Re: [DRLVM/MMTk] v0.1 porting layer has been committed

Weldon, I've updated the magics.cpp with fromLong/toLong fixed. But I suspect other issues as well, and I'm working on it, so please expect more commits of magics.cpp to come. -- Thanks, Alex Alex Astapchuk wrote: Weldon, I also recently discovered what could be problem with jitrino.JET

Re: [DRLVM/MMTk] v0.1 porting layer has been committed

On 7/24/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Weldon Washburn wrote: On 7/23/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are you up-to-date? We don't have ij.exe anymore... I just did a clean svn checkout and now can build java.exe. Actually, I tried several times over the

Re: [DRLVM/MMTk] v0.1 porting layer has been committed

On 7/25/06, Alex Astapchuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Weldon, I've updated the magics.cpp with fromLong/toLong fixed. But I suspect other issues as well, and I'm working on it, so please expect more commits of magics.cpp to come. Please reserve the word commit to refer to an svn commit.

Re: [DRLVM/MMTk] v0.1 porting layer has been committed

Weldon, I also recently discovered what could be problem with jitrino.JET compiling OPCODE_LCMP. Jitrino.JET is core dumping. This problem I'm looking into the issue. Could you please share the class/method that causes assertion ? -- Thanks, Alex Weldon Washburn wrote: All,

Re: [DRLVM/MMTk] v0.1 porting layer has been committed

On 7/23/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Weldon Washburn wrote: All, Implementations of the abstract classes from: http://cs.anu.edu.au/~Steve.Blackburn/private/mmtk-20060714.jar ::: src/org/mmtk/vm/*.java have been created. This is under CPL, right? Exactly. MMTk is

Re: [DRLVM/MMTk] v0.1 porting layer has been committed

Weldon Washburn wrote: On 7/23/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are you up-to-date? We don't have ij.exe anymore... Actually, I tried several times over the weekend to do a fresh, new svn checkout. I rolled back to a two week old revision. classlib and drlvm downloaded OK

[DRLVM/MMTk] v0.1 porting layer has been committed

All, Implementations of the abstract classes from: http://cs.anu.edu.au/~Steve.Blackburn/private/mmtk-20060714.jar ::: src/org/mmtk/vm/*.java have been created. They are svn commited at: drlvm/trunk/vm/MMTk/ext/vm/HarmonyDRLVM/org/apache/HarmonyDRLVM/mm/mmtk/*.java The ant build.xml has been

Re: [DRLVM/MMTk] v0.1 porting layer has been committed

Weldon Washburn wrote: All, Implementations of the abstract classes from: http://cs.anu.edu.au/~Steve.Blackburn/private/mmtk-20060714.jar ::: src/org/mmtk/vm/*.java have been created. This is under CPL, right? They are svn commited at: