RE: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation?

2006-11-17 Thread Morozova, Nadezhda
t;To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org >Subject: Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation? > >Alexei, > >Metric is simply the number of Doxygen warnings for file. Sorry for >not mentioning this in my letter. >If some file doesn't have Doxygen comments at all t

Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation?

2006-11-17 Thread Andrey Yakushev
care. Thank you, Nadya Morozova >-Original Message- >From: Alexei Fedotov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 8:48 PM >To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org >Subject: Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation? > >Andrey, &g

Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation?

2006-11-17 Thread Andrey Yakushev
va > > >-Original Message- > >From: Andrey Yakushev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 7:46 PM > >To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org > >Subject: Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen > documentation? > > &

RE: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation?

2006-11-16 Thread Morozova, Nadezhda
ou, Nadya Morozova >-Original Message- >From: Alexei Fedotov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 8:48 PM >To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org >Subject: Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation? > >Andrey, > >I&#

Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation?

2006-11-16 Thread Alexei Fedotov
a >> > l trace, ObjectReference object) are not documented: >> > parameter trace >> >> does it make sense to convert warnings to quality metrics and put on >> harmonytest.org (or even Wiki) regularly? It should encourage people >> (like me) to document sources bet

Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation?

2006-11-16 Thread Andrey Yakushev
ssage- >From: Andrey Yakushev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 7:46 PM >To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org >Subject: Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation? > >Alexei's metric is interesting, but sometimes sho

RE: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation?

2006-11-16 Thread Morozova, Nadezhda
7:46 PM >To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org >Subject: Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation? > >Alexei's metric is interesting, but sometimes shows strange results >for pretty good docs, like for quite commented files: > >0 verifier_8h.html >0 structVerif

RE: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation?

2006-11-16 Thread Morozova, Nadezhda
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 7:46 PM >To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org >Subject: Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation? > >Alexei's metric is interesting, but sometimes shows strange results >for pretty good docs, l

Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation?

2006-11-16 Thread Andrey Yakushev
>-Original Message- > >From: Morozova, Nadezhda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 6:26 PM > >To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org > >Subject: RE: Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen > >documentation? > > > >Ego

Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation?

2006-11-15 Thread Alexei Fedotov
Mikhail, Sorry, I'm a bit slow. From my perspective making a documentation bundle from inter-component interfaces is an excellent idea! I started collecting interfaces from vm/include directory. Are there any other bundles a community is interested in? Being closer to the point, let me ask if yo

RE: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation?

2006-11-07 Thread Morozova, Nadezhda
ursov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 4:30 PM To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation? On 07 Nov 2006 19:08:35 +0600, Egor Pasko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Another problem: a

Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation?

2006-11-07 Thread Mikhail Fursov
On 07 Nov 2006 21:17:45 +0600, Egor Pasko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Do we feel that it is time to set responsibilities on documenting vm/include/* ? +1 To start working on intercomponent interfaces. Going to commit a couple of EM interface files with documentation tomorrow. I do not believe

Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation?

2006-11-07 Thread Egor Pasko
On the 0x21A day of Apache Harmony Mikhail Fursov wrote: > On 07 Nov 2006 19:08:35 +0600, Egor Pasko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Another problem: anyone who changes a document behaviour must update > > > comments too :( > > > > excuse me, what is "document behaviour"? :) > > > > Read

RE: Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation?

2006-11-07 Thread Morozova, Nadezhda
: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation? On the 0x21A day of Apache Harmony Mikhail Fursov wrote: > On 11/7/06, Morozova, Nadezhda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > "For in much wisdom is much grief: and he that increaseth knowle

Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation?

2006-11-07 Thread Mikhail Fursov
On 07 Nov 2006 19:08:35 +0600, Egor Pasko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Another problem: anyone who changes a document behaviour must update > comments too :( excuse me, what is "document behaviour"? :) Read it as 'method/function behaviour'. I mean if you have good comments in file you can

Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation?

2006-11-07 Thread Egor Pasko
On the 0x21A day of Apache Harmony Mikhail Fursov wrote: > On 11/7/06, Morozova, Nadezhda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > "For in much wisdom is much grief: and he that increaseth knowledge > increaseth sorrow" > > I'm also +1 to document all of our sources. But it's not always possi

Re: Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation?

2006-11-07 Thread Mikhail Fursov
On 11/7/06, Morozova, Nadezhda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1 "For in much wisdom is much grief: and he that increaseth knowledge increaseth sorrow" I'm also +1 to document all of our sources. But it's not always possible to write a meaningful comment without a lot of "TODO", "this is a worka

RE: Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation?

2006-11-07 Thread Morozova, Nadezhda
+1 Thank you, Nadya Morozova -Original Message- From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Egor Pasko Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 11:23 AM To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation? On the 0x216 day of

Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation?

2006-11-07 Thread Egor Pasko
ou, > >Nadya Morozova > > > > > >-Original Message- > >From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Egor Pasko > >Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 12:18 PM > >To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org > >Subject: Re: [doc] What should be improv

RE: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation?

