yap! you are right! :-D
AND that what I'm hopping too!
On 5/18/06, Salikh Zakirov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[offtopic]
http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/overview.html
It looks like the new web toolkit has the potential of substantially
increasing the popularity of Java for internet/intranet
I don't think they videoed the sideshows, but JavaOne have made the
slides that were submitted available on-line.
Go to
http://www.cplan.com/javaone2006/contentcatalog
search on keyword Harmony (and make note of the username and password
shown on that page).
The presentation is available as
Weldon,
I have prepared my modifications and posted a patch against the
SVN/classlibadapter.
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-483
I was able to get rid of all native modifications and some of modified classes.
NewWeakGlobalRef implementation on vm needed though.
More tests works
Ivan,
I just now looked at 483. Good work. I'd like to check-in these mods
into svn but don't have check-in permission.
I am in the process of trying to move to the current version of
Harmony Class Library. It will also soon need to be checked in. I
will send a mail on it shortly.
Weldon
All,
I am in the process of moving gnuclasspathadapter to a much new
version of Harmony Class Library. I did an svn update two days ago.
There is a problem in the early boot stage with the method class$
from the current version of java/lang/Character. I have looked at
We also agreed to put only internationalized messages and
to have a single catalog by module.
Is there any way to meet all the agreements without rewriting the
internationalization framework?
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/5/19, Magnusson, Geir [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
And if we didn't, I think we just did
Hi Mikhail
I didn't study details of net testing so I can not say for sure - I expect
that with some minor improvements the prototype can be used for most of
testing scenarios (I mean scenarios where a test opens connection and
optionally send/receive some message.)
Thanks,
Stepan.
On
Hi George,
On 5/19/06, George Harley wrote:
Stepan Mishura wrote:
[SNIP]
Hi Stepan,
Is your preference to separate out all remote server dependent tests
(that could be made work with a locally installed server) from the
normal test flow ?
Yes.
For instance, have them run in a separate
On 5/19/06, Tim Ellison wrote:
Stepan Mishura wrote:
snip
I'm OK only if we separate tests with Jetty from common test suite run.
Why?
Because each external dependency complicates 'normal' test suite run ( I
don't want to face with situation when to run Harmony test suite I have to
