Re: [build-test] Moving from /enhanced to /standard

+1 go for it On 11/16/06, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well the subject line was build-test (not the actual directory name) and you talk about the testing framework -- so just being clear that you are not talking about the JUnit test suites/structure. Regards, Tim Geir Magnusson Jr.

Re: [general] Announcing Melody

bugs? We don't have bugs. They are contribution opportunities :) geir Jin Mingjian wrote: Good! Do you plan to add some bugs-related charts?

Re: [drlvm][x86_64] status update

Rana Dasgupta wrote: Not surprising :-) The last big stack relatad checkin in 2018. Its comment notes say that Gregory actually saw the failure of StackTest and the new FinalizeStackTest... So... lets fix them... :) geir On 11/16/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: First

RE: [drlvm][unit] 100% of class library tests pass

Geir wrote, I'd prefer if we didn't spam the lists with every good result Ok, the alternative which comes to my mind next is the following. If I understand correctly, Anton's site gets uploaded zip archives, processes them and populates a database. From the outside we can see result sets for

[drlvm][unit] New regression? org.apache.harmony.auth.tests.javax.security.auth.kerberos.serialization.KrbDelegationPermissionCollectionTest

Folks, Has anyone seen the following problem in the whole test run? I cannot reproduce the problem for standalone test. (SuSE 9) testcase classname=org.apache.harmony.auth.tests.javax.security.auth.kerberos.serialization.KrbDelegationPermissionCollectionTest name=testGolden time=0.047

Re: [drlvm][jit][ia-32]register-based fast calling convention

Hi Rana, Thank you for your comments. Please, find my answers inlined. Rana Dasgupta wrote: Hi Alex, This is good, thanks. Please see below... On 11/15/06, Alex Astapchuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, Among other things listed on the JIT Dev tasks, there is a need for calling

Re: [drlvm][unit] New regression? org.apache.harmony.auth.tests.javax.security.auth.kerberos.serialization.KrbDelegationPermissionCollectionTest

what VM? Alexei Fedotov wrote: Folks, Has anyone seen the following problem in the whole test run? I cannot reproduce the problem for standalone test. (SuSE 9) testcase classname=org.apache.harmony.auth.tests.javax.security.auth.kerberos.serialization.KrbDelegationPermissionCollectionTest

RE: [drlvm][unit] New regression? org.apache.harmony.auth.tests.javax.security.auth.kerberos.serialization.KrbDelegationPermissionCollectionTest

DRLVM, Failed 3 times from 6 test runs With best regards, Alexei Fedotov, Intel Java XML Engineering -Original Message- From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 7:00 AM To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [drlvm][unit] New

RE: [general] Announcing Melody

Great! I like the pictures. Sorry for a dumb question, does CruiseControl actually work, or is it a site design sketch? With best regards, Alexei Fedotov, Intel Java XML Engineering -Original Message- From: Stefano Mazzocchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 4:04

Re: [drlvm][jit][ia-32]register-based fast calling convention

Hi Pavel, Thank you for your interest. Pavel Ozhdikhin wrote: Do you know if other VM use register-based fast calling convention and what gain we can get from it? Can we see that using micro-benchmarks? Well, I guess this is quite low level details of an implementation, I did not hear much

Re: [general] Announcing Melody

Fedotov, Alexei A wrote: Great! I like the pictures. Thanks! I'd love to integrate harmonytest.org and this work into one thingy. What do you think? Sorry for a dumb question, does CruiseControl actually work, or is it a site design sketch? it does :-) (it's off at the moment because I'm

Re: [drlvm][jit][ia-32]register-based fast calling convention

Thanks for the clarifications Alex. On 11/16/06, Alex Astapchuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rana Dasgupta wrote: So does this mean one specific convention, fastcall, for C helpers and a second custom DRLVM convention for managed code? Right. I'm going to implement both - the IA-32 fastcall

