"Erik Meijer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote,
> First of al I want to apologize, especially to Manuel, for
> the immoderate amount of emotion in my previous
> message.
Already forgotten.
> As a scientist I find it rather frustrating that H/Direct
> is associated so strongly with COM (which is very
Tue, 24 Aug 1999 09:28:51 -0700 (PDT), Ronald J. Legere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze:
> It WOULD be nice if you could match on functions and not just
> constructors. But I presume that the constructor/function dichotomy
> in Haskell is what allows it to be strongly typed?
How would you define the s
On Tue, 24 Aug 1999, Ronald J. Legere wrote:
> It WOULD be nice if you could match on functions and not just
> constructors. But I presume that the constructor/function dichotomy
> in Haskell is what allows it to be strongly typed? For example, in the
> untyped 'language' Mathematica employs, p
>> How many times do I have to repeat that H/DIRECT IS NOT TIED TO MS OR COM,
>> once again H/DIRECT IS NOT TIED TO MS OR COM!
> It would probably be more effective if you could list for us
> the non-MS non-COM platforms that H/Direct supports.
> Unless, of course, that list is empty.
I was won
I just convinced my local sysadmin to attach a new MIME type to outgoing
Haskell programs sent by our web server, namely "application/x-haskell".
He was willing to do it, but wanted me to query the Haskell community to
make sure there wasn't any sort of de facto standard in use already. This
mess
On 23-Aug-1999, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sun, 22 Aug 1999 00:30:29 +0200, Erik Meijer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze:
>
> > Well, in some sense .h files are a dedicated interface language
> > (and IDl is nothing more than a header file with some directional
> > attributes
On 23-Aug-1999, Mr. Laszlo Nemeth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul Hudak wrote:
>
> > P.S. I really like the idea someone suggested of maintaining a list of
> > open projects, who's working on what, etc. as in the Linux community.
>
> One major difference between the Linux community and the Ha
Thanks Marko for setting up the Haskell Wiki!
I've just added a FrequentlyAskedQuestions section, for common
questions asked by people (relatively) new to Haskell. I've also added
a LessFrequentlyAskedQuestions section for theoretical issues, and a
CommonHaskellIdioms page to help people lear
On 23-Aug-1999, Daan Leijen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The bad thing is that Corba is not a binary protocol and thus H/Direct needs
> a different backend/mapping for each different Corba vendor. Many languages
> provide a Corba binding by providing their own Corba environment and
> interacting
> "xander" == xander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
xander> Hi again,
xander> With our new knowledge of snoc (thanks!) we try to build ourself one
xander> operator:
xander> (<*>) :: [a] -> a -> [a]
xander> xs <*> x = xs ++ [x]
xander> But, why can't I do something like this:
xander> prev
Hi,
my patch for the use of `popen' is just an ad-hoc solution (aka hack)
that might be useful for people trying to do some shell-scripting in
hugs, before anything more fundamental becomes available. The security
problem (thanks to Fergus Henderson and Carl Witty for pointing it out)
must be dea
> In brief:
>
>Define __HASKELL__=98 and __HASKELL98__ as preprocessor macros for all
>Haskell 98 compilers.
>
> I would like to hear from from maintainers of ghc, hbc and nhc if this can
> be accepted as a "de facto" standard. Please make the (small) change to
> the compiler or reply
Hi again,
With our new knowledge of snoc (thanks!) we try to build ourself one
operator:
(<*>) :: [a] -> a -> [a]
xs <*> x = xs ++ [x]
But, why can't I do something like this:
prev (ListElem (xs<*>x,ys)) = ListElem (xs, x:ys)
It works ok with (:) ..
Regards,
cees-bart breunesse
xander van
Erik Meijer wrote:
> [...] I think that this really depends in which world you live. In
> Unix/Linux-land components are usually distributed as C source files.
> In Windows-land you either get a DLL or a COM component with a type
> library (a binary representation of its IDL description), [...]
T
Hello!
On Tue, Aug 24, 1999 at 03:41:18AM +1000, Fergus Henderson wrote:
> [...]
> This is a convenient hack, but IMHO it is not suitable for inclusion
> in the Haskell standard library, because it increases the risk of
> security holes in Haskell applications.
I agree. I don't like that simila
> "Marko" == Marko Schuetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Simon" == Simon Peyton-Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> One possible solution would be a Wiki (formerly WikiWiki) site.
>>> This was also mentioned some time ago, but, again, no-one
>>> seemed to know how to go about doing i
It WOULD be nice if you could match on functions and not just
constructors. But I presume that the constructor/function dichotomy
in Haskell is what allows it to be strongly typed? For example, in the
untyped 'language' Mathematica employs, pattern matching is
allowed on both constructors a
> In brief:
>
>Define __HASKELL__=98 and __HASKELL98__ as preprocessor
> macros for all
>Haskell 98 compilers.
Ok, GHC 4.04 (in the forthcoming patchlevel 1 release) will follow suit.
Cheers,
Simon
> Out of curiosity, how big is the user community? How many
> downloads of
> the software? How many are on this list?
There are ~700 people on the Haskell list, ~200 on glasgow-haskell-users and
~150 on hugs-users. About 160 people downloaded ghc-4.02 for Linux last
month, I'm waiting to find
On 21-Aug-1999, Heribert Schuetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The appended patch to Hugs98 (to be applied in the src subdirectory)
> might be of some help for those who want to do shell scripting in
> Haskell. It modifies IO.openFile as follows:
>
> - If the name of a file opened in ReadMode ends
20 matches
Mail list logo
