>-Original Message-
>From: Oleg Khaschansky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 3:28 PM
>To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [classlib][swing] compatibility:
j.s.text.GapContent.replace()
>behaviour
>
>+1. Silently doing nothi
>-Original Message-
>From: Stepan Mishura [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 1:49 PM
>To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [classlib][swing] compatibility:
j.s.text.GapContent.replace()
>behaviour
>
>On 11/3/06
On 11/3/06, Ivanov, Alexey A wrote:
>-Original Message-
>From: Stepan Mishura
>Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 9:43 AM
>To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [classlib][swing] compatibility:
j.s.text.GapContent.replace()
>behaviour
>
>On 11/2/06
>-Original Message-
>From: Stepan Mishura [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 9:43 AM
>To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [classlib][swing] compatibility:
j.s.text.GapContent.replace()
>behaviour
>
>On 11/2/06, Ivanov, Alex
On 11/2/06, Ivanov, Alexey A wrote:
Hi all,
I've started fixing HARMONY-1809. To remove throws clause from the
declaration of replace method, as it was proposed by Oleg in
HARMONY-1975, I placed removeItems() and insertItems() calls into
try-catch block. This would work OK for any valid argumen
>-Original Message-
>From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 5:03 PM
>To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [classlib][swing] compatibility:
j.s.text.GapContent.replace()
>behaviour
>
>Why not?
It was deci
>-Original Message-
>From: Tim Ellison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 5:26 PM
>To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [classlib][swing] compatibility:
j.s.text.GapContent.replace()
>behaviour
>
>Ivanov, Alexey A wrote:
&
Ivanov, Alexey A wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Alexey Petrenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 3:50 PM
>> To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [classlib][swing] compatibility:
> j.s.text.GapContent.rep
Why not?
Ivanov, Alexey A wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Alexey Petrenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 3:50 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [classlib][swing] compatibility:
j.s.text.GapContent.replace()
behaviour
HARMONY-1975is
>-Original Message-
>From: Alexey Petrenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 3:50 PM
>To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [classlib][swing] compatibility:
j.s.text.GapContent.replace()
>behaviour
>
>HARMONY-1975is already ap
Could you, please, look at the unit test in #1809 also?
On 11/2/06, Oleg Khaschansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, but the GapContent changes were not applied.
On 11/2/06, Alexey Petrenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> HARMONY-1975is already applied and closed ;)
>
> 2006/11/2, Alexey Petrenko
Yes, but the GapContent changes were not applied.
On 11/2/06, Alexey Petrenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
HARMONY-1975is already applied and closed ;)
2006/11/2, Alexey Petrenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'll take care of 1975.
>
> SY, Alexey
>
> 2006/11/2, Oleg Khaschansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
HARMONY-1975is already applied and closed ;)
2006/11/2, Alexey Petrenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I'll take care of 1975.
SY, Alexey
2006/11/2, Oleg Khaschansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> +1. Silently doing nothing if invalid parameters are passed seems to
> me a right behavior in this case.
>
> Will s
I'll take care of 1975.
SY, Alexey
2006/11/2, Oleg Khaschansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
+1. Silently doing nothing if invalid parameters are passed seems to
me a right behavior in this case.
Will someone apply changes to GapContent from the harmony-1975.patch
or we need to make a separate patch fo
+1. Silently doing nothing if invalid parameters are passed seems to
me a right behavior in this case.
Will someone apply changes to GapContent from the harmony-1975.patch
or we need to make a separate patch for this?
On 11/2/06, Alexey Petrenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2006/11/2, Ivanov, Ale
2006/11/2, Ivanov, Alexey A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi all,
I've started fixing HARMONY-1809. To remove throws clause from the
declaration of replace method, as it was proposed by Oleg in
HARMONY-1975, I placed removeItems() and insertItems() calls into
try-catch block. This would work OK for any v
Hi all,
I've started fixing HARMONY-1809. To remove throws clause from the
declaration of replace method, as it was proposed by Oleg in
HARMONY-1975, I placed removeItems() and insertItems() calls into
try-catch block. This would work OK for any valid arguments.
I was going to handle invalid argu
17 matches
Mail list logo
