Hi, all:
I will raise a jira to remove the generated documents from svn.
On 9/30/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 29, 2006, at 1:03 PM, Paulex Yang wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Sep 28, 2006, at 5:15 AM, Morozova, Nadezhda wrote:
Do you think we can have
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Sep 29, 2006, at 1:03 PM, Paulex Yang wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I'm still pro stuffing the generated content into the svn fo the
website, and then pushing that out, because in the next snapshot, I
want to start getting into the habit of including the
Paulex Yang wrote:
Hi, all
I'm not a security expert, so please correct me if I miss something. I
found some different behavior of Harmony and RI on
javax.security.auth.login.LoginContext, the testcase[1] shows the
difference.
Actually I tried to create the event sequence like below:
1.
On 9/29/06, Mikhail Fursov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
I finished 'unboxed' package implementation in Jitrino.OPT. The patch is
in
JIRA 1489
The potential problems:
1) We still do not have a test suite.
Hmmm... I fixed up the vmmagic test suite and gave it back to the owners .
It should
Mikhail,
HARMONY-816 has been closed. Please open a new JIRA when you are ready.
On 9/29/06, Mikhail Fursov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/29/06, Weldon Washburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alex Astapchuk, Mikhail Fursov,
With the patch blizzard of the last few weeks, Harmony-816 no longer
On 30 Sep 2006 21:01:50 +0700, Egor Pasko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the 0x1F3 day of Apache Harmony Mikhail Fursov wrote:
Egor,
I think this is right suggestion to synchronize our WB and H1580
implementations. AFAIK H1580 uses old JET version and is not
compatible with the latest
Perhaps he means clone the object to a WeakReference then null the original
object ?
That way the only existing copy of that object will be a WeakReference
with my limited
understanding of GC concepts would that no be benificial ?
Regards,
- Vikram Mohan
On 9/19/06, Ivan Volosyuk [EMAIL
