Yeah, it would be easy enough to do :-) I've added some comments in
the header of each file to that effect. As for the (indirect) ties
with o.a.h.k.VM, that's just an implementation issue with the Messages
class; it should be fairly easy to roll out a less specific one for
the pack200 messages.
Cool. I've attached patches for the stuff I've done up until now as
well as rolling back the localisation stuff as a patch in
HARMONY-1871. And, for some reason, I've accidentally created an empty
HARMONY-1870 too ...
Alex.
On 15/10/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree with
PolePosition(actually JFreeChat) throws IllegalPathStateException when
generating test report.The error message looks like (I added a sysout(shape)
in CommonGraphics2D#fill method):
java.awt.geom.Rectangle2D$Double[x=0.0,y=0.0,width=750.0,height=500.0]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Altrenative idea would be to use just architecture name as the first
classification tag for architecture specific issues (including porting to
that arcitecture).
Examples can be: [ipf], [ia32], [em64t], etc.
Example of JIRA could be: [ipf][classlib][awt] natives build is broken
Regards,
It looks like this JIRA has been closed. I ask the below questions. It may
make sense to reopen this JIRA.
1)
Mikhail Fursov said, With this fix JIT precaches all offsets for mananaged
pointers in a method before reporting. Is there a problem if a given live
reference appears in several
Artem,
Thanks. I will take a look.
On 10/12/06, Artem Aliev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guys,
1. Make classlib/modules/portlib directory (or portlib in the root?)
and move hyprt, hysig and hythread code into it. Update build to work
with new directory.
[Andrey]- pull out hythread from
On 10/15/06, Pavel Pervov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Altrenative idea would be to use just architecture name as the first
classification tag for architecture specific issues (including porting to
that arcitecture).
Examples can be: [ipf], [ia32], [em64t], etc.
Example of JIRA could be:
Weldon, I'll try to answer some of your questions. Ivan and Salikh will
correct me.
On 10/16/06, Weldon Washburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1)
Mikhail Fursov said, With this fix JIT precaches all offsets for
mananaged
pointers in a method before reporting. Is there a problem if a given
live
Agree on all points.
--
Best regards,
Ivan
Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
On 10/15/06, Mikhail Fursov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Weldon, I'll try to answer some of your questions. Ivan and Salikh will
correct me.
On 10/16/06, Weldon Washburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1)
Mikhail
Artem,
Thanks for this patch. Works for me on Linux.
Moving common and pool as well seems reasonable.
I'll make a minor modification once Weldon has committed it. (Just to
combine the copy-native-includes-windows and copy-native-includes-linux
actions into a second copy in the
That works for me. then the same token could also be prefixed to
email subject lines, like you suggest.
Note that people should also select more than one category when filing a
platform specific bug/issue/feature/whatever such has DRLVM and
IPF or Classlibrary and Sparc :)
geir
Pavel
Mikhail Fursov wrote:
On 10/15/06, Pavel Pervov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Altrenative idea would be to use just architecture name as the first
classification tag for architecture specific issues (including porting to
that arcitecture).
Examples can be: [ipf], [ia32], [em64t], etc.
Example of
Mikhail Fursov wrote:
6)
Does GCV4 work with jit_gc.diff?
Yes. The rootset reported by JIT is the same. The only change is that
instead of the method 'enumerate(mptr, base)' JIT uses the method
'enumerate(mptr, offset)' that was used before only for mptrs with static
offsets (offsets
Does anyone have an objection to those two JIRAs?
geir
-
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 10/16/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do we care abouve GCv4?
Do you propose to remove it from the trunk? Or will we keep it forever like
a good wine?
--
Mikhail Fursov
It looks like I really do not understand your proposal about JIRA naming.
I do not know what category is. I see the list of independent components
here: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY
and when I create a new issue I can choose only one of the components.
Do you mean that IPF could
Mikhail Fursov wrote:
On 10/16/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do we care abouve GCv4?
Do you propose to remove it from the trunk? Or will we keep it forever like
a good wine?
I like wine.
geir
-
Mikhail Fursov wrote:
It looks like I really do not understand your proposal about JIRA naming.
I do not know what category is. I see the list of independent components
here: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY
yes, that's it.
and when I create a new issue I can choose only one of
On 10/15/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mikhail Fursov wrote:
6)
Does GCV4 work with jit_gc.diff?
Yes. The rootset reported by JIT is the same. The only change is that
instead of the method 'enumerate(mptr, base)' JIT uses the method
'enumerate(mptr, offset)' that was
Ok. I will call it runing Derby on Harmony.:)
On 10/14/06, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leo Li wrote:
During the self-hosting of Derby...
Minor nit, but as Sian pointed out before we would usually reserve
'self-hosting' to mean using Harmony in development of the project
itself, i.e.
Hi Fedotov,
On 10/14/06, Fedotov, Alexei A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tony,
Let's try and converge our visions. BTW, I really like your work about ANT unit
tests.
I really like the webpage too:) It saved much time for me.
What I want is a more flexible one
Could you please give more details
2006/10/14, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Just to add my 2p -- I also agree with doing the work in the trunk. Of
course the minimum cost of working there is that you do no harm to the
other platforms. That is the zeroth level of integration.
The first level of integration would then be to
Some of my comments inlined.
On 10/16/06, Weldon Washburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks like this JIRA has been closed. I ask the below questions. It may
make sense to reopen this JIRA.
1)
Mikhail Fursov said, With this fix JIT precaches all offsets for mananaged
pointers in a method
I'm trying to setup the Build-Test stuff on a Windows XP machine and
I'm running to a weird script failure for the 'classlib' build. I can
run the build perfectly outside of CruiseControl, but this is the
error I'm getting when the build is run by CruiseControl.
console
compile-java:
[echo]
it is easy to fix (readme.txt was updated in the jira 995):
copy the 'apache-ant-1.6.5\lib\ant-apache-regexp.jar' to the 'cc\lib\ant-
apache-regexp.jar' and add the string
set CRUISE_PATH=%CRUISE_PATH%;%LIBDIR%\ant-apache-regexp.jar
to the cruisecontrol.bat file.
thanks, Vladimir
On 10/16/06,
25 matches
Mail list logo
