George,
Totally agree with you.
Shall we summarize and document the discuss to Harmony exception-thrown
compatibility guideline?
Thanks!
On 6/30/06, George Harley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
For the example I've started this thread with it seems that complying
the spec
So, we should always follow RI?
Even when RI behavior is not consistent and contradicts the spec.?
Here is one example:
javax.crypto.EncryptedPrivateKeyInfo(algName, encryptedData) spec. states:
NoSuchAlgorithmException - if the specified algName is not supported.
For code:
new
correction:
RI throws NoSuchAlgorithmException for
new EncryptedPrivateKeyInfo(0, new byte[598]);
On 7/4/06, Boris Kuznetsov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, we should always follow RI?
Even when RI behavior is not consistent and contradicts the spec.?
Here is one example:
Nathan,
I have rolled back this commit (in r418963) because it was causing lots
of test failures on Linux and Windows.
Please can you take another look at it?
Regards,
Tim
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: ndbeyer
Date: Mon Jul 3 13:47:39 2006
New Revision: 418844
URL:
Hello Paulex,
I'm looking at the component status of java.util [1]. And I find you
have raised two JIRAs for java.util.EnumMap[2] and EnumSet[3], however,
there is no follow-on actions. ;-) Are you still working on these
classes? Thanks a lot.
1. http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/LUNI
2.
Oops...sorry for that, I had interest on them, but from then on, I've
been (desperately) busy on NIO stuffs :-(((. I've updated the Wiki page
and reverted the status of the two classes to Welcome Volunteer. Thank
you for the reminder! Anyone else want to help?
Richard Liang wrote:
Hello
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Can you get your IDE to invoke ant?
Of course, but do you really want our implementation code to be closely
coupled to Ant?
(please answer with a question, I'm getting into the Wimbledon spirit)
Regards,
Tim
Tim Ellison wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Indeed not.
Yuri,
Thanks for your contribution!
Before I can take your code into Harmony please can I ask you to
complete a contributors' questionnaire?
The Harmony contribution policy [1] requires that we have an Authorized
Contributor Questionnaire [2] on file. It should only take you a couple
of
Hi,
Just noticed that the source file java.util.regex.AbstractCharClass in
modules/regex contains the following Javadoc comment for the
PredefinedCharacterClasses inner class:
/**
* character classes generated from
* http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr18/
*
Richard Liang wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
Yep, if the spec tells you what the format of the string should be then
follow it (since apps may be dependent upon it), otherwise I'd be
inclined to invent your own useful string representation.
This
Boris Kuznetsov wrote:
So, we should always follow RI?
Even when RI behavior is not consistent and contradicts the spec.?
I never think it's a case of always. I think it's a case of always
discuss :)
geir
Here is one example:
javax.crypto.EncryptedPrivateKeyInfo(algName,
Tim Ellison wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Can you get your IDE to invoke ant?
Of course, but do you really want our implementation code to be closely
coupled to Ant?
RIght now it's coupled to a specific version number from eclipse-land
that requires the code itself to change when they
+1
That's fine. Go for it.
geir
George Harley wrote:
Hi,
Just noticed that the source file java.util.regex.AbstractCharClass in
modules/regex contains the following Javadoc comment for the
PredefinedCharacterClasses inner class:
/**
* character classes generated from
*
Actually, what about some kind of SPI? Or now that JSR-199 in in public
draft form, anything useful in there?
(There's two more questions 40-love)
geir
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Can you get your IDE to invoke ant?
Of course, but do you
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Actually, what about some kind of SPI? Or now that JSR-199 in in public
draft form, anything useful in there?
How would that help? We would still have to name the JAR that contains
those providers wouldn't we?
What do you think about simply adding all jars in jdk/lib
Hi all,
I have just raised HARMONY-744 which moves the vmi and luni native
code into the luni module, and the zip and zlib code into archive.
AFAICS, there is only one more set of moves to do before native
modularisation is complete (phew!).
With the last set of changes, I plan to move the
2006/7/3, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
All: support classes, impl-classpath, impl-boot, api-classpath, and
api-boot tests
are compiled into separate directories.
( TestNG looking better by the hour eh? ;-) )
Support classes are compiled first, tests are compiled
4) Change the drlvm build so that its deploy tree layout has no classlib
files in it. So we can do ...
As a first step, I suggest that we make drlvm build completely free
from the classlib-related tasks and files, this may help to avoid
further confusion. For example, it doesn't have to copy
Hi,
To support the idea mentioned in the letter
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-harmony-dev/200602.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED],
I've tried to implement the file I/O part of the Harmony portlib using APR.
The JIRA issue with the patch is
On 7/4/06, Marina Goldburt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
To support the idea mentioned in the letter
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-harmony-dev/200602.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED],
I've tried to implement the file I/O part of the Harmony portlib using APR.
The JIRA issue with
Garrett Rooney wrote:
Until a version of APR exists that doesn't require the use of memory
pools, this approach is simply not reasonable to take.
I pretty much agree with you.
