I don't think that it makes sense to maintain a completely separate
data structure just because there's a pair of keys. An object that
holds two values will do the job just as well, and there should be no
problem with an object being created, used for a lookup, and then
recycled in the nursery
Yes, AFAIK, SUN still does not support DTD 4.01 in JAVA 6.Refer to [1]
May be they will wait for JAVA 7. And many
developers are calling for DTD 4.01 support. IMO, it's a good idea to
support DTD 4.01 in our project.
Best regards
[1]http://download.java.net/jdk6/docs/api/
2006/7/22, Mikhail
All is in order and in SVN for Harmony-856 wrt BCC and ACQ.
Please vote to accept or reject this codebase into the Apache Harmony
class library :
[ ] + 1 Accept
[ ] -1 Reject (provide reason below)
Lets let this run a minimum of 3 days unless a) someone states they need
more time or b) we get
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
All is in order and in SVN for Harmony-856 wrt BCC and ACQ.
Please vote to accept or reject this codebase into the Apache Harmony
class library :
[ ] + 1 Accept
[ ] -1 Reject (provide reason below)
Lets let this run a minimum of 3 days unless a) someone states
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
All is in order and in SVN for Harmony-948 wrt BCC and ACQ.
Please vote to accept or reject this codebase into the Apache Harmony
class library :
[ ] + 1 Accept
[ ] -1 Reject (provide reason below)
Lets let this run a minimum of 3 days unless a) someone states
Geir Magnusson Jr skrev den 21-07-2006 15:46:
Hm. I'm using ubuntu 6.
I'll go look at your JIRA. Which is it?
You found the JIRA and helped me figuring out the couple of apt-gets needed.
I'll give it a whirl now.
What I did doesn't change how you compile either classlib or drlvm - it
BTW there are a lot of other RFEs:
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/top25_rfes.do Sun is asked to implement.
Some of them are very interesting and could be implemented in Harmony as JDK
extentions: struct/hotcode replacement/ftp support/logging support with
ability to remove it from code like
I would definitely agree these sentiments. Optimization, especially of this
kind, should only take place after correct implementation (which I assume we
already have) and significant negative side-effects can be shown. This
mechanism of optimization just increases the amount of code maintenance
Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr skrev den 21-07-2006 15:46:
Hm. I'm using ubuntu 6.
I'll go look at your JIRA. Which is it?
You found the JIRA and helped me figuring out the couple of apt-gets
needed.
I'll give it a whirl now.
What I did doesn't change how you
Thanks. Those docs are helpful.
Thank,
xiaofeng
On 7/21/06, Morozova, Nadezhda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
I've posted another doc that might be of use to you [1] :-) this is
about plugging in a custom GC implementation.
I was wondering if anyone is actually reading the docs we have
Now that we have a distribution of the VM + classlib in the JRE, we can
start encouraging people to try real applications and tell us what's
wrong. I'm guessing this will be an avalanche of useful information :)
Obviously, the ideal is getting both tests and patches, but I think
that's a lot to
All,
Implementations of the abstract classes from:
http://cs.anu.edu.au/~Steve.Blackburn/private/mmtk-20060714.jar :::
src/org/mmtk/vm/*.java have been created.
They are svn commited at:
drlvm/trunk/vm/MMTk/ext/vm/HarmonyDRLVM/org/apache/HarmonyDRLVM/mm/mmtk/*.java
The ant build.xml has been
Weldon Washburn wrote:
All,
Implementations of the abstract classes from:
http://cs.anu.edu.au/~Steve.Blackburn/private/mmtk-20060714.jar :::
src/org/mmtk/vm/*.java have been created.
This is under CPL, right?
They are svn commited at:
Andrew Zhang wrote:
Hello everybody,
I plan to implement
java.nio.channels.spi.SelectorProvider.inheritedChannel()
method. Currently Harmony simply returns null.
Spec doesn not specify how to detect inheritedChannel clearly, Returns the
channel inherited from the entity that created this
2006/7/24, Jimmy, Jing Lv [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Andrew Zhang wrote:
Hello everybody,
I plan to implement
java.nio.channels.spi.SelectorProvider.inheritedChannel()
method. Currently Harmony simply returns null.
Spec doesn not specify how to detect inheritedChannel clearly, Returns
the
Mikhail Fursov 写道:
BTW there are a lot of other RFEs:
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/top25_rfes.do Sun is asked to implement.
Some of them are very interesting and could be implemented in Harmony
as JDK
extentions: struct/hotcode replacement/ftp support/logging support with
ability to remove
Can we get Java 5 done first? ;)
geir
Mikhail Fursov wrote:
BTW there are a lot of other RFEs:
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/top25_rfes.do Sun is asked to implement.
Some of them are very interesting and could be implemented in Harmony as
JDK
extentions: struct/hotcode replacement/ftp
On the 0x1AD day of Apache Harmony Mikhail Fursov wrote:
I promised to start to investigate devirtualization techniques and here is
the first result:
I hacked the entry-backedge profiler in DRLVM and added the dump of virtual
methods call frequencies when VM is about to be shutted down.
The
Geir Magnusson Jr 写道:
Can we get Java 5 done first? ;)
geir
Yes, of course. :-)
Mikhail Fursov wrote:
BTW there are a lot of other RFEs:
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/top25_rfes.do Sun is asked to implement.
Some of them are very interesting and could be implemented in Harmony as
19 matches
Mail list logo
