[classlib] Re: [jira] Created: (HARMONY-1088) ava.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: sun/misc/BASE64Encoder

2006-08-08 Thread Mikhail Loenko
I'm not sure it's legal to put any classes to sun.* packages Opinions? Thanks, Mikhail 2006/8/8, Martín Córdova (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ava.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: sun/misc/BASE64Encoder -- Key: HARMONY-1088

Re: [classlib] Re: [jira] Created: (HARMONY-1088) ava.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: sun/misc/BASE64Encoder

2006-08-08 Thread Alex Blewitt
I concur. We should not have any sun.* packages. Any program that explicitly depends on a sun.* class should fail. Alex. On 08/08/06, Mikhail Loenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not sure it's legal to put any classes to sun.* packages Opinions? Thanks, Mikhail 2006/8/8, Martín Córdova

Re: [classlib] Re: [jira] Created: (HARMONY-1088) ava.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: sun/misc/BASE64Encoder

2006-08-08 Thread Paulex Yang
Agree, and we actually have a Base64 utility in o.a.h.luni.util, we can suggest users to refactor to this class (of course we may need to refactor our Base64's interface if necessary), and make the suggestion at some well known place. Alex Blewitt wrote: I concur. We should not have any

Re: [classlib] Re: [jira] Created: (HARMONY-1088) ava.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: sun/misc/BASE64Encoder

2006-08-08 Thread Tim Ellison
Mikhail Loenko wrote: I'm not sure it's legal to put any classes to sun.* packages Opinions? Unwise and unwanted for sure, but illegal? on what grounds? Regards, Tim Thanks, Mikhail 2006/8/8, Martín Córdova (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ava.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:

Re: [classlib] Re: [jira] Created: (HARMONY-1088) ava.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: sun/misc/BASE64Encoder

2006-08-08 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
Mikhail Loenko wrote: I'm not sure it's legal to put any classes to sun.* packages Opinions? Yes, it's legal. I think we're going to want to do this for compatibility reasons, and eventually wean people off of it. geir Thanks, Mikhail 2006/8/8, Martín Córdova (JIRA) [EMAIL

Re: [classlib] Re: [jira] Created: (HARMONY-1088) ava.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: sun/misc/BASE64Encoder

2006-08-08 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
Alex Blewitt wrote: I concur. We should not have any sun.* packages. Any program that explicitly depends on a sun.* class should fail. I don't agree. I think that we will certainly have sun packages like sun.misc.Unsafe, and I suspect there are a few others that we'll want to have to not

Re: [classlib] Re: [jira] Created: (HARMONY-1088) ava.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: sun/misc/BASE64Encoder

2006-08-08 Thread Stepan Mishura
On 8/8/06, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: Alex Blewitt wrote: I concur. We should not have any sun.* packages. Any program that explicitly depends on a sun.* class should fail. I don't agree. I think that we will certainly have sun packages like sun.misc.Unsafe, and I suspect there are a few

Re: [classlib] Re: [jira] Created: (HARMONY-1088) ava.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: sun/misc/BASE64Encoder

2006-08-08 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
Tim Ellison wrote: Alex Blewitt wrote: I concur. We should not have any sun.* packages. Agreed, though deep down I expect that we'll end up creating a JAR that implements a small set of impl types -- for example, lots of 1.4 apps seem to use sun.io.CharToByteConverter and friends before