Re: [drlvm][x86_64] status update

Sadly I am sans a 64 bit Linux box at least temporarily. Sounds hard to believe, I know... On 11/16/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rana Dasgupta wrote: Not surprising :-) The last big stack relatad checkin in 2018. Its comment notes say that Gregory actually saw the

Re: [drlvm][x86_64] status update

it is amazing, since we make them by the truck load :) I've been trying to figure it out - not making much progress as it hoses gdb. Seems like I'm back to Ye Olde Printf School of Debugging. Mañanna... time for sleep geir Rana Dasgupta wrote: Sadly I am sans a 64 bit Linux box at least

[performance] a few early benchmarks

There are lies, damn lies and benchmarks which don't really tell you if an implementation of a program is *faster* but at least it tells you where you're at. So, as Geir managed to get the DSO linking problem go away in DRLVM, I was able to start running some benchmarks. The machine is the

[classlib][linux/x86_32] classlib doesn't buid if X11 is not present

[copy] Copying 1 file to /home/stefano/src/classlib/deploy/jdk/jre/bin [exec] cc -O1 -march=pentium3 -DLINUX -D_REENTRANT -DIPv6_FUNCTION_SUPPORT -DHYX86 -I/home/stefano/src/classlib/deploy/include -I/home/stefano/src/classlib/deploy/jdk/include -I. -I../shared/ -fpic -Icommon

Re: [performance] a few early benchmarks

Stefano, It is a bit unfair to compare *debug* build of Harmony with other release versions :) I suppose all VMs where run in default mode (i.e. no special cmd-line switches)? 2006/11/17, Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED]: There are lies, damn lies and benchmarks which don't really tell

Re: [performance] a few early benchmarks

+1 I'm even impressed how good is Harmony performance shown in debug mode! :) Also, by default DRLVM is tuned for client workloads - fast startup and reasonable performance. If you run heavy benchmarks it worth to use -Xem:server or -Xem:server_static mode to determine the potential of DRLVM.

Re: [drlvm][threading] Should hythread_monitor_init() aquire the monitor?

Gregory, The code which goes after sem_wait doesn't work properly if sem_wait returns with an error code. So we need to either loop until sem_wait returns successfully or adjust the code after sem_wait to handle irregular cases. Thanks Evgueni On 11/16/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [general] Announcing Melody

I like this stone hanging over the harmony! :) What about adding charts for the DRLVM - lines of code, performance trends etc? Thanks, Pavel On 11/17/06, Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Fedotov, Alexei A wrote: Great! I like the pictures. Thanks! I'd love to integrate

Re: [general][testing] cruise control on the WinXP and SUSE linux

Sorry, tonight CC on windows was broken due to internal windows problem :( Yes, it is a good idea to break something locally. I'll try it today. Thanks, Vladimir On 11/16/06, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sounds good -- looking forward to more mail ;-) Regards, Tim Vladimir Ivanov

Re: [drlvm][unit] New regression? org.apache.harmony.auth.tests.javax.security.auth.kerberos.serialization.KrbDelegationPermissionCollectionTest

On 11/17/06, Alexei Fedotov wrote: Folks, Has anyone seen the following problem in the whole test run? I cannot reproduce the problem for standalone test. (SuSE 9) Passed for me. Can you reproduce it by rerunning whole classlib test suite? Thanks, Stepan. testcase classname=

Re: [drlvm][threading] Should hythread_monitor_init() aquire the monitor?

In other words we will observe the crash as we do now if sem_wait completes unsuccessfully for whatever reason... On 11/17/06, Evgueni Brevnov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gregory, The code which goes after sem_wait doesn't work properly if sem_wait returns with an error code. So we need to either

Re: svn commit: r474705 - /incubator/harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/luni/src/main/java/org/apache/harmony/luni/util/DeleteOnExit.java

Tim Ellison wrote: Richard, Can you also convert Tony's test into a regression testcase? I will do it today. Thanks a lot. Best regards, Richard Regards, Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: liangyx Date: Tue Nov 14 00:52:10 2006 New Revision: 474705 URL:

<    1   2