Sweet, many thanks.
Craig
On Mar 7, 2006, at 9:14 AM, Leo Simons wrote:
Taking care of this now...
I will note that this makes it even more important for committers and
active contributors to subscribe to the commits mailing list - a
lot of
important information is in those jira messages.
One of the cooler Jira features is the mailing list integration. You
can subscribe it to the mailing list, after which it will
automatically scan email subjects for issue identifiers (i.e. HARMONY-
) and add the email content as a comment to the referenced issue,
including attachments.
I am on a Mac as well, and IIRC when setting up SVN originally I
found the binary available from Fink did not support SSL. The binary
available from Metassian does, however, and it seems to work pretty
well:
http://metissian.com/projects/macosx/subversion/
Craig
On Jan 17, 2006, at 9:40
Seems like the difference is that once the little bootstrap piece is
done you wouldn't need to recompile it every time... heck, you might
not ever have to if you could just download a little binary for your
platform.
Craig
On Nov 4, 2005, at 4:21 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Nov 4,
Some of us are still hoping for a mostly Java based implementation.
While I am apparently too tainted to contribute much, it will make
it a lot more fun to play around with.
Craig
On Nov 1, 2005, at 6:05 PM, Robin Garner wrote:
Rodrigo Kumpera wrote:
On 11/1/05, Robin Garner [EMAIL
much of the standard libraries would be
rendered non-functional without the VM specific classes from Sun,
however.
Craig Blake
On Jun 5, 2005, at 5:32 PM, Peter Donald wrote:
Hi,
It seems like there is a little bit of heat being generated by this
topic due to confusion. While Geir has
way to
have it post
summaries or a digest at reasonable intervals instead?
Craig
On May 24, 2005, at 9:38 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
--- Craig Blake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, please. Not sure if these are really valuable
anyways.
What, People? :)
-Matt
Thanks,
Craig
On May 24
I was discussing this recently and the view was put that really
this level of scalability was probably not worth the various
sacrifices associated with the approach (our load balancing leaves
something to be desired, for example). So as far as I know, most
VMs these days just rely on
Seems to me that you might want to be open to either using the
platform's threading when a platform has good scalability, and punt
and do it in VM when the platform doesn't offer it.
If it can be done then I am all for it. Once the Harmony VM becomes
modular it is something that can
Just out of curiosity, can anyone familiar with the various OSS VM
implementations being discussed share their insights regarding the
respective threading capabilities? I have heard of some commercial
specialty VMs handling upwards of 30,000 concurrent threads easily
and it would be
10 matches
Mail list logo
