t;To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen
documentation?
>
>Alexei,
>
>Metric is simply the number of Doxygen warnings for file. Sorry for
>not mentioning this in my letter.
>If some file doesn't have Doxygen comments at all t
care.
Thank you,
Nadya Morozova
>-Original Message-
>From: Alexei Fedotov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 8:48 PM
>To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen
documentation?
>
>Andrey,
&g
va
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Andrey Yakushev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 7:46 PM
> >To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >Subject: Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen
> documentation?
> >
&
ou,
Nadya Morozova
>-Original Message-
>From: Alexei Fedotov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 8:48 PM
>To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen
documentation?
>
>Andrey,
>
>I
a
>> > l trace, ObjectReference object) are not documented:
>> > parameter trace
>>
>> does it make sense to convert warnings to quality metrics and put on
>> harmonytest.org (or even Wiki) regularly? It should encourage people
>> (like me) to document sources bet
ssage-
>From: Andrey Yakushev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 7:46 PM
>To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen
documentation?
>
>Alexei's metric is interesting, but sometimes sho
7:46 PM
>To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen
documentation?
>
>Alexei's metric is interesting, but sometimes shows strange results
>for pretty good docs, like for quite commented files:
>
>0 verifier_8h.html
>0 structVerif
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 7:46 PM
>To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen
documentation?
>
>Alexei's metric is interesting, but sometimes shows strange results
>for pretty good docs, l
>-Original Message-
> >From: Morozova, Nadezhda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 6:26 PM
> >To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >Subject: RE: Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen
> >documentation?
> >
> >Ego
Mikhail,
Sorry, I'm a bit slow. From my perspective making a documentation
bundle from inter-component interfaces is an excellent idea! I started
collecting interfaces from vm/include directory.
Are there any other bundles a community is interested in? Being closer
to the point, let me ask if yo
ursov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 4:30 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen
documentation?
On 07 Nov 2006 19:08:35 +0600, Egor Pasko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > Another problem: a
On 07 Nov 2006 21:17:45 +0600, Egor Pasko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do we feel that it is time to set responsibilities on documenting
vm/include/* ?
+1 To start working on intercomponent interfaces. Going to commit a couple
of EM interface files with documentation tomorrow. I do not believe
On the 0x21A day of Apache Harmony Mikhail Fursov wrote:
> On 07 Nov 2006 19:08:35 +0600, Egor Pasko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Another problem: anyone who changes a document behaviour must update
> > > comments too :(
> >
> > excuse me, what is "document behaviour"? :)
> >
>
> Read
: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen
documentation?
On the 0x21A day of Apache Harmony Mikhail Fursov wrote:
> On 11/7/06, Morozova, Nadezhda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > "For in much wisdom is much grief: and he that increaseth knowle
On 07 Nov 2006 19:08:35 +0600, Egor Pasko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Another problem: anyone who changes a document behaviour must update
> comments too :(
excuse me, what is "document behaviour"? :)
Read it as 'method/function behaviour'. I mean if you have good comments in
file you can
On the 0x21A day of Apache Harmony Mikhail Fursov wrote:
> On 11/7/06, Morozova, Nadezhda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > "For in much wisdom is much grief: and he that increaseth knowledge
> increaseth sorrow"
>
> I'm also +1 to document all of our sources. But it's not always possi
On 11/7/06, Morozova, Nadezhda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
"For in much wisdom is much grief: and he that increaseth knowledge
increaseth sorrow"
I'm also +1 to document all of our sources. But it's not always possible to
write a meaningful comment without a lot of "TODO", "this is a worka
+1
Thank you,
Nadya Morozova
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Egor Pasko
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 11:23 AM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen
documentation?
