morning hoping to hear news about Sun
open-sourcing Java.
First, they announced some kind of distribution-like agreement with
Ubuntu, so that any Debian-based distro can easily install Java. It
I give Sun credit for two things...
1. preventing polluting of the platform a la J++.
In a June 20, 1996, memo entitled windows internet issues Microsoft's
then-VP Paul Maritz
explainedhttp://www.courttv.com/archive/trials/microsoft/legaldocs/doj_suit.htmlthat
it was necessary for the firm to
Arghh. Thanks for bailing me out George -- I'd forgotten about that
subant business.
I'll seek out purveyors of sack cloth and ashes in the area :-(
Regards,
Tim
George Harley wrote:
Mark Hindess wrote:
This has broken because the subant target picks up any directory
matching modules/*
Dalibor Topic wrote:
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 10:46:55AM -0700, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
I was at the J1 keynote this morning hoping to hear news about Sun
open-sourcing Java.
First, they announced some kind of distribution-like agreement with
Ubuntu, so that any Debian-based distro can
As a PhD student looking for open-source infrastructure, it's
exciting to see how much progress is being made in the Harmony project!
That said, I've run into some strange behavior trying to run the
DRLVM on my machine (x86 running Fedora Core 1). The VM itself seems
to build fine, but I
If you are coming, we're upstairs. Call my cell +1 203 665 6437 to find us
-
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
Hi Naveen,
On 5/17/06, Naveen Neelakantam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a PhD student looking for open-source infrastructure, it's
exciting to see how much progress is being made in the Harmony project!
That said, I've run into some strange behavior trying to run the
DRLVM on my machine (x86
On 5/16/06, Salikh Zakirov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vladimir Gorr wrote:
My personal opinion is we need to improve the existent build system for
DRLVM contribution.
...
Therefore there are no needs to compile them each of participants. It'd
be
fine to have these sources pre-compiled
Hi Vladimir,
On May 16, 2006, at 10:19 PM, Vladimir Gorr wrote:
Hi Naveen,
On 5/17/06, Naveen Neelakantam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a PhD student looking for open-source infrastructure, it's
exciting to see how much progress is being made in the Harmony
project!
That said, I've run
21 matches
Mail list logo
