On 5/25/06, Oliver Deakin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Vladimir Gorr wrote:
> On 5/25/06, Oliver Deakin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>> > Some stuff that got lost (because I got consumed by J1 and I was the
>> > only one pushing on it) was the idea of ensuring that
>>
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Vladimir Gorr wrote:
whether does it mean the HDK will contain the sources (src.zip?) as
well?
Otherwise I don't understand what can be modified. Could you please
clarify
this?
I know you addressed to oliver, but let me take a wack at it to see if
I grok everyt
Vladimir Gorr wrote:
On 5/25/06, Oliver Deakin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> Some stuff that got lost (because I got consumed by J1 and I was the
> only one pushing on it) was the idea of ensuring that
>
> 1) the HDK could be anywhere - the was no hard-wired spot. That
Vladimir Gorr wrote:
whether does it mean the HDK will contain the sources (src.zip?) as well?
Otherwise I don't understand what can be modified. Could you please clarify
this?
I know you addressed to oliver, but let me take a wack at it to see if I
grok everything
One of the many mo
Alexey Petrenko wrote:
2006/5/25, Oliver Deakin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I imagine that an HDK would come in a zip format, much like the current
snapshots [2].
I also suggest to add build date into zip name and internal directory name.
Something like HDK_20060525/deploy and so on...
Yes, I assu
Oliver Deakin wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Some stuff that got lost (because I got consumed by J1 and I was the
only one pushing on it) was the idea of ensuring that
1) the HDK could be anywhere - the was no hard-wired spot. That
allowed having multiple simultaneous HDKs (ex different s
On 5/25/06, Oliver Deakin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> Some stuff that got lost (because I got consumed by J1 and I was the
> only one pushing on it) was the idea of ensuring that
>
> 1) the HDK could be anywhere - the was no hard-wired spot. That
> allowed having multi
2006/5/25, Oliver Deakin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I imagine that an HDK would come in a zip format, much like the current
snapshots [2].
I also suggest to add build date into zip name and internal directory name.
Something like HDK_20060525/deploy and so on...
It will let us keep few copies of HDK
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Some stuff that got lost (because I got consumed by J1 and I was the
only one pushing on it) was the idea of ensuring that
1) the HDK could be anywhere - the was no hard-wired spot. That
allowed having multiple simultaneous HDKs (ex different snapshot
version) at the
Some stuff that got lost (because I got consumed by J1 and I was the
only one pushing on it) was the idea of ensuring that
1) the HDK could be anywhere - the was no hard-wired spot. That allowed
having multiple simultaneous HDKs (ex different snapshot version) at the
same time as a full build
10 matches
Mail list logo