On the 0x216 day of
ou,
> >Nadya Morozova
> >
> >
> >-Original Message-
> >From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Egor Pasko
> >Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 12:18 PM
> >To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >Subject: Re: [doc] What should be improv
, we can have people volunteer to fix
>things - like David L. did for bytecode.h! see - my way is working
>already :0
>
>Thank you,
>Nadya Morozova
>
>
>-----Original Message-
>From: Alexei Fedotov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 1:56 AM
>To: harmo
tion comment.
>Never mind, I think this type of info is not necessary at this stage:)
>
>Thank you,
>Nadya Morozova
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Fedotov, Alexei A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 7:36 PM
>To: harmony-dev@incubator.a
stage:)
Thank you,
Nadya Morozova
-Original Message-
From: Fedotov, Alexei A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 7:36 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen
documentation?
Nadya wrote,
> we could c
ce
With best regards,
Alexei Fedotov,
Intel Java & XML Engineering
>-Original Message-
>From: Morozova, Nadezhda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 6:26 PM
>To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: RE: Re: [doc] What should be improved in D
Fedotov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 11:27 AM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen
documentation?
Egor,
Thank you for your interest. Here is an algorithm:
1. Create a list of words from HTML files.
2. Merge
From: Alexei Fedotov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 1:56 AM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen
documentation?
Nadya,
You asked good questions. Here are few answers:
1. Grouping of results is implied by do
your opinion.
Thank you,
Nadya Morozova
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Egor Pasko
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 12:18 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen
documentation?
On the 0x216 d
Nadya,
It is excellent! Thank you.
Best regards,
Leviev Ilia
-Original Message-
From: Morozova, Nadezhda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 5:14 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen
documentation
ay, November 02, 2006 11:33 PM
> To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation?
>
> Nadya, All,
> I have ranked the quality of Doxygen-generated DRLVM documentation and
> posted it to the following Wiki page:
>
>
Egor,
I pursued a requirement to compare HTML documents of a different
nature. For this requirement comparing a number of documented items vs
not documented ones doesn't work. For source files your metrics is the
best.
Let me comment on unique words. The goal was to subtract words like
Copyright
er 02, 2006 11:33 PM
> To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation?
>
> Nadya, All,
> I have ranked the quality of Doxygen-generated DRLVM documentation and
> posted it to the following Wiki page:
>
>
: Fedotov, Alexei A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 11:33 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation?
Nadya, All,
I have ranked the quality of Doxygen-generated DRLVM documentation and
posted it to the
.org
Subject: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation?
Nadya, All,
I have ranked the quality of Doxygen-generated DRLVM documentation and
posted it to the following Wiki page:
http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/DRLVM_Documentation_Quality
All are welcome to check masterpiece
On the 0x216 day of Apache Harmony Alexei Fedotov wrote:
> Egor,
>
> Thank you for your interest.
We definitely need to improve our documentation. Necessity is not a
real interest :)
> Here is an algorithm:
>
> 1. Create a list of words from HTML files.
> 2. Merge a dictionary of all words use
Egor,
Thank you for your interest. Here is an algorithm:
1. Create a list of words from HTML files.
2. Merge a dictionary of all words used in documentation.
3. Remove a half of the most frequently used words from the dictionary
- I believe they do not add much sense.
4. Remove misspelled words
ink we can have some post
> > processing of the raw data that your script produces - to see the big
> > picture? We have some metrics: graphics, pie charts, anything. This
> > would instantly show the most important conclusions. I could do such
> > metrics and post them regularly on W
om: Fedotov, Alexei A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 11:33 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation?
Nadya, All,
I have ranked the quality of Doxygen-generated DRLVM documentation and
posted it to the f
info, I'd volunteer to help.
Thank you,
Nadya Morozova
-Original Message-
From: Fedotov, Alexei A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 11:33 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation?
Nad
Nadya, All,
I have ranked the quality of Doxygen-generated DRLVM documentation and
posted it to the following Wiki page:
http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/DRLVM_Documentation_Quality
All are welcome to check masterpieces of our documentation. All
volunteers are welcome to improve page ranks by
38 matches
Mail list logo