Steve Liao wrote:
I would like to find out how other Harmony developers want to solve
some basic JIT/VM interfacing. One area is stack maps for precise
enumeration of live object references. There are many options on how
the VM and JIT can handle this info. For example, the JIT can store
the
Steve Liao wrote:
I was just wondering if a unified format (more than a unified interface)
makes sense for Harmony. One advantage is to allow GC to enumerate
without relying on JIT. Any other benefit?
Of course, both ways could work.
At a high level, the stack maps are a data structure
On 8/23/05, Michael Hind [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Liao wrote:
I would like to find out how other Harmony developers want to solve
some basic JIT/VM interfacing. One area is stack maps for precise
enumeration of live object references.
Does anyone know how other open source JVMs
Steve Liao wrote:
We cache the stack map info in the VM. VM only handles the storage,
but JIT controls the interpretation. The rationale is that we want to
let JIT focus on compilation, not on storage. However, since JIT
controls the interpretation, unified format on stack map is not
Steve Liao wrote:
I would like to find out how other Harmony developers want to solve
some basic JIT/VM interfacing. One area is stack maps for precise
enumeration of live object references.
Does anyone know how other open source JVMs do the above?
Jikes RVM's compilers (baseline