The entire tomcat-native that makes a low level network
abstraction is very much slowed down by the fact that we
need
On 6/30/06, Alex Astapchuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, the simplest form of write barrier would be one, single
parameter -- a ref ptr to the object getting scribbled on. I suspect
Hmmm...
Seems I have a misunderstanding here - how comes a single ref ?
What I was thinking of, is
On 7/4/06, Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Garrett Rooney wrote:
Until a version of APR exists that doesn't require the use of memory
pools, this approach is simply not reasonable to take.
I pretty much agree with you.
The entire tomcat-native that makes a low level network
abstraction
Garrett Rooney wrote:
Anyway, now we're way off topic for this list ;-)
Right :)
--
Mladen.
-
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Garrett Rooney wrote:
On 7/4/06, Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Garrett Rooney wrote:
Until a version of APR exists that doesn't require the use of memory
pools, this approach is simply not reasonable to take.
I pretty much agree with you.
The entire tomcat-native that makes a low
Tim Ellison wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Actually, what about some kind of SPI? Or now that JSR-199 in in public
draft form, anything useful in there?
How would that help? We would still have to name the JAR that contains
those providers wouldn't we?
No - the tool would examine
Hello,
I've created an Eclipse automated test based on Salikh's code - please see
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-752
I've tested it on Windows XP on Eclipse that goes with harmony VM -
eclipse-SDK-3.1.1-win32.zip
Sometimes (irregularry) after execution it prints some stack
Andrey Chernyshev wrote:
4) Change the drlvm build so that its deploy tree layout has no classlib
files in it. So we can do ...
As a first step, I suggest that we make drlvm build completely free
from the classlib-related tasks and files, this may help to avoid
further confusion.
I
Hi Tim,
On 7/4/06, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrey Chernyshev wrote:
I'm not sure it is just a name clash problem - drlvm won't give the
hythread library if the class lib hadn't requested it.
The classlib builds it's own copy of the hythread library, so there is
no need for a
Marina Goldburt wrote:
Hi,
To support the idea mentioned in the letter
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-harmony-dev/200602.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED],
I've tried to implement the file I/O part of the Harmony portlib using
APR.
The JIRA issue with the patch is
Shouldn't we be using Unicode 4.0.1, since Java 5 RI is 4.0-based and 4.1 is
large upgrade? I've used 4.0.1 to implement some of the Character and
UnicodeBlock code since it's a 4.0 patch version.
Should be attempt to support a single Unicode version for all modules,
regardless of which version
On 7/4/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrey Chernyshev wrote:
4) Change the drlvm build so that its deploy tree layout has no classlib
files in it. So we can do ...
As a first step, I suggest that we make drlvm build completely free
from the classlib-related tasks and
I was trying to compile the kernel classes set from DRLVM independently
from the classlib and found it difficult because kernel classes set
currently have a dependence on the internal classlib API, e.g.
org.apache.harmony.luni.internal.net.www.protocol.jar.JarURLConnection
and
Nathan Beyer wrote:
Shouldn't we be using Unicode 4.0.1, since Java 5 RI is 4.0-based and 4.1 is
large upgrade? I've used 4.0.1 to implement some of the Character and
UnicodeBlock code since it's a 4.0 patch version.
Should be attempt to support a single Unicode version for all modules,
Sorry about that. I've applied a new fix that resolves this and my Windows
build/test is working. It seems that
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-403 was actually caused by the
changes made for http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-206.
-Original Message-
From: Tim
-Original Message-
From: Geir Magnusson Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nathan Beyer wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Geir Magnusson Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nathan Beyer wrote:
The concern I would have about this is the scenario where it actually
is
a
Hello
I've found a flaw in my logic (while trying to go to sleep this early in the
morning) down below because it is Platform.FILE_SYSTEM which has to be
uninitialized while I've written that it is Platform.NETWORK_SYSTEM. I think
I've just got line lumbers shifted somehow due to attempts to
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Richard Liang wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
Yep, if the spec tells you what the format of the string should be then
follow it (since apps may be dependent upon it), otherwise I'd be
inclined to invent your own
Hello everybody,
I changed the subject to make things clear.
Jimmy, as you mentioned, What's more, I find some operations related to
network are also written
in this way, first select and then read/write/accept/connect, so I guess
all implementation in java.nio.channels shall remove
Paulex,
I also noticed there are several platform-dependent behaviours of
FileChannel.
So I can't wait to see the revised test layout. :)
Will you plan to re-layout NIO test structure recently?
Thank you very much!
On 6/29/06, Paulex Yang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If no one objects, I'm
IIRC Geir was going to ask Sun if we are allowed to copy their
exception messages
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/7/5, Richard Liang [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Richard Liang wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
Yep, if the spec tells you what the format of the
Hello Oliver,
When adding Apache Harmony VM in Eclipse on Linux, an error is
reported System library does not exist:
./jdk/jre/bin/default/kernel.jar. It seems that the
clearvm.properties has not been upgraded to v3.
The following lines:
Yesterday I tried to add a regression test to existing in security module
TestCase, but, found that the TestCase is in exclude list. I had to
un-exclude it, run, check my test passes and exclude the TestCase again – it
was a little bit inconvenient, besides, my new valid (I believe) regression
43 matches
Mail list logo