2006-11-03 Thread Fedotov, Alexei A
, we can have people volunteer to fix >things - like David L. did for bytecode.h! see - my way is working >already :0 > >Thank you, >Nadya Morozova > > >-----Original Message- >From: Alexei Fedotov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 1:56 AM >To: harmo

RE: Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation?

2006-11-03 Thread Fedotov, Alexei A
tion comment. >Never mind, I think this type of info is not necessary at this stage:) > >Thank you, >Nadya Morozova > > >-Original Message- >From: Fedotov, Alexei A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 7:36 PM >To: harmony-dev@incubator.a

RE: Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation?

2006-11-03 Thread Morozova, Nadezhda
stage:) Thank you, Nadya Morozova -Original Message- From: Fedotov, Alexei A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 7:36 PM To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation? Nadya wrote, > we could c

RE: Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation?

2006-11-03 Thread Fedotov, Alexei A
ce With best regards, Alexei Fedotov, Intel Java & XML Engineering >-Original Message- >From: Morozova, Nadezhda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 6:26 PM >To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org >Subject: RE: Re: [doc] What should be improved in D

RE: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation?

2006-11-03 Thread Morozova, Nadezhda
Fedotov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 11:27 AM To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation? Egor, Thank you for your interest. Here is an algorithm: 1. Create a list of words from HTML files. 2. Merge

RE: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation?

2006-11-03 Thread Morozova, Nadezhda
From: Alexei Fedotov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 1:56 AM To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation? Nadya, You asked good questions. Here are few answers: 1. Grouping of results is implied by do

RE: Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation?

2006-11-03 Thread Morozova, Nadezhda
your opinion. Thank you, Nadya Morozova -Original Message- From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Egor Pasko Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 12:18 PM To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation? On the 0x216 d

RE: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation?

2006-11-03 Thread Leviev, Ilia A
Nadya, It is excellent! Thank you. Best regards, Leviev Ilia -Original Message- From: Morozova, Nadezhda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 5:14 PM To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation

RE: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation?

2006-11-03 Thread Morozova, Nadezhda
ay, November 02, 2006 11:33 PM > To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation? > > Nadya, All, > I have ranked the quality of Doxygen-generated DRLVM documentation and > posted it to the following Wiki page: > >

Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation?

2006-11-03 Thread Alexei Fedotov
Egor, I pursued a requirement to compare HTML documents of a different nature. For this requirement comparing a number of documented items vs not documented ones doesn't work. For source files your metrics is the best. Let me comment on unique words. The goal was to subtract words like Copyright

RE: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation?

2006-11-03 Thread Leviev, Ilia A
er 02, 2006 11:33 PM > To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation? > > Nadya, All, > I have ranked the quality of Doxygen-generated DRLVM documentation and > posted it to the following Wiki page: > >

Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation?

2006-11-03 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
: Fedotov, Alexei A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 11:33 PM To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation? Nadya, All, I have ranked the quality of Doxygen-generated DRLVM documentation and posted it to the

RE: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation?

2006-11-03 Thread Leviev, Ilia A
.org Subject: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation? Nadya, All, I have ranked the quality of Doxygen-generated DRLVM documentation and posted it to the following Wiki page: http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/DRLVM_Documentation_Quality All are welcome to check masterpiece

Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation?

2006-11-03 Thread Egor Pasko
On the 0x216 day of Apache Harmony Alexei Fedotov wrote: > Egor, > > Thank you for your interest. We definitely need to improve our documentation. Necessity is not a real interest :) > Here is an algorithm: > > 1. Create a list of words from HTML files. > 2. Merge a dictionary of all words use

Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation?

2006-11-03 Thread Alexei Fedotov
Egor, Thank you for your interest. Here is an algorithm: 1. Create a list of words from HTML files. 2. Merge a dictionary of all words used in documentation. 3. Remove a half of the most frequently used words from the dictionary - I believe they do not add much sense. 4. Remove misspelled words

Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation?

2006-11-02 Thread Egor Pasko
ink we can have some post > > processing of the raw data that your script produces - to see the big > > picture? We have some metrics: graphics, pie charts, anything. This > > would instantly show the most important conclusions. I could do such > > metrics and post them regularly on W

Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation?

2006-11-02 Thread Alexei Fedotov
om: Fedotov, Alexei A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 11:33 PM To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation? Nadya, All, I have ranked the quality of Doxygen-generated DRLVM documentation and posted it to the f

RE: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation?

2006-11-02 Thread Morozova, Nadezhda
info, I'd volunteer to help. Thank you, Nadya Morozova -Original Message- From: Fedotov, Alexei A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 11:33 PM To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation? Nad

[doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen documentation?

2006-11-02 Thread Fedotov, Alexei A
Nadya, All, I have ranked the quality of Doxygen-generated DRLVM documentation and posted it to the following Wiki page: http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/DRLVM_Documentation_Quality All are welcome to check masterpieces of our documentation. All volunteers are welcome to improve page ranks by