On 6/25/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So this API is really for the classes Method, Field and Class, rather
> than a bigger C API. Does this make it harder for other languages to
> use or implement? (I have to admit it's going to take a few to start
> thinking in C again...
isn't JIRA enough?
On 6/17/05, Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> We have bugzilla for Harmony now (thanks dims):
> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi?product=Harmony
>
>
Hi all,
Please note that I'm not by any means trying to raise a debate of any kind
I'm just trying to brain dump some thoughts about future development
platforms.
I thought I'd share a "strange" thought that bubbled up in my mind while i
was in the metro (aka the underground or the tube). I th
On 6/8/05, Steve Blackburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have never looked at non-free implementations, but I am interested to
> know what this means for those of us who have extensive exposure to
> implementations such as Kaffe (GPL) or Jikes RVM (CPL). My reading of
> it is that I can't work o
On 6/7/05, Archie Cobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
[..]
> > Because it's possible that Sun finds this aspect of Harmony valuable
> > overall, and contributes information to help shape this.
>
> I highly doubt that will happen (just my opinion though).
>
> >> Secondly,
On 6/6/05, Peter Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The reason being that their customers do not
> want to be exposed to differences between rt.jar and GNU Classpath.
oh well aren't both implemented according to a well-designed exported
API. So how there would be differences that would hurt the c
hi Gery,
i read that howto a year ago or something but never tired it
http://www.linuxhq.com/java.html
-ahmed
On 6/2/05, Gerry Steele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anyone got any thoughts on the possibility of making naively executable
> jars on Linux?
>
> This is done on Windows through th
hi all.. as i posted before i was writing a wrapper for JDT to feel like
"javac" (The TCK requires a JVM to look and feel like the Sun JVM, including
the java/javac command lines as noted by Stefano Mazzocchi)... i read the
jasper JDTCompiler class in the tomcat source code ... and i was googlin
hi all.. you know i think we all should work to bring the spirit of harmoney
to the open source movement in general... for example as a web developer i
read about a new php mvc-based framework every couple of days with really
nothing new to introduce to the scene so if all *similiar* open so
>Then, if the VM is written in Java it will be compiled to native code
using,
>for example, gcj?
>or it will be compiled to byte code and will be interpreted by itself?
>I'm a little bit confused about this topic
same goes here
On 5/18/05, Juan Leyva Delgado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Then,
>how much value is there in creating another point of entry?
it's not just for devs who will be compiling the class library in harmony.
it's (or that's what i think) intended to be the "javac" of Hamroy
On 5/18/05, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> just a note... it appears that Ant (
that would be great so people can stop worring about the legal side... and
if anyone wants to know about the current legal situation s/he could check
that list.
On 5/17/05, Stuart Still <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I agree. Perhaps though it might be helpful to split into a legal
> and techni
ok a question... hope it's not that silly anyways... if you did the JVM in
java we would need to compile it (or part of it) to native code... wouldn't
that be a problem when porting to other platforms? (sorry guys if it's so
silly)
On 5/17/05, Ozgur Akan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> JVM in J
can we push some priorities rather than running everywhere.. like
1. decide on a language to use: c, c++, java (did i hear pascal)
2 . an architecture
3.
According to this architecture we will divide our efforts. So we can focus
on more specific subjects
and may be we can do more organized
The "clear need" that Magnusson cites is anything but clear to Gosling, who
says Sun has received negative response from the enterprise development
community regarding the idea of open-source Java."
welcome to the matrix, guys ;)
On 5/17/05, Tomer Barletz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> http://
i'm working on that too.. i'm using args4j to support javac-like option
parsing capabilites... i'm reading the tomcat Jasper source code to learn
more about how they did that (the JDTCompiler class)... would be great if
you wanna share ideas
-ahmed
On 5/17/05, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTE
that would be great
On 5/17/05, Bryce Leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> As harmony is just getting started, there is a great deal of good
> suggestions, questions and offers for help. Ever since the Slashdot
> announcement I personally think that the number of people whom have
> joined and offer
"In addition to the JVM and classpath, the standard JDK tools must be
implemented for Harmony. To promote reuse and facilitate deployment, we
should strive for a single distribution library (called Common Tools Library
or CTL in the image below) on top of the OAL from the JVM project."
does tha
hi all... i'm a computer science student located in cairo, egypt with a
modest experience in c/c++ (wrote some bsd-style sockets and posix stuff)
and designing web applications with java/php i've just read about
harmony yesterday on slashdot and i'm just itching to be invloved... and i
tota
19 matches
Mail list logo
